Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2635/a26353e306f5e5c951dff9e713c562de823a4568" alt="Ricoh WG-4 front Ricoh WG-4 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b182/9b182629722a25b5055a8beb15efd8706ee32948" alt="Samsung SL30 front Samsung SL30 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
14 Overall
25
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 140g - 94 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is ES15
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Overview
Following is a in-depth analysis of the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-4 (16MP) and SL30 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The WG-4 was manufactured 5 years after the SL30 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the WG-4 grades vs the SL30 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung SL30. The entire galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-4 Gallery and Samsung SL30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Samsung SL30
WG-4 | SL30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | February 2009 | More modern by 61 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL30 over the Ricoh WG-4
SL30 | WG-4 |
---|
Common features in the Ricoh WG-4 and Samsung SL30
WG-4 | SL30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-4 has got outside measurements of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung SL30 has dimensions of 94mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-4 versus the SL30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7739c/7739c07cfeab7d2145630795271d98a68895a54c" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-4 and SL30 is 90 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ceb2d/ceb2dc6e6b1e7326f2bfb50f4bd56cc7080dd5c4" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out specifications. The pic underneath might provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-4 and SL30.
Plainly, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to provide greater detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent WG-4 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f870/0f870eaf748e1ad3222069acd4ace9c7c86b6514" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdfc1/cdfc11202566186807f60a70b754e2cba95d962b" alt="Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Ricoh WG-4 vs Samsung SL30 Specifications
Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung SL30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-4 | Samsung SL30 |
Alternative name | - | ES15 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-02-05 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 140g (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 94 x 61 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 240 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $330 | $93 |