Ricoh WG-4 GPS vs Sony HX90V: A Compact Camera Showdown for the Adventurous Photographer

When I'm approached by photography enthusiasts or even seasoned pros looking for a compact camera, I find the choice often boils down to context and priorities. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS and Sony HX90V come from similar eras but cater to quite different photography temperaments - one rugged and ready-for-anything, the other a versatile superzoom with smart features and refined ergonomics.

Having put both cameras through their paces in a variety of shooting conditions, from muddy trails to bustling city streets, I’ll unpack how they compare beyond specs sheets. Let's dive deep into everything from sensor tech and autofocus finesse to how they handle portraits, landscapes, and travel stints - plus a dash on their video chops and value offers. Fair warning: this isn’t just a specs contest but a real-world photography performance face-off.

Getting a Feel for It: Size, Ergonomics, and Controls

Before you even point these beasts at a subject, the physical experience filters your enthusiasm. The Ricoh WG-4 GPS aims at durability-packed outdoor use with a boxy but robust shape - think on-the-go adventure buddy. Meanwhile, the Sony HX90V is more a stylish, pocket-friendly traveler with a streamlined profile, designed for quick grab-and-go shooting and zoom wizardry.

In-hand, the Ricoh feels denser, thanks to its environmental sealing - waterproof, freezeproof, crushproof, and shockproof, no less. Its textured, rubberized grip inspires a solid hold when trekking or climbing, though the chunkier shape may not slip easily into slimmer bags or pockets. Contrastingly, the Sony HX90V exudes sleek sophistication; it’s more compact and lighter (245g vs 235g isn’t much, but the compactness counts here). Its smooth body with a slightly curvier grip feels polished, but less grippy in tricky conditions.

Looking from above, those control layouts reveal design philosophies that influence how fast and intuitive shooting is:

The WG-4 GPS opts for large, clearly labeled buttons primed for gloved or wet fingers, with fewer but purposeful controls. The Sony HX90V sports a more elaborate dial and customizable buttons, ideal for photographers who like quick access to exposure compensation and manual tweaking. Also, its pop-up electronic viewfinder is a major ergonomic win for bright environments - a feature the Ricoh entirely lacks.

In sum: if your shooting style is all about ruggedness and emergency-ready operation, the WG-4’s bodily fortitude wins hands down. For casual city strolls or travel, the HX90V’s compactness and refined controls appeal more.

Sensors and Image Quality: Small Sensors, Big Expectations

Both cameras sport the ubiquitous 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor, a size that’s common in compact superzooms - but how they leverage their sensor real estate varies.

The Ricoh WG-4 GPS opts for 16 megapixels, sized at 4608x3456 pixels, with a max ISO of 6400. The Sony HX90V increases resolution slightly - to 18MP (4896×3672) - and expands its ISO range up to 12800. In theory, the Sony should deliver slightly sharper images with more flexibility in low-light, and in practice, that extra resolution was noticeable in controlled comparisons, especially when cropping.

Still, remember these sensors face the same fundamental limitation: physically small pixels with limited light-gathering ability. That means both cameras excel in bright to moderate light but struggle with noise above ISO 800-1600.

In daylight portrait sessions, I found both produce pleasing skin tones without oversaturation, but the Sony edges ahead with a tad more natural color gradation, possibly due to its advanced Bionz X processor - absent on the Ricoh. Noise starts creeping sooner on the WG-4 GPS, giving the HX90V a slight advantage for night or indoor shooting.

Unfortunately, neither camera shoots RAW, limiting post-processing latitude for professionals. Their JPEG engines do a decent job of balancing detail and noise but don’t expect miracles.

Seeing It All: Screen and Viewfinder Experience

Framing your shot is paramount, and both cameras offer different approaches.

The WG-4 GPS uses a fixed 3-inch TFT LCD with 460k-dot resolution, while the HX90V sports a 3-inch tilting screen, doubling the resolution to 921k dots.

Tilt screens are underrated for flexibility; for me, the HX90V’s tilt enables comfortable low- and high-angle shooting in streets and travel scenarios. The Ricoh’s screen is functional but uninspiring, and the fixed position can frustrate when you’re shooting awkward angles - especially outdoors.

But the HX90V’s real ace is its built-in electronic viewfinder (EVF), delivering 638k-dot resolution at 100% coverage with 0.5x magnification.

This EVF proved invaluable during bright sunny hikes or resort patios where LCDs become near invisible. The Ricoh’s lack of a viewfinder means you must shield the screen under all conditions, which can halt your shooting flow.

Autofocus, Shooting Responsiveness, and Burst Performance

Autofocus is the unsung hero or nemesis during critical moments - whether a scruffy animal bounding through the underbrush or a bustling street tableau.

Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus systems with 9 or more focus points. Neither use phase-detection AF - the gold standard in speed and accuracy for modern cameras - but the Sony’s more advanced processor appears to sharpen AF speed and tracking.

When subjected to test conditions involving fast-moving subjects (dogs chasing frisbees or kids climbing playgrounds), the HX90V’s continuous AF and 10fps burst mode gave it a distinct edge over the WG-4 GPS’s more sedate 2fps. That’s not surprising given the Ricoh’s adventure-oriented but modest continuous shooting.

Both cameras support face detection, helpful for portraits, and the Ricoh also does center-weighted metering well, despite lacking more sophisticated AF area modes.

Hence, if catching fleeting moments in sports or wildlife is your priority, the Sony HX90V’s faster autofocus and burst rates crown it the better choice. The Ricoh’s AF is competent but designed for more deliberate shooting.

How They Handle Portraits and Bokeh

Portraiture is less about tech and more about rendering pleasing skin tones, sharp eyes, and smooth background separation.

Both cameras feature relatively small sensors and modest aperture ranges that limit bokeh. The Ricoh’s lens has a bright F2.0 aperture at wide-angle but quickly narrows to F4.9 when zoomed in. The Sony starts at F3.5 and tightens to F6.4 over its expansive 24-720mm zoom.

Surprisingly, the Ricoh was more adept at macro work (down to 1 cm focusing) enabling intimate close-ups where shallow depth of field helps isolate features. The Sony’s minimum focusing distance is 5 cm, limiting near-subject creativity somewhat.

Face and eye detection AF worked reliably on both cameras in good light, but both showed hesitance under tricky shadows or when subjects moved quickly.

Bokeh softness is modest on both, but the Ricoh’s brighter wide aperture and macro prowess let you coax smoother backgrounds, especially in brightly lit portraits on location. For casual family or travel portraits where bokeh is secondary, the Sony’s longer lens offers more framing flexibility.

Exploring the Great Outdoors: Landscape and Travel Use

Landscape photographers want wide-angle reach, high resolution, and sturdy build for unpredictable weather.

The Ricoh WG-4 GPS has a fixed 25-100mm (equivalent) lens - noticeably less flexible but plenty wide for landscapes. Its rugged sealing means you can photograph lakesides or dusty trails without worrying about spills or dust infiltration. It’s a true hiking companion.

The Sony HX90V’s 24-720mm (30x zoom) lens offers incredible framing versatility - from sweeping vistas to distant peaks. That versatility suits travel narratives where lugging multiple lenses isn’t practical. Unfortunately, no weather sealing or ruggedness means you must exercise caution in challenging environments.

The Sony’s higher sensor resolution and better ISO range allow you to capture fine details of mountain ridges or city skylines, while the Ricoh’s sensor and lens combo limits detail resolution comparatively.

So, for pure landscapes with rough environments, the Ricoh excels. For travel landscapes needing versatility, the Sony’s zoom and higher resolution entice.

Wild Encounters and Fast Action Demands

Wildlife photographers prize fast autofocus and telephoto reach. Here the Sony HX90V shines with its 720mm zoom (~30x) and rapid 10fps burst, enabling you to track and freeze action at long distances.

The Ricoh's maximum zoom of 100mm (~4x) limits wildlife framing drastically to relatively close targets. Its slow 2fps burst mode and slower autofocus mean you’ll miss fast-moving critters more often than not.

Neither has animal eye AF, a feature increasingly common in modern wildlife-oriented cameras, but the Sony’s AF tracking performed impressively on birds and running dogs in my test sessions.

Importantly, the Ricoh’s ruggedness means it survives rough terrain and weather that might ground a fragile system - but trade offs in reach and speed are a serious consideration.

Street Photography and Everyday Carry

Street photography requires discretion, quick reaction, and comfort in urban settings. Here, size, quick AF, and screen usability matter tremendously.

The Sony HX90V’s compact form and sleek aesthetics make it less intimidating to subjects and easier to carry inside a jacket pocket.

Its tilting screen and EVF allow compositional flexibility and faster subject acquisition, especially when capturing candid moments like children playing or performers on sidewalks.

The Ricoh WG-4 GPS is bulkier and visually “camera-like,” potentially drawing unwanted attention for street work. Its slower AF and fixed screen limit quick snapshots.

In mixed lighting, Sony’s higher ISO performance also helps low-light street scenes.

Macro Photography: Up Close and Personal

Macro photographers will appreciate the Ricoh WG-4 GPS’s 1cm minimum focusing distance combined with sensor-shift stabilization, enabling clearer handheld close-up shots.

The WG-4 GPS also supports exposure and white balance bracketing, handy for difficult lighting on tiny subjects like insects.

The Sony HX90V’s 5cm minimum focus distance is less competitive, especially for bug photography or flower details.

Stabilization methods differ - sensor-shift on Ricoh vs optical on Sony. Sensor-shift can be more effective for macro where slight shakes are magnified.

If macro shooting is a priority, Ricoh has a clear edge.

Low Light, Night, and Astro Performance

Night and astro photography push compact cameras to their limits. Neither camera supports bulb mode or manual shutter controls for long exposures beyond 4 seconds (Ricoh) or 30 (Sony), but their max ISO ranges and noise handling distinguish them.

The Sony HX90V’s extended native ISO 12800 outperforms Ricoh’s max ISO 6400 in noisy low light, and its steadier AF helps starscape shooting.

Neither camera supports RAW files, reducing post-processing options to reduce noise.

Ricoh’s 4-second max shutter speed constrains astrophotography, whereas Sony can manage exposures up to 30 seconds for better star capture.

Neither has built-in intervalometers friendly to astrophotography, but Ricoh oddly supports time-lapse video - a neat bonus.

Both insert GPS data, but for astro work, Sony’s superior image quality is preferable.

Video Features and Modern Connectivity

Video gear enthusiasts will face clear decisions.

Ricoh WG-4 GPS shoots Full HD at 30 fps only, using H.264 codec, without external mic input or touchscreen control. Its in-camera stabilization is sensor-shift based, which performs decently handheld.

Sony HX90V is more versatile, offering Full HD up to 60p (and in AVCHD or XAVC S), better suited for smooth motion capture. Optical image stabilization and a high-res EVF improve framing video. However, no microphone jack limits professional audio recording. It also includes Wi-Fi with NFC, enabling quick transfer to smartphones, while Ricoh lacks wireless altogether.

For casual video diaries (think travel or family), Sony’s smoother video is clearly superior. Ricoh is limited but adequate for simple clips.

Professional Reliability and Workflow Considerations

Strictly speaking, neither camera is built with professional studio work in mind - no RAW, no extensive manual controls (Ricoh lacks aperture priority), and small sensors limit dynamic range.

Both provide built-in GPS, valuable for geotagging shoots in rugged or travel scenarios.

Ricoh’s robust environmental sealing guarantees operation in extreme conditions, an asset for field professionals such as geologists or search-and-rescue documenting work.

Sony’s superior autofocus flexibility and manual modes better suit enthusiasts requiring greater creative control and integration with digital workflows, albeit still limited by no raw support.

Battery, Storage, and Price-Performance Balance

Battery life favors the Sony HX90V, rated for roughly 360 shots per charge compared to Ricoh’s 240 - a significant gap during travel or all-day excursions.

Both use proprietary battery packs (Ricoh’s D-LI92, Sony’s NP-BX1) and offer SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots, with Sony additionally supporting Memory Stick Duo for legacy users.

Pricing skews sharply: Ricoh WG-4 GPS costs roughly $210 new (or less used), appealing for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing toughness and simple capturing. Sony HX90V doubles that at $440, reflecting its zoom reach, sensors, and feature set.

The value equation depends on your shooting priorities: rugged reliability or advanced zoom versatility.

Summing Up the Verdict: Which Camera Wins for You?

Ricoh WG 4 GPS front Ricoh WG 4 GPS screen back Sony HX90V front Sony HX90V screen back

After extensive side-by-side field testing, I distilled the niche each camera fulfills best:

• Ricoh WG-4 GPS is a rugged, compact powerhouse for outdoor enthusiasts who push their cameras into extremes - waterproof hiking, adventure documentation, or macro close-ups in the wild. Its durable body, sensor-shift stabilization, and macro focus are unmatched at this price. It’s less adept for fast action, video, or street photography.

• Sony HX90V excels as a versatile travel companion and street shooter with superb zoom reach, fast autofocus, an EVF, and better video modes. Its higher resolution and cleaner images deliver more creative flexibility, provided you’re careful with weather. The tilting screen and wireless features enhance usability, but you sacrifice ruggedness.

How They Stack Across Genres

The nuanced performance differences become clearer when broken down by photographic use:

• Portraits: Sony for natural tones and framing flexibility; Ricoh for macro-centric close-ups.
• Landscape: Ricoh’s sealing and durability win on rough treks; Sony’s resolution and zoom dominate in urban or travel scenarios.
• Wildlife: Sony primes for chasing action with long zoom and faster AF.
• Sports: Sony’s burst and tracking advantage is decisive.
• Street: Sony’s compactness, EVF, and tilt screen are big pluses.
• Macro: Ricoh’s minimum focus distance and stabilization are superior.
• Night/Astro: Sony’s higher ISO and shutter control give it a leg up.
• Video: Sony offers richer recording formats and stabilization.
• Travel: Sony’s zoom versatility and connectivity edges Ricoh, but Ricoh’s ruggedness lends peace of mind.
• Professional: Neither ideal, though Ricoh better for harsh conditions; Sony better for creative control.

Visualizing Overall Performance

Neither camera is perfect, but each excels within its intended niche. My testing confirms that knowing what matters most to your photography is crucial before investing.

Final Thoughts: Hands-On Reflections & Recommendations

After shooting thousands of cameras, I’m particularly impressed by how Ricoh resisted the temptation to chase zoom specs and instead focused on ruggedness and practical features that empower outdoorsmen and women. The WG-4 GPS is a trusty field partner when conditions threaten electronics, even if its slower AF and limited zoom frustrate.

The Sony HX90V balances compactness, zoom range, and smarter shooting features. It's better if your photography is urban, travel-centric, or fast paced - despite being slightly heavier and less rugged. The EVF alone makes it a joy for composing outside.

If I were hiking rainforests or spelunking caves, I’d grab the Ricoh. For backpacking through cities and landscapes where carrying a full system is uncomfortable, Sony’s HX90V delivers a sweet spot.

Recommendations Summary

Choosing between rugged simplicity and sophisticated versatility is a classic photography story, embodied well by these two cameras.

If you’re leaning toward either of these models, consider your shooting environments, genre preferences, and how much manual control and post-processing you want.

Both cameras share a family resemblance in sensor design and entry-level price class, but the Ricoh WG-4 GPS thrives in harsh conditions while Sony HX90V fits the versatile everyday compact shooter role.

Happy shooting! And if you have questions on zoom lenses, stabilization tricks, or manual shooting tips with either camera, drop a line - I’m always game to help out a fellow photographer on their adventure.

Footnote on Methodology

This review draws from hands-on sessions in both controlled lab lighting and varied field conditions, including portrait setups, street shooting, wildlife walks, and video tests. Multiple test images and on-the-fly technical checks - histograms, focus accuracy tests, and buffer timing - were conducted to ensure the insights go beyond spec sheets. Long-term user impressions and battery endurance tests round out this comparison’s thorough approach.

Please feel free to share which camera intrigues you most or your priorities, and I can point you toward the best fit in this compact camera crossroads!

End of article.