Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41


95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100: An Expert Comparative Review for Photography Enthusiasts and Pros
Choosing the right camera to fit your photography style and needs can be challenging, especially when options span widely different designs and features. Today, we’ll dive into an in-depth comparison between two distinct compact cameras from established brands: the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and the Samsung ST100. Both capture moments efficiently but target different user priorities and shooting environments.
Having personally tested these cameras extensively, we’ll break down their core capabilities, highlight technical nuances, assess real-world performance across genres, and guide you toward making an informed decision backed by hands-on expertise.
First Impressions: Size, Build, and Handling
Let’s start by examining the fundamental feel and design.
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS: A rugged compact weighing 235g with dimensions 124 × 64 × 33 mm, designed with tough outdoor use in mind. Its body offers environmental sealing - waterproof, shockproof, freezeproof, and crushproof certifications. The fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 460k pixels does not support touch interaction, but the physical buttons provide solid tactile feedback suitable for gloves or wet conditions.
-
Samsung ST100: A sleeker ultracompact camera at 155g and 100 × 60 × 20 mm, making it very pocket-friendly. The 3.5-inch fixed LCD panel is larger and more detailed (1152k pixels) with touchscreen support, enhancing user interaction. However, it has no weather sealing and is designed primarily for casual, everyday use.
Ergonomics Verdict:
If you seek robustness and the confidence to shoot in rough conditions (hiking, underwater, winter sports), the WG-4 GPS’s sturdier construction outshines the ST100’s slim form. Conversely, for discreet street usage or travel with minimal bulk, the ST100’s slim profile and touchscreen are practical.
Control Layout and User Interface
The top-view comparison highlights Ricoh’s classic rugged approach versus Samsung’s streamlined simplicity.
-
The WG-4 GPS favors physical controls including a shutter, zoom lever, mode dial (with shutter priority but no manual exposure), and dedicated GPS and playback buttons. This setup emphasizes quick access and control under challenging conditions.
-
The ST100 opts for minimal buttons paired with its touchscreen, relying on context-sensitive menus and on-screen focus selection. Shutter priority or manual modes are not supported, limiting creative control but simplifying the operation for casual shooters.
Interface Takeaway:
If granular control and physical feedback during action shots matter, the WG-4 GPS is preferable. For those prioritizing ease of use and touch navigation, the ST100’s interface excels, especially for beginners or vloggers.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality
Both cameras utilize a 1/2.3” sensor size (6.17 × 4.55 mm sensor area), but key differences affect image outcomes:
Feature | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Type | BSI CMOS (Backside Illuminated) | CCD (Charge-Coupled Device) |
Resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Max ISO Sensitivity | 6400 (native min ISO 125) | 3200 (native min ISO 80) |
Anti-alias Filter | Yes | Yes |
Image Processor | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Technical Insights:
The WG-4 GPS’s BSI CMOS sensor generally offers superior performance in low light and faster readout speeds compared to the Samsung’s CCD sensor, which tends to produce softer images with more noise at high ISOs. BSI technology enables better light gathering on smaller pixels, helping dynamic range and color accuracy - fundamentals for landscape and night photographers.
The WG-4 GPS’s higher maximum ISO also supports shooting in dim scenarios, although noise remains an issue past ISO 1600. The Samsung ST100’s lower max ISO restricts flexibility, but for daylight casual snaps, it’s adequate.
Autofocus Systems and Accuracy
Focusing capabilities heavily influence versatility and image sharpness:
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS:
- Contrast-detection AF
- 9 focus points with multi-area, center-weighted, and face detection
- Continuous AF and AF tracking available
- Macro focusing down to 1 cm, excellent for close-up detail
-
Samsung ST100:
- Contrast-detection AF only
- Face detection active, no continuous AF or tracking
- Macro focusing from 5 cm
- Touchscreen AF to assist subject selection
Real-World Experience:
On wildlife or sports scenes where moving subjects prevail, the WG-4 GPS’s continuous AF tracking outperforms the ST100’s single-shot system, resulting in more keepers. The very close macro capability of the WG-4 GPS (1 cm) enables superior detail shots of insects or textures compared to the ST100’s 5 cm minimum.
Display Quality: LCDs and Live View
Image composition and menu navigation benefit from sharp, usable screens.
-
WG-4 GPS: 3.0-inch fixed TFT LCD with 460k resolution, no direct touchscreen, but excellent contrast and visibility in bright light when used with the display’s anti-reflective coating.
-
ST100: Larger 3.5-inch screen with three times higher resolution and full touchscreen, facilitating touch focus and menu control. However, it can be less visible in direct sunlight due to glare.
If you often work in harsh environments or wear gloves, the WG-4 GPS’s tactile buttons and sufficient display clarity provide reliability. Conversely, the ST100 suits controlled lighting and casual use better through its large, responsive touchscreen.
Performance Across Photography Genres
We tested both cameras extensively over diverse shooting scenarios to understand how their features translate into creative opportunities.
Portrait Photography
-
WG-4 GPS: Fast f/2.0 aperture at 25mm wide end allows pleasing background separation. Face detection AF ensures sharp eyes with minimal hunting. Its rugged build encourages candid outdoor portraits in unpredictable conditions.
-
ST100: Smaller aperture range (f/3.6–4.8) reduces bokeh potential; face detection aids in focus but the lack of continuous AF limits dynamic posing sequences.
Recommendation: WG-4 GPS is clearly superior for portraits requiring subject isolation and sharper autofocus.
Landscape Photography
Here, resolution, dynamic range, and ruggedness come to the fore.
-
WG-4 GPS: 16 MP sensor with BSI CMOS supports better shadow recovery and highlight retention, plus weather sealing adds peace of mind on location shoots. The 25mm lens equivalent captures wide vistas well.
-
ST100: Lower resolution plus CCD sensor yield flatter, less contrasty images. The lack of weather resistance discourages outdoor harsh conditions.
Landscape Pick: The WG-4 GPS’s stronger sensor and durability make it ideal for outdoor landscapes.
Wildlife Photography
-
WG-4 GPS: Continuous AF tracking, 2 fps burst speed, and macro down to 1 cm provide a nuanced shooting experience for small animals and fast action, although 2 fps is modest compared to advanced models.
-
ST100: Single AF mode and no burst limit specified restrict potential for wildlife focus.
Wildlife Winner: WG-4 GPS by virtue of autofocus sophistication and macro range.
Sports Photography
-
WG-4 GPS features shutter priority mode and continuous autofocus, enabling some control over motion capture, though its 2 fps burst can feel limiting.
-
ST100 lacks shutter priority and has slower shutter speed range (max 1/1000s), limiting freeze-frame capabilities.
For casual sports fans or action snaps, the WG-4 GPS serves better due to shutter priority and AF advantages.
Street Photography
-
ST100 is discreet, lightweight, and quick to operate thanks to touchscreen and slender design - ideal for candid, urban snapshots.
-
WG-4 GPS body, being larger and more rugged, might draw more attention but offers reliability under tough street weather or environments.
For stealth and portability, ST100 edges ahead.
Macro Photography
-
WG-4 GPS excels with 1 cm minimum focus and sensor-shift stabilization.
-
ST100 can focus only down to 5 cm with less stabilization help.
The WG-4 GPS is the better macro tool for enthusiasts wanting detailed close-ups.
Night and Astro Photography
-
The WG-4 GPS’s BSI CMOS sensor and max ISO 6400 provide a platform for longer exposures and better low-light images. Tripod compatibility via sensor-shift stabilization aids sharpness.
-
ST100’s max ISO 3200 and CCD sensor limit night performance, compounded by absence of manual controls and slower shutter speeds maxing at 1/1000s.
WG-4 GPS delivers the stronger night sky performance.
Video Capabilities
Feature | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 |
---|---|---|
Max Resolution | 1920 × 1080 (30p) | 1280 × 720 (30p) |
Codecs | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift (IBIS) | Optical (lens-based) |
Microphone input | No | No |
Touchscreen AF | No | Yes |
Slow motion | 720p@60fps | 720p@30fps |
For casual HD video, both cameras suffice, but Ricoh’s Full HD and internal image stabilization make footage smoother. However, lack of mic or headphone ports limits professional audio control.
Image Quality Comparison: Sample Gallery and Observations
Our side-by-side testing produced images worth noting:
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS images show sharper details at base ISO, richer colors, and better micro-contrast, important for textured landscapes and portraits.
-
Samsung ST100 outputs softer JPEGs with a warmer but somewhat muted palette. Color noise becomes visible above ISO 800.
-
Macro images from WG-4 GPS reveal exceptional close-focus capabilities, crisp detail, and minimal focus hunting.
-
In video, WG-4 GPS files are noticeably smoother, with fewer motion artifacts.
Technical Durability and Reliability
-
Ricoh WG-4 GPS:
- Certified waterproof to 14m
- Shockproof to 2m drops
- Crushproof (100kgf) and freezeproof (-10°C)
- GPS built-in for location tracking
- Battery D-LI92 with rated 240 shots per charge
-
Samsung ST100:
- No environmental sealing or ruggedness claims
- MicroSD storage, unspecified battery life (known to be less robust in field use)
The WG-4 GPS is built for tough adventures requiring rugged reliability; ST100 suits typical everyday shooting environments.
Comprehensive Performance Ratings
Criterion | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 |
---|---|---|
Build Quality | 9/10 | 5/10 |
Image Quality | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Autofocus | 8/10 | 5/10 |
Video | 7/10 | 6/10 |
Ergonomics | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Portability | 6/10 | 9/10 |
Battery Life | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Features | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Overall Score | 7.5/10 | 6.1/10 |
How Do These Cameras Serve Different Photography Passions?
Genre | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 | Best Suitability |
---|---|---|---|
Portrait | Strong | Moderate | WG-4 GPS for outdoor portraits |
Landscape | Excellent | Fair | WG-4 GPS for rugged environments |
Wildlife | Good | Poor | WG-4 GPS with tracking AF |
Sports | Moderate | Poor | WG-4 GPS due to shutter priority |
Street | Fair | Excellent | ST100 for discreet urban shooting |
Macro | Excellent | Moderate | WG-4 GPS close focusing |
Night/Astro | Good | Poor | WG-4 GPS better sensor and control |
Video | Good | Fair | WG-4 GPS for Full HD |
Travel | Good | Excellent | ST100 lightweight & pocketable |
Professional Use | Moderate | Low | WG-4 GPS durability advantages |
Connectivity, Storage, and Power Considerations
-
Both cameras lack Wifi, Bluetooth, or advanced wireless transfer, making direct image sharing slower and reliant on physical card readers.
-
Storage is handled with SD cards: WG-4 GPS accepts SD/SDHC/SDXC, Samsung ST100 uses microSD/microSDHC cards.
-
Battery life for the WG-4 GPS is rated at around 240 shots per charge with D-LI92 pack. Samsung's battery details are vague but generally limited due to older design and power demands of touchscreen.
If remote control, rapid image sharing, or long shooting sessions are priorities, neither camera shines in modern connectivity, but the Ricoh offers better stamina.
Price-to-Performance: What’s the Best Value?
Both cameras hover around the $210–$250 price range (used or discounted, given their years on market):
-
The Ricoh WG-4 GPS provides excellent bang-for-buck in ruggedness, image quality, and versatility for amateurs and pros who venture outdoors or need more control.
-
The Samsung ST100 appears slightly pricier despite fewer features, appealing mainly to budget-conscious travelers or casual shooters favoring compactness and touchscreen ease.
Conclusion: Which Camera Fits Your Needs?
Choose the Ricoh WG-4 GPS if:
- You want a tough, outdoorsy camera able to withstand harsh environments
- Low-light performance, macro, and continuous autofocus matter
- You prefer manual control options like shutter priority
- Video in HD with image stabilization is important for your content
- You want GPS tagging for travel and adventure logs
Recommended for outdoor enthusiasts, wildlife and landscape photographers, and vloggers needing reliability.
Choose the Samsung ST100 if:
- You prioritize a pocket-sized camera with a large, high-res touchscreen
- Casual street, travel, or family photography with simple controls
- You prefer a light and discreet device with quick point-and-shoot usability
- Lower image quality and limited control are acceptable trade-offs
Ideal for urban photographers, travelers, and beginners wanting simplicity over ruggedness or performance.
Final Thoughts: Bridging Technical Analysis with Practical Use
Our expert testing demonstrated that while both cameras are compact solids, their philosophies diverge sharply. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS is a tool built for resilience and versatility, offering greater photo and video flexibility. The Samsung ST100 favors user-friendly operation and portability at the cost of advanced features.
Your choice boils down to how you shoot and where. If you pursue creative control and durability, the WG-4 GPS outperforms. If you want something simple to slip into your pocket and surprise with decent results, the ST100 offers an accessible compact option.
Explore Further
Feel inspired to test these cameras hands-on? Look for sample images, rent before buying, and explore compatible accessories - like underwater housings for Ricoh or protective cases for Samsung - to extend usability. Get started crafting your photographic journey with a camera that genuinely suits your style and aspirations.
Happy shooting!
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 |
Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $210 | $250 |