Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
96 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 118g - 92 x 55 x 19mm
- Announced January 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST80, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and the ST80 (14MP) is pretty similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-4 GPS was introduced 4 years after the ST80 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WG-4 GPS scores vs the ST80 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 GPS & Samsung ST80. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery & Samsung ST80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Samsung ST80
| WG-4 GPS | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 50 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST80 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| ST80 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST80
| WG-4 GPS | ST80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS features outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") and a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) while the Samsung ST80 has specifications of 92mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 118 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Samsung ST80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS against the ST80.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 GPS and ST80 is 90 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and ST80.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to deliver greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-4 GPS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Samsung ST80 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | Samsung ST80 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2014-02-05 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 235 grams (0.52 lbs) | 118 grams (0.26 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 92 x 55 x 19mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 240 shots | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | D-LI92 | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $210 | $249 |