Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
62 Imaging
45 Features
60 Overall
51
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced February 2014
- Older Model is Sony HX300
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Ricoh and Sony. The image resolution of the WG-50 (16MP) and the HX400V (20MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-50 was manufactured 3 years later than the HX400V and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX400V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the WG-50 matches up versus the HX400V when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-50 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. The entire galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Sony HX400V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sony HX400V
WG-50 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | February 2014 | Fresher by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX400V over the Ricoh WG-50
HX400V | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony HX400V
WG-50 | HX400V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-50 comes with physical dimensions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) whilst the Sony HX400V has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") along with a weight of 660 grams (1.46 lbs).
See the Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the WG-50 and the HX400V.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the WG-50 and HX400V is 91 and 62 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-50 and HX400V.
To sum up, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Sony HX400V to provide you with more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern WG-50 provides an edge in sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Sony |
Model type | Ricoh WG-50 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2017-05-24 | 2014-02-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash settings | On, off | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 193g (0.43 lbs) | 660g (1.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | D-LI92 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $280 | $448 |