Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-175mm (F3.6-4.8) lens
- 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
- Announced January 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung ST100, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST100 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe WG-4 GPS was released 4 years later than the ST100 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the WG-4 GPS scores against the ST100 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung ST100. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung ST100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST100
| WG-4 GPS | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 50 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST100 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| ST100 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST100
| WG-4 GPS | ST100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features external measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Samsung ST100 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS versus Samsung ST100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 GPS compared to the ST100.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and ST100 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing just by reviewing specs. The photograph below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 GPS and ST100.
All in all, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The younger WG-4 GPS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST100 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST100 |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.6-4.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,152 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $210 | $250 |