Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
79 Imaging
69 Features
57 Overall
64
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Released January 2010
- Alternate Name is ST5500
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0-22.0) lens
- 482g - 113 x 65 x 70mm
- Released February 2013
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Overview
The following is a extended analysis of the Samsung CL80 and Sony RX1, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Samsung and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the CL80 (14MP) and RX1 (24MP) and the CL80 (1/2.3") and RX1 (Full frame) have totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe CL80 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the RX1 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony RX1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the CL80 matches up vs the RX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung CL80 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung CL80 Gallery and Sony RX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Sony RX1
CL80 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.7" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1 over the Samsung CL80
RX1 | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2013 | January 2010 | Newer by 38 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen resolution | 1229k | 230k | Sharper screen (+999k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung CL80 and Sony RX1
CL80 | RX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Samsung CL80 provides outer dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Sony RX1 has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 482 grams (1.06 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung CL80 and Sony RX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the CL80 and the RX1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the CL80 and RX1 is 95 and 79 respectively.
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching technical specs. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the CL80 and RX1.
As you have seen, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The CL80 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony RX1 will render extra detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged CL80 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung CL80 vs Sony RX1 Specifications
Samsung CL80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung CL80 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1 |
Also called | ST5500 | - |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-01-06 | 2013-02-19 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4334 x 3256 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 4800 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-217mm (7.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.3-5.5 | f/2.0-22.0 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 1,229k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | Xtra FineTFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic and Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | 6.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 482 grams (1.06 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") | 113 x 65 x 70mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 93 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 25.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 2534 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 270 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $400 | $2,798 |