Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched July 2010
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung PL200, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. The image resolution of the WG-4 (16MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe WG-4 was launched 3 years later than the PL200 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a brief overview of how the WG-4 scores vs the PL200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Ricoh WG-4 & Samsung PL200. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery & Samsung PL200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung PL200
WG-4 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | July 2010 | More recent by 44 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Ricoh WG-4
PL200 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung PL200
WG-4 | PL200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 offers exterior measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung PL200 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Compare the Ricoh WG-4 versus Samsung PL200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the WG-4 compared to the PL200.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the WG-4 and PL200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by researching technical specs. The graphic underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and PL200.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different resolution. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung PL200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung PL200 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2010-07-21 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 170 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $330 | $0 |