Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19064/19064172b06e5d452c23117f62fb823105c4f36b" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bfe6/8bfe6a95e0404efc2daeb5daa70aaa6f63f8ea78" alt="Samsung CL80 front Samsung CL80 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Introduced March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL80, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and CL80 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and CL80 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was introduced 3 months after the CL80 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise summation of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC matches up versus the CL80 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung CL80
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
CL80 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL80
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Similar age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has outside dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung CL80 has proportions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the CL80.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfefd/cfefdca636913ccbdcecd93c687cdf1e39653d5a" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and CL80 is 85 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6fc1/d6fc12a80166a8f123aea3acc3b7db24bcf49882" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The pic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and CL80.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung CL80 will give you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8f7d/f8f7d0d872ce5780f70595472f39feeee98f7df3" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f3c2/2f3c26812e55be488953973770c36f6fe6541570" alt="Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung CL80 |
Also referred to as | - | ST5500 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2010-03-18 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4334 x 3256 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 4800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 920 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 180s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) | 160 grams (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $349 | $400 |