Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f6b9/0f6b92e8e7b3c6a64e703e8b995daab652fd7cfe" alt="Ricoh WG-20 front Ricoh WG-20 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f04d9/f04d99e0c26c31be60485c208bc04019fbc69c93" alt="Sigma DP2 Merrill front Sigma DP2 Merrill front"
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2014
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Older Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Successor is Sigma DP3 Merrill
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-20 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Ricoh and Sigma. The image resolution of the WG-20 (14MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is very close but the WG-20 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-20 was announced 2 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the WG-20 matches up vs the DP2 Merrill in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-20 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-20 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-20 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Ricoh WG-20
DP2 Merrill | WG-20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-20 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
WG-20 | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-20 provides outer dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-20 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-20 versus the DP2 Merrill.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e607c/e607c04cfdf66db30fef01e1038a6c1f480f5fd5" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the WG-20 and DP2 Merrill is 93 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/590db/590dbc050aa9721412a1758a3b5dac54852e9dc5" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing just by viewing specifications. The visual here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-20 and DP2 Merrill.
Plainly, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The WG-20 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will render greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more modern WG-20 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79c76/79c76321ef6bd2dc520fa0354229d5b9519ed9f8" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c4a0/6c4a0b34f850e61df2982b794b2554ecffb37f8d" alt="Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-20 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Ricoh WG-20 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-20 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 164 gr (0.36 lb) | 330 gr (0.73 lb) |
Dimensions | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 260 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $370 | $931 |