Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB600
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Let's look more closely at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung HZ30W, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Ricoh and Samsung. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) but they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe WG-4 GPS was released 4 years after the HZ30W which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a concise summation of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the HZ30W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung HZ30W. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung HZ30W
| WG-4 GPS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| HZ30W | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung HZ30W
| WG-4 GPS | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS comes with outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the HZ30W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and HZ30W is 90 and 91 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-4 GPS and HZ30W.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to render more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung HZ30W |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB600 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 235g (0.52 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 photos | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $210 | $280 |
