Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a851/5a851ef78e48f8e044878a725f768ce7cb93cf0c" alt="Samsung GX-1L front Samsung GX-1L front"
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Revealed February 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung GX-1L, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the WG-30W (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the WG-30W (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The WG-30W was launched 8 years after the GX-1L which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick summary of how the WG-30W scores versus the GX-1L in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung GX-1L. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung GX-1L
WG-30W | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2006 | Newer by 105 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Sharper screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Ricoh WG-30W
GX-1L | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung GX-1L
WG-30W | GX-1L | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-30W comes with outer measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has measurements of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") with a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the WG-30W compared to the GX-1L.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d36e/9d36ee18e0a08e53df7e5337a483064dca72e16d" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and GX-1L is 91 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7177/f7177bf34bca165c07c5c97d8572b70dd2752919" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to see the gap between sensor dimensions purely by looking at specs. The picture below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-30W and GX-1L.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The WG-30W due to its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Ricoh WG-30W will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-30W is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a1df/8a1dfe91edcd71f206aeb23fd5b3cf31aaca336e" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/880c9/880c9f19263c569ff862924dc6e28763895c9e6d" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung GX-1L | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung GX-1L |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2014-10-09 | 2006-02-24 |
Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 5 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 7.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lbs) | 570 grams (1.26 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $280 | $0 |