Samsung CL5 vs Sony a5000
95 Imaging
32 Features
14 Overall
24


89 Imaging
62 Features
62 Overall
62
Samsung CL5 vs Sony a5000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Also Known as PL10
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced January 2014
- Older Model is Sony NEX-3N
- Replacement is Sony a5100

A Deep Dive into the Samsung CL5 vs Sony Alpha a5000: Which Compact Shooter Fits Your Frame?
In the world of compact digital cameras, the line between casual snapshots and serious image-making can be surprisingly thin. Today, I’m unpacking two distinct contenders from different eras and classes, yet both intriguing in their own right: Samsung’s 2009 ultracompact CL5 (aka PL10) and Sony’s 2014 entry-level mirrorless Alpha a5000. Having handled both extensively, we’ll explore how these cameras compare across key facets like image quality, build, usability, and genre-specific strengths - helping you decide which may still deserve a spot in your kit, or at least help understand the shifting tides in camera technology.
First Impressions: Size, Ergonomics, and Handling
The Samsung CL5 proudly wears its ultracompact badge with minimalism as its hallmark. It’s sleek and incredibly pocketable, weighing just 141g with physical dimensions roughly 93x60x19mm. Its slim profile makes it ideal for spontaneous street shots or travel where baggage minimalism reigns supreme. But, that ultra-compact form comes at a cost in handling and control.
In contrast, the Sony a5000 is more of a deliberate entry-level mirrorless camera - bigger, heavier, and clearly designed for users who want more photographic latitude. At 269g and 110x63x36mm, it’s still lighter than many DSLRs but notably chunkier than the CL5. Its grip and layout lean toward more comfortable, longer shooting sessions. The deeper body offers a better handhold, which I always appreciate during wildlife or sports shoots where stability matters.
One of the biggest takeaways here: Samsung’s CL5 favors pocket-sized convenience with simple, button-minimalistic operation, while Sony’s a5000 hints at more serious use with physical dials and a grip designed for control. The CL5’s lack of manual controls means you’ll rely heavily on auto modes, good enough for casual snapshots but limiting for composition-conscious shooters.
Design and Control Layout: Intuitive or Spartan?
Peeling back the layers to layout and controls, the contrast sharpens. The CL5’s top panel is essentially void of dedicated control dials or adjustable settings, emphasizing simplicity. This dog is mostly point-and-shoot territory - there’s no shutter speed or aperture priority, no exposure compensation, and no manual exposure whatsoever.
Sony a5000, meanwhile, has a thoughtfully arranged top deck that hints at its capabilities, including Mode Dial, exposure compensation button, and a modest but functional zoom toggle around the shutter release. While not a professional layout, the controls put important parameters and shooting modes within thumb’s reach, enabling a more flexible shooting approach especially in semi-auto or manual modes.
The takeaway for photographers here: If you want quick grab-and-go simplicity or a backup pocket camera, the CL5’s barebones interface might suit you. For learners or enthusiasts ready to explore creative settings or shoot faster bursts (when available), the Sony a5000’s controls are a smarter fit.
The Heart of the Matter: Sensor Technology & Image Quality
Here is where their age and class differences really resonate. The CL5 hosts a tiny 1/2.5” CCD sensor with a resolution of 9 megapixels - respectable for 2009 but modest by today’s standards. Its sensor area is just about 24.74mm². The CCD architecture tends to produce decent colors and image depth but struggles with noise and dynamic range, especially in lower light.
On the other hand, Sony a5000 boasts a 20-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor, a much larger 357.28mm², and a cutting-edge Bionz X processor powering its image crunching. This sensor size and resolution establish the a5000 as a far superior image quality provider in practically every lighting condition.
From a practical standpoint, this means the Sony delivers richer color depth, far greater dynamic range, reduced noise at high ISOs, and sharper detail thanks to the larger sensor and higher resolution. The CL5 is best reserved for well-lit situations and casual sharing, while the a5000 can hold its own for professional output or serious hobbyist printing.
Viewing the World: LCD and Interface Realities
Neither camera includes an electronic viewfinder, which simplifies design but impacts shooting styles. Both rely on rear LCDs for composition.
The CL5’s 2.7-inch fixed screen offers basic 230k-dot resolution - adequate, but far from crisp. Color fidelity and visibility under bright sunlight are underwhelming, making framing challenging outdoors.
In contrast, the a5000’s 3-inch tilting TFT LCD with 461k-dot resolution is a joy to use. The tilt mechanism allows comfortable high- or low-angle shooting, vastly improving versatility in landscape or street settings. Though not a touchscreen, its responsiveness when coupled with physical controls makes for an intuitive live view experience.
Interface-wise, the a5000’s menu system and options pack a wealth of exposure modes, white balance customization, and live histogram display, supporting advanced photographers. The Samsung is aimed more at minimal interaction, with fewer menus and options to wade through.
Autofocus and Speed: Getting the Shot When It Counts
Autofocus performance is a critical metric, especially across wildlife, sports, or street genres.
The CL5 uses contrast-detection autofocus - standard fare for compacts - with single AF mode only and no continuous tracking. It features center-weighted AF and face detection but lacks advanced options like tracking moving subjects or multi-point AF arrays. Result? It’s slow to lock focus and can struggle with fast or erratically moving subjects.
Sony a5000, although lacking phase-detection AF on sensor, packs 25 contrast-detection points with continuous AF and tracking. While not top-tier AF by 2024 standards, it’s considerably more responsive and accurate than the CL5’s rudimentary system. This allows it to handle moderate action sequences and pursue moving subjects with confidence.
Practically, I found the a5000’s AF athletic enough for casual sports and wildlife, whereas the CL5 is best reserved for static scenes or relaxed shooting.
Zoom and Optics: Fixed Pocket Zoom vs Interchangeable Freedom
The Samsung CL5 sports a fixed 3x zoom lens covering 38-114mm equivalent range, aperture F3.5-4.5. This glass is compact and convenient but optically limited. Sharpness suffers near 114mm, and maximum aperture restricts low-light capability or shallow depth of field effects.
The Sony a5000 benefits enormously from its interchangeable E-mount system with availability of over 120 lenses - from super wides to super telephotos, primes to macros. This versatility enables photographers to optimize for any genre or creativity need. Whether portrait bokeh, ultra-wide landscapes, or fast wildlife telephotos, the lens ecosystem elevates the a5000 profoundly over fixed lens systems like the CL5.
Image Stabilization: Who’s Shaky Here?
Both cameras lack in-body image stabilization (IBIS). The Samsung CL5 does not offer optical or digital IS, which can limit handheld shooting options, especially in dim or macro scenarios.
Sony a5000’s kit lenses sometimes feature optical stabilization, easing handheld in many situations. The absence of IBIS is felt, but overall handled better due to better lenses and body ergonomics.
Video Capabilities: From Scratchy Clips to Full HD
For casual videographers, Samsung’s CL5 records VGA resolution video at 640x480 pixels and just 30fps in Motion JPEG format. This results in low-quality clips by modern standards - compare to a nostalgic home video in early digital days.
The Sony a5000 steps up with full HD (1920x1080) recording at 60i/24p in MPEG-4 and AVCHD codecs, affording much better compression efficiency, detail, and color. While no 4K or microphone input hampers professional video usage, the a5000’s video is sufficiently sharp and smooth for YouTube, travel vlogs, or family memories.
Battery Life and Connectivity: How Long and How Smart?
Battery life is a notable advantage for the a5000, rated at approximately 420 shots per charge with its NP-FW50 battery - remarkable for a mirrorless camera of its class. The Samsung CL5’s battery life is unspecified but likely modest given its small size and era.
Connectivity-wise, the CL5 offers no wireless features or USB output, making image transfer cumbersome, relying on memory card readers.
Conversely, the Sony a5000 includes built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, enabling quick pairing with smartphones for remote shooting or image sharing - a big convenience in today’s connected photography landscape. USB 2.0 and HDMI micro ports increase workflow versatility.
Build Quality and Environmental Considerations
Both cameras lack weather sealing, dustproofing, or shockproofing - neither intended for extreme outdoor use. The CL5 is ultra-light but at the cost of durability; the a5000’s solid plastic body feels more resilient yet not rugged.
Genre-Specific Performance: How Do They Stack Up?
Taking our knowledge into different photography disciplines, I catalogued their core competencies and limitations.
Portraits:
The a5000’s larger sensor and lens options deliver superior skin tones, beautiful bokeh, and consistent eye detection autofocus, elevating portrait work. The CL5’s small sensor struggles with subject isolation and noisier images in low light - adequate for family snapshots, less so for artistic portraiture.
Landscape:
Dynamic range and resolution favor the a5000’s APS-C sensor, producing richer details in shadows and highlights. The CL5’s sensor limitations restrict image depth and fine detail capture. Neither camera offers weather sealing critical for landscape trekking.
Wildlife & Sports:
The a5000’s faster continuous AF (4fps) and tracking improve success on moving subjects. The CL5’s contrast AF and slow responsiveness limit it to static or slow-moving subjects. Telephoto lens options with the Sony further this advantage.
Street Photography:
The CL5 has an edge in stealth and portability - ultra-compact size won't intimidate subjects. Yet the a5000’s superior image quality and tilt screen for awkward angles make it a solid street shooter given its modest bulk.
Macro:
Neither shines here, but the CL5’s 5cm macro focus allows simple close-ups. The a5000’s lens ecosystem provides true macro lenses, vastly improving detail and magnification.
Night/Astro:
Sony’s superior high ISO performance and longer exposures trump the CL5’s noisy and limited ISO ceiling. Neither camera excels in astro, but the a5000 is the better candidate.
Video:
The a5000 provides full HD video suitable for casual creation. The CL5’s VGA video is obsolete as a recording solution.
Overall Performance Scores and Value Assessment
The Sony a5000 scores substantially higher (79 DxOMark overall vs. no testing for CL5), reflective of sensor tech, autofocus, and video prowess. The CL5 is more a relic of early digital compacts - useful for nostalgia or very casual use, but outmatched technically.
Value-wise, the CL5’s launch price was about $391; the a5000 initially retailed around $448 and still represents a strong used-market purchase today for budget-conscious enthusiasts seeking mirrorless entry.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations
The Samsung CL5 remains a charming pocket companion if you prize extreme compactness above all. It’s best in bright light, casual everyday shooting, or vacation scenarios where you want a tiny, no-fuss snapper.
The Sony a5000, while older by mirrorless standards, offers substantially upgraded imaging, control, and versatility. Its APS-C sensor, lenses, and connectivity provide a foundation to grow photographic skills across many genres - from portraits to landscapes and light sports.
If you’re a beginner eager to learn manual settings, want better results in low light, or plan to expand your lens collection eventually, the a5000 is the wiser pick.
If you need a highly portable camera that slips in your pocket and mostly shoots on auto with decent image quality for social media, the CL5 will suffice, budget permitting.
In the grander scheme, the a5000 embodies the transition era from compacts to mirrorless systems that has shaped today’s market. As cameras continue evolving post-2014, its strengths still echo modern demands: larger sensors, flexible lenses, and smart connectivity.
Summary Table for Quick Reference
Feature | Samsung CL5 | Sony a5000 |
---|---|---|
Sensor | 1/2.5" CCD, 9MP | APS-C CMOS, 20MP |
Lens | Fixed 38-114mm F3.5-4.5 | Interchangeable Sony E mount |
AF | Contrast detection, single | 25-point contrast detection, continuous |
Max ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Video | VGA 640x480 MJPEG | Full HD 1080p MPEG-4/AVCHD |
Screen | 2.7” fixed, 230k dots | 3.0” tilting, 461k dots |
Weight | 141g | 269g |
Connectivity | None | Wi-Fi, NFC, HDMI, USB 2.0 |
Price (launch) | ~$391 | ~$448 |
In conclusion, while both cameras reflect their era and class, the Sony a5000’s technological edge and creative potential make it a standout for enthusiasts and learners. The Samsung CL5 remains a neat, pocket-sized point-and-shoot with simplicity at its core. Choose the one that fits your shooting style and ambitions most closely.
Happy shooting, wherever your photographic journey leads!
Samsung CL5 vs Sony a5000 Specifications
Samsung CL5 | Sony Alpha a5000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung CL5 | Sony Alpha a5000 |
Also referred to as | PL10 | - |
Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2009-02-23 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.5" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 5.744 x 4.308mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
Sensor area | 24.7mm² | 357.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 9MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3456 x 2592 | 5456 x 3632 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 38-114mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-4.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Crop factor | 6.3 | 1.6 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD with 180 upward tilt |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i/24p), 1440 x 1080 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 141g (0.31 lb) | 269g (0.59 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") | 110 x 63 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1089 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $391 | $448 |