Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Updated by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL65
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL620, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-4 GPS was brought out 5 years later than the SL620 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the WG-4 GPS matches up against the SL620 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung SL620. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung SL620
| WG-4 GPS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 61 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| SL620 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung SL620
| WG-4 GPS | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outer dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung SL620 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the SL620.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and SL620 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing only by reviewing a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and SL620.
Clearly, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The newer WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung SL620 |
| Also Known as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 gr (0.52 lbs) | 168 gr (0.37 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $210 | $200 |