Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2103a/2103adbddc269259d95545a9af4d247992bac1f0" alt="Samsung TL350 front Samsung TL350 front"
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Announced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Released February 2010
- Other Name is WB2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the WG-20 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The WG-20 was manufactured 4 years after the TL350 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the WG-20 matches up versus the TL350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung TL350
WG-20 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 49 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Ricoh WG-20
TL350 | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung TL350
WG-20 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-20 has got exterior dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-20 against the TL350.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77bec/77bec05844d05a9dc3e418629c289a04a0068c9e" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and TL350 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73587/73587e5ec52a9b2fd7a4af2668f271335d0686ee" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and TL350.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-20 to provide greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher WG-20 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11614/11614206a03399df0dc5ed55fdf25129b776444e" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54b4f/54b4f0d590600930e5ecd0e0d7a2486c13f57a70" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung TL350 |
Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-02-20 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 164 grams (0.36 pounds) | 195 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $370 | $400 |