Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aca2/6aca200b93ad4b88a49fc4b4a06d30e7e8a7882d" alt="Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung EX2F, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Ricoh and Samsung. The resolution of the WG-M1 (14MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is pretty similar but the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The WG-M1 was manufactured 22 months later than the EX2F which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the WG-M1 scores versus the EX2F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are available at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung EX2F
WG-M1 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2014 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 22 months |
Screen resolution | 115k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Ricoh WG-M1
EX2F | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung EX2F
WG-M1 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with physical dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Contrast the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung EX2F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the EX2F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4341e/4341e264aee1826bbf2f3ecd9d42a03f65ea8538" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and EX2F is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/797aa/797aa9568d19f8668e73f28b61dacb1038d0de7f" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the WG-M1 and EX2F.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Ricoh WG-M1 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger WG-M1 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb384/eb384a64916bcca39bbbfdf140515180e65f9ec5" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9fd6/a9fd6ff8e37e0407ace758e77c6691f0e075f309" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung EX2F |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-09-12 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | (1×) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 1.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 115 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lbs) | 294 grams (0.65 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | DB-65 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $2,000 | $478 |