Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
43
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 GPS front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
  • Refreshed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Revealed January 2008
  • Updated by Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Overview

Its time to look a little more in depth at the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A300, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Ricoh and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 GPS (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the WG-4 GPS (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The WG-4 GPS was announced 6 years later than the A300 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the WG-4 GPS scores versus the A300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Sony A300

 WG-4 GPS A300 
RevealedFebruary 2014January 2008More recent by 74 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS

 A300 WG-4 GPS 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A300

 WG-4 GPS A300 
Manual focus More exact focus
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will have to think about its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has got outside dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs) and the Sony A300 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Analyze the Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the WG-4 GPS vs the A300.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 GPS and A300 is 90 and 64 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-4 GPS and A300.

As you can see, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-4 GPS using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS will render extra detail with its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 GPS provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portrait photography with Sony A300
41
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
59
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
low megapixels (10MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography information
Sony A300 Street photography information
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
heavier than average in class (235 grams)
74
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography information
Sony A300 Sports photography information
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
max fps low (2.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (240 CIPA)
has no phase detect auto focus
54
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect auto focus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low megapixels (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography info
Sony A300 Travel photography info
69
environment proofing
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery power (240 CIPA)
heavier than average in class (235g)
display is not selfie friendly
45
has built in flash
missing Timelapse function
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Landscape photography highlights
Sony A300 Landscape photography highlights
54
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
environment proofing
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery power (240 per charge)
57
you can focus manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
low megapixels (10MP)
missing Timelapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 GPS Vlogging info
Sony A300 Vlogging info
34
decently wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic port
heavier than average in class (235g)
9
can't record video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony A300
 Ricoh WG-4 GPSSony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Manufacturer Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Type Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2014-02-05 2008-01-30
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 25-100mm (4.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 -
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter rate 2.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264 -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 235g (0.52 lbs) 632g (1.39 lbs)
Physical dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 64
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 538
Other
Battery life 240 shots -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID D-LI92 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal Compact Flash
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $210 $0