Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX100
- Successor is Samsung NX210
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung NX200, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is pretty well matched but the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe WG-4 GPS was released 24 months after the NX200 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the WG-4 GPS matches up versus the NX200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX200. The complete galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung NX200
WG-4 GPS | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | February 2012 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
NX200 | WG-4 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Crisper screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung NX200
WG-4 GPS | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has measurements of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung NX200 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the NX200.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-4 GPS and NX200 is 90 and 90 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading through specs. The picture here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and NX200.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The WG-4 GPS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX200 will give more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung NX200 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 223 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 shots | 330 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $210 | $818 |