Clicky

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65

Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
34
Overall
38
Ricoh WG-30 front
 
Samsung ST65 front
Portability
99
Imaging
37
Features
19
Overall
29

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-30
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Released October 2014
Samsung ST65
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 0 - 0
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
  • Launched January 2011
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-30 (16MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The WG-30 was unveiled 3 years later than the ST65 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-30 scores versus the ST65 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Samsung ST65

 WG-30 ST65 
LaunchedOctober 2014January 2011More recent by 46 months

Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Ricoh WG-30

 ST65 WG-30 
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung ST65

 WG-30 ST65 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Neither provides Touch screen

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-30 provides outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has sizing of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the WG-30 and the ST65.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-30 and ST65 is 91 and 99 respectively.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The visual here might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-30 and ST65.

As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The younger WG-30 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Portrait photography info
Samsung ST65 Portrait photography info
36
good MP (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
28
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Street photography features
Samsung ST65 Street photography features
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
49
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
low max ISO (0)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Sports photography factors
Samsung ST65 Sports photography factors
45
has image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
low fps (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
26
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
fixed focal length (()mm)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung ST65 as a Travel photography camera
71
weather sealing
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
71
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
missing Time Lapse recording
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-30 Landscape photography advice
Samsung ST65 Landscape photography advice
43
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
good MP (16MP)
weather sealing
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
37
very good max aperture (f)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (()mm)
lack of manual mode
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
low max ISO (0)
doesn't have RAW support
missing Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-30
Vlogging with Samsung ST65
33
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone port
27
very good max aperture (f)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing mic port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Ricoh WG-30 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-30 and Samsung ST65
 Ricoh WG-30Samsung ST65
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Samsung
Model type Ricoh WG-30 Samsung ST65
Category Waterproof Ultracompact
Released 2014-10-09 2011-01-19
Body design Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.16 x 4.62mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 6400 -
Lowest native ISO 125 -
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.5-5.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.90 m (Auto ISO) -
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 1280 x 720
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 192 grams (0.42 lbs) -
Physical dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes -
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $428 $130