Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched October 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung WB210, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-30W was launched 3 years after the WB210 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the WG-30W matches up vs the WB210 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30W & Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Samsung WB210
| WG-30W | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | October 2014 |  | July 2011 | Newer by 40 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| WB210 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Samsung WB210
| WG-30W | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-30W provides outside dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-30W versus Samsung WB210 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-30W versus the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-30W and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by checking a spec sheet. The picture here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-30W and WB210.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-30W to give you more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern WG-30W will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Ricoh WG-30W vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-30W | Samsung WB210 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-10-09 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) | 174 gr (0.38 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $280 | $279 |