Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Other Name is ES55
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a extended analysis of the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung SL102, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe WG-M1 was revealed 5 years after the SL102 which is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the WG-M1 matches up against the SL102 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung SL102
| WG-M1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 70 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| SL102 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.5" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung SL102
| WG-M1 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Absent Touch display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys exterior measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Take a look at the Ricoh WG-M1 versus Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 against the SL102.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and SL102 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The image below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and SL102.
To sum up, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to offer greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | (1×) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 1.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 115 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 190g (0.42 lbs) | 116g (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | DB-65 | - |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $2,000 | $130 |