Clicky

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41
Ricoh WG-4 front
 
Samsung PL200 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Launched July 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Overview

Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung PL200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The WG-4 was launched 3 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-4 scores vs the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung PL200

 WG-4 PL200 
LaunchedFebruary 2014July 2010More recent by 44 months
Focus manually More precise focusing
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-4

 PL200 WG-4 

Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung PL200

 WG-4 PL200 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurement
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Neither offers Touch display

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison

In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 compared to the PL200.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and PL200.

As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Portrait photography info
Samsung PL200 Portrait photography info
41
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
28
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Ricoh WG-4
Street photography with Samsung PL200
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography info
Samsung PL200 Sports photography info
45
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
weather proofing
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (240 CIPA)
no phase detect AF
38
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Travel photography factors
Samsung PL200 Travel photography factors
72
weather proofing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
bad battery (240 CIPA)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
58
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 Landscape photography features
Samsung PL200 Landscape photography features
54
you can focus manually
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
bad battery (240 shots)
37
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Ricoh WG-4 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung PL200 as a Vlogging camera
36
rather wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no external microphone jack
25
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung PL200
 Ricoh WG-4Samsung PL200
General Information
Make Ricoh Samsung
Model Ricoh WG-4 Samsung PL200
Category Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2014-02-05 2010-07-21
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Min native ISO 125 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus distance 1cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 460 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech TFT LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 2.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (Auto ISO) 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264 H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 grams (0.51 lbs) 170 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 240 photos -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $330 $0