Samsung DV300F vs Sony WX80
96 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36


96 Imaging
39 Features
38 Overall
38
Samsung DV300F vs Sony WX80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 133g - 95 x 57 x 18mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Increase to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-8.0) lens
- 124g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Released January 2013

Samsung DV300F vs. Sony Cyber-shot WX80: An In-Depth Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Choosing the right compact camera can often feel like a balancing act between size, capability, and image quality. Today, we take a detailed look at two small sensor compacts from respected brands: the Samsung DV300F and the Sony Cyber-shot WX80. Both designed for casual yet capable photography, these models pack different strengths despite their similar sensor sizes. Drawing on hands-on testing and years of experience, this article unpacks everything from image quality to ergonomics, helping you decide which one fits your photographic needs best.
Getting to Know the Contenders: Compact Cameras with Big Ambitions
Before diving into performance, let’s familiarize ourselves with these two cameras.
Samsung DV300F – Released in early 2012, the DV300F introduces a fixed 25-125mm (5x) zoom lens, an f/2.5-6.3 aperture range, and a 16 MP 1/2.3" CCD sensor. Samsung’s focus here is accessible photography with basic controls and optical image stabilization, targeting casual users who want simplicity and built-in wireless connectivity.
Sony Cyber-shot WX80 – Launched a year later in 2013, the WX80 steps up with an 8x zoom (28-224mm equivalent), a BSI-CMOS 16 MP sensor, and more advanced video capabilities including 1080p at 60fps. It is also designed to be a compact everyday camera but leans toward more performance flexibility with touch autofocus and faster continuous shooting.
Both cameras occupy the compact category yet differ significantly in terms of technical specs and operational sophistication. Let’s go further.
Physical Design and User Interface: Comfort Meets Control
A camera’s size, weight, and button layout play an enormous role in how enjoyable it is to use - something I always check during field tests.
Samsung DV300F sits just under 95x57x18 mm and weighs 133 grams, marginally larger and heavier than the WX80. It features a fixed 3” TFT LCD with a resolution of 460k dots offering decent clarity, though the screen is not touch-enabled.
Sony WX80, on the other hand, is more compact with dimensions of 92x52x22 mm and lighter at 124 grams. It sports a 2.7” TFT LCD but with lower resolution at 230k dots and also no touchscreen support.
In terms of controls, neither sports an electronic viewfinder, so you rely on their LCDs for composing shots. The DV300F keeps things simple with fewer physical buttons, which might appeal to beginners. The WX80 adds touch autofocus on the LCD, enhancing focusing ease - a feature I found helpful when shooting moving subjects.
User Interface Summary:
Feature | Samsung DV300F | Sony WX80 |
---|---|---|
Size (mm) | 95 x 57 x 18 | 92 x 52 x 22 |
Weight (g) | 133 | 124 |
Screen Size & Res. | 3” / 460k dots | 2.7” / 230k dots |
Touchscreen | No | No (Touch AF only) |
External Controls | Basic physical buttons | Physical buttons + touch AF |
Viewfinder | None | None |
Verdict: If you prioritize a sharp, larger screen and straightforward operation, the Samsung may suit you better. For those who want a slightly smaller camera with smart focusing aids, Sony’s WX80 shows an edge.
Sensor and Image Quality: CCD vs BSI-CMOS
Both cameras employ a 1/2.3" sensor measuring 6.17x4.55 mm with a 16MP resolution (4608x3456 pixels), but with notably different sensor technologies.
- Samsung DV300F uses a CCD sensor, known traditionally for good color rendition but less adept in low light due to noise issues and slower readout speeds.
- Sony WX80 opts for a Backside-Illuminated CMOS sensor (BSI-CMOS). This sensor type enhances light gathering efficiency and noise performance, especially in dim conditions.
Having tested similar CCD-based compacts in the past, I noticed the Samsung struggled more with high ISO noise and dynamic range compared to Sony’s CMOS sensors. The WX80 also offers ISO up to 12800 (boosted), whereas the DV300F maxes at ISO 3200. This difference translates into better image performance in challenging light for the Sony.
Color and Dynamic Range
Both cameras support custom white balance and include an anti-aliasing filter, important to mitigate moiré patterns, especially when shooting fine details.
The Samsung displays slightly warmer color tones out of the box, which might appeal for skin tones and casual portraits, while Sony produces a more neutral and arguably accurate color palette suitable for versatile photography.
Dynamic range remains limited in both cameras due to the sensor size, but in my hands-on comparisons, WX80 handled shadows and highlights more gracefully, retaining more detail in bright skies when shooting landscapes.
Autofocus Capabilities: Speed and Tracking
Focus accuracy and speed can make or break a shooting experience, especially for action or wildlife photography.
Both cameras have a center-weighted focus area and face detection, but:
- Samsung DV300F uses contrast-detection autofocus with limited AF modes; it supports focus tracking but no continuous AF or touch AF. Its autofocus is slower, often noticeable when zooming telephoto.
- Sony WX80 features contrast-detection with touch AF via screen, single AF with face detection, and also supports AF tracking. The camera can shoot up to 10 fps continuous bursts, which is remarkable for a compact and useful for fast subjects.
In practical usage, the Sony WX80’s autofocus felt more responsive - particularly when locking onto human faces or tracking moving objects across the frame. The Samsung’s AF felt laggier and less confident in low contrast scenes.
Lens Zoom Range and Aperture: Flexibility vs Brightness
- Samsung DV300F: 25-125 mm equivalent zoom with a bright aperture of f/2.5 at wide angle, which narrows to f/6.3 telephoto.
- Sony WX80: 28-224 mm equivalent zoom offering more reach at 8x but with a smaller aperture, starting at f/3.3 wide and f/8 telephoto.
Implications:
- Samsung’s bright aperture at wide angle favors indoor shooting and shallow depth of field portraits.
- Sony’s extra 8x zoom makes it a better candidate for capturing distant subjects like wildlife and sports, albeit with slower lens speed affecting low light performance at the tele end.
Performance in Photography Genres
With the technical specs mapped out, let’s evaluate how these cameras stack up in different photography disciplines based on hands-on tests.
Portrait Photography
- Samsung DV300F: The slightly faster lens at wide end (f/2.5) lets you create softer background blur (bokeh), useful for isolating subjects. Face detection autofocus works, but with limited focusing points and no eye detection.
- Sony WX80: Skin tones are rendered naturally thanks to the BSI-CMOS sensor. The touch AF and face detection help get quick focus on eyes, although depth of field is harder to control due to narrower aperture.
Landscape Photography
Both cameras share the same sensor size limiting dynamic range. However:
- The WX80’s broader zoom allows framing flexibility in landscapes.
- Samsung’s brighter lens captures slightly better in low light dawn/dusk shots.
Neither features weather sealing, so caution in harsh environments is necessary.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Sony WX80 wins out here due to the 8x zoom and faster continuous shooting at 10 fps. Autofocus tracking is efficient within the constraints of fixed lens compacts.
- Samsung DV300F lacks continuous shooting and has slower autofocus, making it less comfortable for fast action.
Street Photography
Portability and discretion are key:
- Samsung is marginally larger but lighter; its bright aperture at wide angle benefits low-light street scenarios.
- Sony’s smaller size and quieter shutter (tested in controlled environments) support candid shooting, but slower lens limits low light.
Macro Photography
Both cameras focus as close as 5 cm, with optical stabilization aiding sharpness.
- Samsung’s lens has a slightly wider aperture; may offer better subject isolation.
- Sony’s autofocus is touch-enabled on screen, simplifying macro focus control.
Night and Astrophotography
Small sensors face challenges here:
- Sony WX80 pushes ISO 12800 boosted and supports 1080p video at 60 fps - useful in low light.
- Samsung max ISO 3200 limits noise-free night shooting.
Neither supports bulb mode or specialized astro exposures, restricting serious night photography.
Video Capabilities: HD with Practical Usability
In recent years, video support has become essential:
Feature | Samsung DV300F | Sony WX80 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 (HD) @ 30fps | 1920x1080 (Full HD) @ 60fps |
Video Formats | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
Audio Ports | None | None |
Slow Motion | No | No |
The Sony WX80 clearly leads with Full HD recording at 60 fps allowing smooth motion capture, while Samsung maxes out at HD 720p. Both lack microphone input or headphone jacks, limiting audio control.
During testing, WX80 footage was sharper with better detail retention and less noise in dim conditions.
Build Quality and Environmental Resistance
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged durability. Both are built primarily from plastic with different finish quality:
- Samsung feels slightly more robust in the hand but doesn’t inspire professional confidence.
- Sony is lighter and thinner but more molded plastic, emphasizing pocket portability.
Battery Life and Storage
Feature | Samsung DV300F | Sony WX80 |
---|---|---|
Battery Model | BP88 | NP-BN |
Battery Life | Not specified | Approx 240 shots |
Storage Media | MicroSD / MicroSDHC / Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick |
Slots | 1 | 1 |
Sony's battery life rated at about 240 shots suits daily casual work, while Samsung lacks official battery life data, which in tests translates to moderate shooting capacity.
Connectivity and Extras
Both cameras compete on wireless connectivity with built-in WiFi:
- Samsung DV300F has optional GPS but no Bluetooth or NFC.
- Sony WX80 omits GPS but includes HDMI output, useful for direct playback to TVs.
Value for Money: Price Versus Performance
At launch prices:
- Samsung DV300F around $199.99.
- Sony WX80 around $275.51.
The WX80 commands a premium for better zoom range, sensor tech, video specs, and shooting speed.
Here you can see real-world photos side by side. The Sony’s images show improved detail and color accuracy especially in shaded areas, while Samsung’s images have slightly warmer tones but less fine detail retention.
Our comprehensive scoring aligns with practical testing:
- Sony WX80 scores higher in autofocus, zoom, video, and low-light performance.
- Samsung DV300F ranks solid for ease of use and bright lens speed.
Breaking down by genres:
Genre | Samsung DV300F | Sony WX80 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Good | Very Good |
Landscape | Moderate | Good |
Wildlife | Limited | Good |
Sports | Poor | Good |
Street | Good | Very Good |
Macro | Good | Good |
Astro/Night | Poor | Moderate |
Video | Moderate | Very Good |
Travel | Good | Very Good |
Professional | Limited | Moderate |
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Style?
Samsung DV300F
Strengths:
- Bright wide aperture f/2.5 for better low light stills.
- Simple controls, making it user-friendly for beginners.
- Optical image stabilization helps handheld shots.
- Lower cost makes it an entry-level choice.
Limitations:
- CCD sensor struggles in low light, limited ISO.
- No continuous shooting or advanced autofocus.
- Video limited to 720p.
- No touchscreen or HDMI output.
Recommended for: Casual shooters and beginners prioritizing ease of use, indoor portraits, and basic travel photography on a budget.
Sony Cyber-shot WX80
Strengths:
- Versatile 8x zoom covering wide to telephoto.
- BSI-CMOS sensor gives better low-light performance.
- Touch AF and 10 fps burst shooting useful for action.
- Full HD 1080p video at 60fps with optical stabilization.
- HDMI output for easy media playback.
Limitations:
- Smaller and lower resolution screen.
- Smaller maximum aperture (f/3.3-8.0) reduces light in telephoto.
- No manual exposure modes or raw support.
Recommended for: Enthusiasts seeking a flexible compact for travel, street, and moderate wildlife/sports photography with improved image and video quality.
Why You Can Trust This Comparison
With over 15 years photographing and reviewing compact cameras, I’ve placed both models through extensive lab tests and real environments - from urban night streets to outdoor wildlife attempts. Image samples, autofocus tests, handling comfort, and video trials all contributed to this balanced analysis. While neither camera is perfect, understanding their real-world strengths helps you choose a camera fitting your goals and budget.
In the era of smartphones, dedicated compacts like the Samsung DV300F and Sony WX80 still offer advantages such as longer zoom lenses and specific photographic controls. Your final choice comes down to whether you prioritize simplicity and affordability or enhanced zoom and image quality with richer video features.
Happy shooting!
Samsung DV300F vs Sony WX80 Specifications
Samsung DV300F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung DV300F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX80 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-01-02 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-125mm (5.0x) | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.5-6.3 | f/3.3-8.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.10 m | 4.20 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 133 grams (0.29 lb) | 124 grams (0.27 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP88 | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $200 | $276 |