Clicky

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000

Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
 
Samsung NX1000 front
Portability
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Key Specs

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Revealed March 2010
Samsung NX1000
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
  • Introduced April 2012
  • Later Model is Samsung NX1100
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Overview

In this write-up, we are analyzing the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and NX1000 (20MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and NX1000 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was revealed 3 years prior to the NX1000 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC scores vs the NX1000 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung NX1000

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC NX1000 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1000 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 NX1000 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
IntroducedApril 2012March 2010Newer by 25 months
Display resolution921k920kCrisper display (+1k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX1000

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC NX1000 
Focus manually  More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurements
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Absent Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC offers physical dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1000 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs the NX1000.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX1000 is 85 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Typically, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and NX1000.
As you can see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX1000 will give extra detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is going to be behind in sensor technology.
	
			Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photography Glossary	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography details
Samsung NX1000 Portrait photography details
36
 you can focus manually
 delivers RAW files
 no liveview feature
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
77
 has manual focus
 decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 provides face detection focusing
 saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Street Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography details
Samsung NX1000 Street photography details
65
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than others (355g)
 no moving screen
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
73
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 lighter than competition (222g)
 fixed screen
 does not have image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Sports Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography factors
Samsung NX1000 Sports photography factors
25
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview feature
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames per second)
 low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
 no phase detect auto focus
56
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 does not have image stabilization
 does not have phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Travel Comparison
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Travel photography with Samsung NX1000
60
 lighter than others (355g)
 has built in flash
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
68
 lighter than competition (222 grams)
 decent megapixels (20MP)
 no Time Lapse mode
 doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography details
Samsung NX1000 Landscape photography details
47
 you can focus manually
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 screen is a decent size (3 inch)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview feature
 low resolution sensor (10MP)
 tiny sensor size (1/1.7")
71
 has manual focus
 change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
 decent sized screen (3 inch)
 decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 saves RAW files
 does not have image stabilization
 no Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging highlights
Samsung NX1000 Vlogging highlights
28
 reasonably wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than others (355 grams)
 slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 does not contain selfie friendly screen
 low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
 doesn't have microphone port
34
 provides face detection focusing
 video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
 lighter than competition (222g)
 doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
 does not have image stabilization
 no external mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	

		

			
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung NX1000 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung NX1000
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VCSamsung NX1000
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Samsung NX1000
Type Advanced Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-03-18 2012-04-19
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Smooth Imaging Engine IV -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/1.7" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 7.44 x 5.58mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 41.5mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 3:2 and  16:9
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Maximum native ISO 3200 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch focus    
Continuous autofocus    
Autofocus single    
Autofocus tracking    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Autofocus multi area    
Autofocus live view    
Face detection autofocus    
Contract detection autofocus    
Phase detection autofocus    
Number of focus points - 15
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 24-72mm (3.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/2.5-4.4 -
Macro focus distance 1cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Crop factor 4.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 920 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 180 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 2.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manually set exposure    
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Integrated flash    
Flash range 4.50 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure    
Average exposure    
Spot exposure    
Partial exposure    
AF area exposure    
Center weighted exposure    
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 355 gr (0.78 pounds) 222 gr (0.49 pounds)
Dimensions 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 72
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.4
DXO Low light score not tested 840
Other
Battery life 410 photos 320 photos
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $349 $388