Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
92 Imaging
40 Features
36 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
- Released January 2014
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB50F, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) and WB50F (1/2.3") possess different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 was manufactured 4 years prior to the WB50F and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 scores vs the WB50F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB50F. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery and Samsung WB50F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Samsung WB50F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
WB50F | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | September 2010 | Fresher by 40 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and Samsung WB50F
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | WB50F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 offers outside measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has dimensions of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus Samsung WB50F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 versus the WB50F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB50F is 88 and 92 respectively.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specs. The photograph here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and WB50F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung WB50F will deliver extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The older GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB50F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | Samsung WB50F |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2010-09-21 | 2014-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | GR Engine III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28mm (1x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180s | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/3200s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 140 grams (0.31 lb) | 207 grams (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") | 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-90 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $566 | $180 |