Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750
93 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Announced September 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Ricoh WG-20 versus Samsung WB750, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the WB750 (13MP) is relatively well matched and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe WG-20 was manufactured 2 years later than the WB750 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the WG-20 scores vs the WB750 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-20 & Samsung WB750. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Samsung WB750
| WG-20 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | September 2011 | More recent by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Ricoh WG-20
| WB750 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Samsung WB750
| WG-20 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-20 offers outer dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-20 versus Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the WG-20 and the WB750.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-20 and WB750 is 93 and 93 respectively.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-20 and WB750.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Ricoh WG-20 to give you extra detail due to its extra 1MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent WG-20 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Ricoh WG-20 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 164g (0.36 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $370 | $339 |
