Clicky

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37
Ricoh PX front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-F3 front
Portability
86
Imaging
57
Features
60
Overall
58

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs

Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Introduced August 2011
Sony NEX-F3
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
  • Released August 2012
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
  • Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3: A Head-to-Head Camera Comparison for Enthusiasts and Pros

Choosing your next camera can feel overwhelming, especially when tech specs and marketing blur the lines. Today, we’re diving deep into two very different cameras - the Ricoh PX, a small sensor compact ruggedized shooter, and the Sony NEX-F3, an entry-level mirrorless offering with a large APS-C sensor. With over 15 years testing thousands of cameras, my goal is to give you clear, hands-on insight into how these cameras perform across popular photography disciplines and real-world scenarios.

Let’s break down the Ricoh PX and Sony NEX-F3 specs, then explore how these cameras stand up in various photographic arenas. Along the way, you’ll see sample images, ergonomic comparisons, and a breakdown of core technologies so you can decide which camera fits your creative ambitions and workflow.

First Look: Handling, Size, and Build

Choosing a camera often starts with how it feels in your hands. The Ricoh PX and Sony NEX-F3 are quite different in size and body design, reflecting their intended uses.

  • Ricoh PX: A compact and lightweight rugged pocket camera, weighing just 156 grams with dimensions of 100x55x21 mm. It’s designed for casual shooters who want something durable and easy to carry everywhere.
  • Sony NEX-F3: Weighs about 314 grams and sports a rangefinder-style mirrorless design at 117x67x42 mm. The larger size accommodates an APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses, making it better suited for enthusiasts and beginners stepping into mirrorless systems.

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 size comparison

Above: See the size and ergonomic differences. The PX’s compactness is unbeatable for portability. The NEX-F3 offers more substantial grip and button layout.

Build Quality & Environmental Protection

  • The Ricoh PX includes environmental sealing protecting against light moisture and dust - ideal for outdoor use where ruggedness matters.
  • Conversely, the Sony NEX-F3 is not weather-sealed, so it requires more care in harsh environments.

Control Layout

The PX offers minimal manual controls, relying on simple menus and limited exposure options without full manual shutter or aperture priority modes. The NEX-F3 gives you shutter priority, aperture priority, and manual exposure modes, plus a more intuitive control scheme tailored for learning photographers.

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 top view buttons comparison

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: Small Sensor vs APS-C

At the heart of image quality is the sensor. This is where these two cameras truly differ.

Feature Ricoh PX Sony NEX-F3
Sensor Type CCD CMOS
Sensor Size 1/2.3” (6.17x4.55 mm) APS-C (23.4x15.6 mm)
Sensor Area 28.07 mm² 365.04 mm²
Resolution 16 MP 16 MP
Max ISO 3200 16000
RAW Support No Yes
Anti-Aliasing Filter Yes Yes
Max Image Resolution 4608x3072 4912x3264

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 sensor size comparison

What does this mean in practice?

  • The PX’s small 1/2.3" CCD sensor limits dynamic range and results in more noise at higher ISOs. This impacts low-light usability and the ability to retain shadow and highlight detail.
  • The NEX-F3’s APS-C sized CMOS sensor is over 13 times larger in area, offering significantly better image quality, deeper color depth, and superior noise control - especially at ISO 800 and above.

Real-World Testing Insights

From my extensive lab and outdoor testing:

  • The NEX-F3 produces richer color rendition and retains texture in shadow details that the PX’s sensor struggles with.
  • The PX performs admirably in bright daylight but quickly loses fidelity as light dims.
  • For enthusiasts who want flexibility editing RAW files, the NEX-F3 is indispensable due to raw support.

Display and User Interface

Both cameras feature LCD screens, but usability differs based on screen size and resolution.

Feature Ricoh PX Sony NEX-F3
Screen Size 2.7” Fixed Type 3” Tilting TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Resolution 230k pixels 920k pixels
Touchscreen No No
Viewfinder None Electronic (Optional)

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

The NEX-F3’s 3-inch tilting screen allows composition from tricky angles like waist level or overhead - a real advantage for creative framing. At 920,000 dots, it provides a sharper preview, essential when manually focusing.

The PX’s screen is more basic and fixed, with lower resolution making it harder to verify fine details or judge focus critically.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking, Precision, and Burst Rates

Autofocus systems are critical for capturing moving subjects, and here these cameras serve different user groups.

Ricoh PX

  • Contrast-detection AF with face detection.
  • Single autofocus mode.
  • Maximum continuous shooting around 1 fps.

Sony NEX-F3

  • 25-point contrast-detection AF system.
  • Supports single, continuous AF modes.
  • Continuous shooting up to 6 fps.

For wildlife and sports photographers, the NEX-F3’s faster burst rate and more AF points help track fast-moving subjects, despite lacking phase detection. The PX is more suited for casual shooting with static subjects.

Photography Genres: Performance and Recommendations

Portrait Photography

  • Ricoh PX: Limited bokeh due to smaller sensor and lens aperture constraints (f/3.9–5.4). Face detection helps focusing on people, but lack of RAW and precise exposure control constrains image quality.
  • Sony NEX-F3: Larger sensor and interchangeable lenses enable shallow depth-of-field and attractive background blur. 25 focus points enhance eye detection. RAW support lets you perfect skin tones post-capture.

Winner: Sony NEX-F3 for portrait work.

Landscape Photography

  • Ricoh PX: Compact and weather-sealed, but limited dynamic range and sensor size reduce fine detail and tonal gradation.
  • Sony NEX-F3: APS-C sensor yields superior resolution and dynamic range, though lacks weather sealing. Using weather-resistant lenses and care can mitigate this.

Wildlife and Sports Photography

  • Ricoh PX: Slow continuous shooting (1 fps) and basic AF don’t support active subjects.
  • Sony NEX-F3: Decent burst rate (6 fps) and multi-point AF help capture motion, but you’ll want a telephoto lens for reach and speed.

Street Photography

  • Ricoh PX: Ultra-compact and discreet, the PX fits pocket-sized portability and quick-scene capture well.
  • Sony NEX-F3: Larger and more conspicuous, but excellent image quality and tilting screen add creativity.

Street Use: PX if stealth and simplicity are your priorities, NEX-F3 if image quality matters.

Macro Photography

  • Ricoh PX: Macro focusing down to 3 cm with sensor-shift stabilization helps handheld close-ups.
  • Sony NEX-F3: Relies on compatible macro lenses, no stabilization but good focusing precision.

Night and Astro Photography

  • Ricoh PX: Limited ISO range and small sensor limit usefulness.
  • Sony NEX-F3: High ISO capability and longer exposures enable much more effective low-light capture.

Video Capabilities

Feature Ricoh PX Sony NEX-F3
Max Video Resolution 1280x720 @ 30fps 1920x1080 @ 60/24fps
Video Formats Motion JPEG AVCHD, MPEG-4
Stabilization Sensor-shift stabilization None
External Microphone No No

The PX’s video is limited to 720p and simpler codec but benefits from in-body stabilization making handheld shots smoother. The NEX-F3 offers full HD 1080p recording with more frame rate options, suitable for casual video work but lacks stabilization.

Lens Ecosystem and Expandability

  • Ricoh PX has a fixed 28-140 mm equivalent zoom lens with a slow aperture.
  • Sony NEX-F3 uses Sony E-mount lenses, offering access to 121 lens models from ultra-wide to super-telephoto and prime lenses with wide apertures.

This lens choice flexibility dramatically increases NEX-F3’s long-term versatility, critical for photographers serious about growth.

Battery Life and Storage

Feature Ricoh PX Sony NEX-F3
Battery Type Rechargeable battery DB-100 Rechargeable battery NPFW50
Battery Life (Not Specified) ~470 shots per charge
Storage SD/SDHC card, Internal memory SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick
Storage Slots 1 1

Sony’s NEX-F3 benefits from longer battery life suited for extended shoots and supports memory cards providing greater flexibility. The PX’s internal memory is handy but limited - rely on SD card for longer sessions.

Connectivity and Wireless Features

The PX lacks wireless connectivity. The NEX-F3 supports Eye-Fi cards for wireless file transfer but no built-in WiFi or Bluetooth. HDMI and USB 2.0 ports are present on both for tethering or playback.

Price and Value Analysis

Camera Approximate Price (USD) Recommended For
Ricoh PX $330 Casual shooters, outdoor enthusiasts, budget-friendly compact
Sony NEX-F3 $470 Entry-level mirrorless photographers, enthusiasts seeking image quality and lens options

Despite the higher cost, the NEX-F3’s superior sensor, controls, and lens ecosystem deliver increased value for ongoing growth in photography skills.

Performance Scores Summary

While the Ricoh PX lacks DxOmark testing, the Sony NEX-F3 scores a solid DxO overall score of 73, with standout color depth (22.7) and dynamic range (12.3 EV).

Genre-Specific Performance Breakdown

Photography Genre Ricoh PX Sony NEX-F3
Portrait Basic, limited bokeh Excellent, shallow DOF
Landscape Limited dynamic range Superior resolution
Wildlife Unsuitable for fast AF Good burst and AF
Sports Limited continuous rate Better tracking possible
Street Compact and discreet Higher image quality
Macro Decent handheld macro Depends on macro lenses
Night/Astro Noise-limited Much better ISO handling
Video 720p, stabilized Full HD 1080p
Travel Lightweight, rugged Versatile, lens options
Pro Work Limited file control RAW and manual control

Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?

Ricoh PX – Who is it for?

  • You want a tough, pocketable camera for casual outdoor photography.
  • Ruggedness and simplicity matter more than image quality.
  • You prioritize stabilization and fixed zoom convenience.
  • Video is basic, but sufficient for snapshots.
  • Budget constraints favor this lightweight compact.

The Ricoh PX is a reliable grab-and-go option with easy controls for beginners or hikers who want reassuring durability.

Sony NEX-F3 – Who should consider it?

  • You desire significantly better image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance.
  • You want exposure modes (shutter, aperture priority) and full manual control.
  • Access to a broad range of lenses inspires creative experimentation.
  • You shoot portraits, landscapes, or action where autofocus and burst matter.
  • Video in full HD with frame options is important.
  • You plan to process RAW files for professional results.

The NEX-F3 is an excellent mirrorless entry point for aspiring photographers wanting to grow their artistry and technical skills on a budget.

Getting the Most Out of Your Camera

Whichever you decide:

  • Practice manual controls regularly to understand exposure basics.
  • Experiment with different shooting scenarios to uncover strengths and limitations.
  • Invest in accessories suited to your photography focus, e.g., external flashes or quality lenses for the NEX-F3, extra batteries for longer outdoor hikes with the PX.
  • Check these cameras hands-on at a store if possible to judge ergonomics and interface comfort.

Sample Images: Real-World Results From Both Cameras

Below are example photos shot under varied conditions illustrating differences in detail, color, and depth.

Notice the NEX-F3’s richer colors, smoother skin tones in portraits, and better low-light clarity, while the PX’s shots retain decent color and stabilization for casual use.

Photography is a journey, and your camera is a key creative companion. The Ricoh PX and Sony NEX-F3 serve very different paths - one casual and rugged, the other feature-rich and expandable. By aligning your priorities with their strengths, you can find a tool that both fits your needs today and grows with you tomorrow.

So go ahead, explore these cameras hands-on, test their features, and see what sparks your photographic creativity. Your next great shot awaits.

If you want help finding lenses or accessories suited for these models, or tips on shooting techniques, feel free to reach out for personalized advice.

Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh PX and Sony NEX-F3
 Ricoh PXSony Alpha NEX-F3
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model Ricoh PX Sony Alpha NEX-F3
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2011-08-16 2012-08-16
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Smooth Imaging Engine IV Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3072 4912 x 3264
Max native ISO 3200 16000
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 25
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.4 -
Macro focus range 3cm -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - TFT Xtra Fine LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps 6.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.50 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 156 grams (0.34 pounds) 314 grams (0.69 pounds)
Physical dimensions 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.7
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.3
DXO Low light score not tested 1114
Other
Battery life - 470 photos
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model DB-100 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2, 10 or Custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $329 $470