Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 20mm
- Announced January 2011
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung PL210, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Ricoh and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and PL210 (14MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") and PL210 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC was brought out 9 months prior to the PL210 and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung PL210 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC grades versus the PL210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC & Samsung PL210. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery & Samsung PL210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Samsung PL210
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | PL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL210 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
PL210 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | March 2010 | More recent by 9 months |
Common features in the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung PL210
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | PL210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC enjoys exterior dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung PL210 has specifications of 100mm x 59mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and Samsung PL210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC compared to the PL210.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and PL210 is 85 and 99 respectively.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and PL210.
As you have seen, both of the cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Samsung PL210 will render more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The older GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC vs Samsung PL210 Specifications
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung PL210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | Samsung PL210 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2010-03-18 | 2011-01-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 41.5mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-72mm (3.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/2.5-4.4 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 4.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 920k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 180 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) | - |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 100 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 410 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $349 | $200 |