Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Released August 2012
- Replaced the Sony NEX-C3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-3N
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Ricoh PX versus Sony NEX-F3, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Ricoh and Sony. The sensor resolution of the PX (16MP) and the NEX-F3 (16MP) is pretty similar but the PX (1/2.3") and NEX-F3 (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe PX was released 12 months earlier than the NEX-F3 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera and the Sony NEX-F3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the PX grades vs the NEX-F3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh PX and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh PX Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Sony NEX-F3
| PX | NEX-F3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Ricoh PX
| NEX-F3 | PX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | August 2011 | More modern by 12 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh PX and Sony NEX-F3
| PX | NEX-F3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh PX enjoys exterior measurements of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Sony NEX-F3 has proportions of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh PX versus Sony NEX-F3 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the PX versus the NEX-F3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the PX and NEX-F3 is 95 and 86 respectively.
Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the PX and NEX-F3.
As you have seen, each of these cameras feature the identical resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The PX features the tinier sensor which will make getting shallower DOF trickier. The more aged PX is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh PX vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
| Ricoh PX | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Ricoh | Sony |
| Model | Ricoh PX | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2011-08-16 | 2012-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Smooth Imaging Engine IV | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 365.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3072 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.4 | - |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 6.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 156 grams (0.34 pounds) | 314 grams (0.69 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 1114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 470 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | DB-100 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $329 | $470 |