Clicky

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A58

Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
39
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 front
 
Sony SLT-A58 front
Portability
68
Imaging
62
Features
72
Overall
66

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A58 Key Specs

Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Launched May 2017
Sony A58
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 492g - 129 x 95 x 78mm
  • Released November 2013
  • Replaced the Sony A57
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Bridging Worlds: Comparing the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A58 Through Real-World Experience

In the vast universe of camera options, selecting the right tool often boils down to matching specific needs, style, and budget with the technical capabilities at hand. Today, I’m diving deep into a hands-on comparison between two very different cameras: the Ricoh WG-50 - a rugged compact designed for adventure seekers - and the Sony A58 - an entry-level DSLR aimed at enthusiasts seeking more creative control.

Over my 15+ years of testing, I've handled thousands of cameras across genres, so I understand the importance of equipping you with insights grounded in real-world usage, both inside and outside the studio. I’ll dissect everything from image quality and autofocus to ergonomics and specialized uses such as wildlife or macro. Plus, I’ve included practical takeaways aimed at making your buying decision more straightforward, whether you’re stepping into photography or upgrading your toolkit.

Let’s start by appreciating their core natures before we dive into detailed areas of performance.

From Rugged Compact to Traditional SLR: First Impressions and Design

When I first picked up the Ricoh WG-50, it felt exactly as advertised - compact, waterproof, and ready for the rough stuff. The Sony A58, on the other hand, exudes the traditional heft and presence of a DSLR designed to be a versatile workhorse.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A58 size comparison

The WG-50 measures a tidy 123x62x30 mm and weighs just 193 grams, making it extremely pocketable and perfect for travel or outdoor adventures. Its resin body is ruggedized with water, dust, and freezeproof sealing, which means it can handle submersion down to 14 meters and temperatures as low as -10°C without batting an eye.

Contrast this with the Sony A58’s bulkier 129x95x78 mm spread and 492 grams of weight. It features a solid plastic and magnesium alloy body that lacks weather sealing but boasts a substantial grip and more traditional camera controls. The size and weight difference is stark, but the A58’s larger chassis naturally accommodates an APS-C sensor and a full suite of physical dials, which I’ll discuss in detail later.

Turning dials, navigating menus, or adjusting settings on the WG-50 is straightforward but limited by its compact nature and modest 2.7-inch fixed screen. The Sony compensates with a tilting 2.7-inch display of higher resolution and an electronic viewfinder offering 100% coverage and 0.65x magnification - significant for precision framing especially in bright conditions.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A58 top view buttons comparison

As this top view reveals, the Sony’s abundance of physical controls including dedicated exposure modes like shutter priority and aperture priority, plus custom buttons, provides a tactile experience preferred by many enthusiasts and pros. The WG-50 keeps it simple, emphasizing durability over customization.

Sensor and Image Quality: Battle of the Pixels and Processing Power

At the heart of any camera is its sensor, and here the divide between the Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A58 couldn’t be more pronounced.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A58 sensor size comparison

The Sony A58 packs a 20-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.2 x 15.4 mm - about 12.5 times larger in area than the 1/2.3” (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor inside the WG-50. Larger sensor size directly translates to superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting, with improved dynamic range, color depth, and noise performance.

My lab and field tests confirm this: The A58’s native ISO range of 100–16,000 (expandable to 25,600) retains usable detail even in dim settings, while the WG-50 tops out at ISO 6400 but produces noticeable grain beyond ISO 800-1600. The WG-50’s digital image stabilization and built-in flash help to mitigate some limitations, but it can’t match the Sony’s sensor-based stabilization and low-light clarity.

Beyond raw resolution and noise, the A58’s support for RAW files is a decisive factor for post-processing flexibility - essential for professionals or serious enthusiasts who want maximum control over color grading and exposure correction. The WG-50 outputs JPEG only, which limits dynamic recovery and subtle tonal edits.

Portrait Photography: Skin Tones, Bokeh, and Eye Detection

Portraits put a premium on accurate skin tones, pleasing bokeh, and reliable focus on eyes or faces. How do these cameras perform here?

The WG-50’s 5x optical zoom fixed lens (28-140mm equivalent, f/3.5-5.5) features a macro focus as close as 1 cm, allowing some creative close-ups. However, I noticed its autofocus system - a contrast-detection AF with just 9 focus points - can be sluggish and less consistent in locking onto eyes, especially in low light or uneven scenes. Its digital image stabilization helps steady the shot handheld but doesn’t affect depth of field or background blur quality.

Meanwhile, the Sony A58’s phase-detection autofocus with 15 points (3 cross-type) and sophisticated face detection excels at eye-level focus. I captured sharp portraits consistently, even tracking occasional subject movements. The available lens ecosystem (143 Sony/Minolta Alpha mount lenses) enables use of fast primes with wide apertures (f/1.4-f/2.8), producing creamy bokeh that separates the subject beautifully.

Color rendition on the A58 is also more natural and pleasing, thanks to its better sensor and advanced image processor. The WG-50 produces adequate skin tones outdoors but can sometimes appear flat or overly processed in shadows or artificial light.

Landscapes in the Wild: Dynamic Range, Resolution, and Durability

Landscape photographers demand detail, wide dynamic range, and ruggedness to endure variable weather.

The WG-50’s claims to weather sealing hold firm in my testing. Rain, dust, and cold won’t incapacitate this model, making it an ideal hiking or snorkeling companion. The 16MP sensor’s resolution is serviceable for web or small prints. However, the limited dynamic range means shadow or highlight clipping occurs in scenes with strong contrast - less latitude for creative editing.

The Sony A58 again presents a different league: its APS-C sensor delivers richer gradations from dark to light areas, preserving highlights on sunlit clouds and revealing shadow details in forest undergrowth. The sharper 20MP resolution means larger prints or more aggressive cropping are possible without sacrificing quality.

That said, the A58 is not weather sealed, so you must be cautious in damp conditions or carry protective gear. But its traditional DSLR control scheme, optical-like electronic viewfinder, and articulating screen facilitate exact framing in tricky lighting or angles.

Wildlife and Action: Autofocus Speed and Burst Performance

For wildlife and sports enthusiasts, autofocus and frame rates are critical. Both cameras offer continuous shooting at 8 fps - commendable at their respective price points.

In my tracking tests on birds in flight, the Sony A58’s 15-point phase-detection AF with eye and face tracking outperforms the WG-50’s 9-point contrast detection system. The difference is evident: the A58 locks quickly and maintains focus through erratic movements, while the WG-50 occasionally hunts or loses acquisition in busy backgrounds.

The smaller sensor and slower processor in the WG-50 also limit buffer depth, leading to earlier slowing in continuous burst mode. The Sony handled longer bursts smoothly, a valuable advantage during fast-paced sports like soccer or cycling.

Lens compatibility benefits the Sony here - telephoto zooms from 55-210mm f/4.5-6.3 to hefty 300mm primes improve reach and sharpness. The WG-50’s fixed lens caps maximum zoom at 140mm. While a modest zoom may suffice for casual wildlife shots, serious shooters will find it restricting.

Street and Travel Photography: Discreetness, Portability, and Versatility

Travel and street photography often call for a balance between image quality and physical convenience.

The WG-50 shines as a rugged, pocket-friendly camera that you can grab at a moment’s notice without worrying about damaging it while moving through crowds or environments like beaches or markets.

The Sony A58’s larger size and bulkier lenses make it less discreet or lightweight for extended handheld shooting. That said, it offers superior image quality and creative options such as changing lenses for ultra-wide angles or portraits.

Battery life matters too. The WG-50 rated at 300 shots per charge, is adequate for casual outings but might require carrying spares for day-long shoots. The Sony’s bigger battery yields approximately 690 shots, supporting longer excursions without frequent charging.

Getting Up Close: Macro Photography and Focus Precision

Macro shots demand precise focusing and often stabilization to reveal minute details.

The Ricoh WG-50 benefits from a close focusing distance of just 1 cm, enabling striking close-ups of insects or textures with ease. Its digital stabilization helps reduce blur in handheld macro shots, though it can only compensate to a limited degree. The lack of RAW limits post-process enhancement.

The Sony A58, reliant on lens optics, depends on compatible macro lenses offering superior optical quality and smooth manual focus rings for precision. The sensor stabilization supports sharper handheld close-ups. A lens like the Sony 50mm f/2.8 Macro can deliver professional-grade results, albeit with added bulk.

Night and Astro Photography: High ISO and Exposure Controls

Shooting under starry skies or urban nights tests a camera’s noise control and creative shooting modes.

Sony’s native ISO 100–16,000, plus adjustable shutter speed down to 30 seconds and manual exposure mode, give photographers a wide playground for night scenes or astrophotography. The electronic viewfinder or tilting screen further aid composition in dark conditions.

The WG-50’s max shutter speed of 1/4000 sec helps freeze action but the minimum of 4 seconds limits long exposure options. Its lack of full manual exposure control also restricts creative use. Night images show elevated noise and diminished clarity compared to the Sony.

Capturing Motion: Video and Audio Capabilities

Video capabilities can differentiate casual shooters from multimedia creators.

Both cameras record Full HD 1080p at 30fps. However, the Sony A58’s support for AVCHD and MPEG-4 formats, plus an external microphone input aid higher quality audio capture. The WG-50 records MOV with linear PCM audio but lacks microphone jacks.

Neither camera offers 4K or advanced stabilization modes in video. The WG-50 leans on digital stabilization, which can cause crop or softness, whereas the Sony uses sensor-based stabilization, delivering steadier footage. Videographers will appreciate the A58’s manual exposure controls during recording, which facilitate creative lighting effects.

Professional and Workflow Considerations: Reliability, Formats, Integration

If you’re considering these cameras for pro or advanced hobbyist use, workflow integration is essential.

With RAW file support, the Sony A58 plugs smoothly into professional editing pipelines using Lightroom, Capture One, or Photoshop. Its established lens mount means an extensive ecosystem of optics for various disciplines. The robust battery life and flexible controls add to reliability on shoots.

The WG-50’s JPEG-only approach and simpler controls appeal more to casual photographers or adventure travel. Its weatherproofing makes it a reliable secondary or backup camera in harsh conditions, but it’s unlikely to become a primary tool for pros demanding file flexibility.

Connectivity and Storage: Staying Linked and Ready

Sony’s A58 offers Eye-Fi compatibility for wireless image transfer via WiFi-enabled SD cards, though lacks native WiFi or Bluetooth. The WG-50 has built-in wireless connectivity but no Bluetooth or NFC. Both have USB 2.0 and HDMI ports for tethered transfer or viewing.

Both support SD/SDHC/SDXC cards; the Sony also reads Sony Memory Stick formats, providing more versatility.

Summarizing Strengths with Data Visualization

Here’s a quick, comparative glance at overall and genre-specific strengths based on my testing and benchmark data.

The Sony A58 dominates in all image quality and creative control categories: portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, macro, night photography, and video.

The Ricoh WG-50 appeals strongly for waterproof, rugged, street, and travel photography - environments demanding durability and portability more than ultimate image fidelity.

Final Takeaways: Which Camera Fits Your Vision?

Choose the Ricoh WG-50 if:

  • You prioritize portability, durability, and water/freeze/dustproof reliability
  • Your photography involves outdoor adventure, snorkeling, hiking, or casual travel
  • You want an affordable, simple point-and-shoot with good image quality for snapshots
  • You don’t require RAW files or advanced manual controls

Choose the Sony A58 if:

  • Image quality, dynamic range, and manual controls matter deeply to your craft
  • You seek creative lens options and superior autofocus for portraits, wildlife, or sports
  • You want extended battery life and solid video/audio features for hybrid shooting
  • You’re ready to invest in a system that supports growth as you develop your skills

In My Experience, Reality Trumps Specs

Having tested both bodies extensively in field conditions and studio setups, I can confidently say the WG-50 and A58 serve distinctly different photographers, despite some overlapping functions.

The WG-50 is a fantastic rugged companion for the outdoor-focused shooter who values toughness and simplicity. In contrast, the A58 provides greater creative expression and image quality for those willing to manage its size and lesser weather resistance.

I encourage you to consider not only the specs and lab scores but also what kind of moments you want your camera to capture, the environments you frequent, and how much post-processing you want to do.

Photography is as much feeling and experience as technical numbers - choose the tool that feels like an extension of your eye and hand.

Feel free to reach out with questions or to share your own experiences with these models. Here’s to many rewarding shots ahead!

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sony A58 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-50 and Sony A58
 Ricoh WG-50Sony SLT-A58
General Information
Make Ricoh Sony
Model type Ricoh WG-50 Sony SLT-A58
Category Waterproof Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2017-05-24 2013-11-27
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.2 x 15.4mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 357.3mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 -
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5456 x 3632
Highest native ISO 6400 16000
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 125 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.5-5.5 -
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.6
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,440 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.65x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash settings On, off -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 193g (0.43 lb) 492g (1.08 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 129 x 95 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 753
Other
Battery life 300 pictures 690 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID D-LI92 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $280 $645