Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F
84 Imaging
53 Features
39 Overall
47
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1/9000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
- Announced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched January 2013
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is pretty similar but the GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) and WB250F (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe GXR Mount A12 was introduced 17 months prior to the WB250F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise summation of how the GXR Mount A12 matches up vs the WB250F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB250F. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Samsung WB250F
GXR Mount A12 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12
WB250F | GXR Mount A12 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2011 | More recent by 17 months | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 and Samsung WB250F
GXR Mount A12 | WB250F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh GXR Mount A12 offers outside dimensions of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has dimensions of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 versus Samsung WB250F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the GXR Mount A12 vs the WB250F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the GXR Mount A12 and WB250F is 84 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by going over technical specs. The visual below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR Mount A12 and WB250F.
As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The GXR Mount A12 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Samsung WB250F will offer you more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older GXR Mount A12 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB250F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh GXR Mount A12 | Samsung WB250F |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-08-05 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 2848 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | () | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1s | 16s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/9000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.60 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 370g (0.82 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | DB-90 | - |
Self timer | Yes (5 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $349 | $250 |