Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets look much closer at the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. The resolution of the WG-30W (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is very similar but the WG-30W (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-30W was unveiled 8 months later than the DP2 Quattro which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the WG-30W matches up against the DP2 Quattro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-30W Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-30W | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2014 | ![]() | February 2014 | Fresher by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Ricoh WG-30W
DP2 Quattro | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Quattro
WG-30W | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-30W enjoys outer dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has specifications of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") along with a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-30W and Sigma DP2 Quattro in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-30W against the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/438c3/438c30f225f0247a278567653094377e7f0b3d14" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-30W and DP2 Quattro is 91 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e0fa/0e0fad944e27291737aae9dd7dfcb9f6542c00ea" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The visual here might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-30W and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The WG-30W with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will offer you more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-30W will have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98d4b/98d4b4d1b8df273d223b8a43dc2c74051d1962f5" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d6b7/8d6b7732801ff88bb438ceeff87b25a855984fb3" alt="Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-30W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-30W | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model type | Ricoh WG-30W | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2014-10-09 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 194 grams (0.43 lb) | 395 grams (0.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $280 | $931 |