Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
![Samsung EX2F front Samsung EX2F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-EX2F/Samsung-EX2F-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III/Sony-RX10-III-front.jpg)
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Launched March 2016
- Superseded the Sony RX10 II
- Later Model is Sony RX10 IV
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Samsung EX2F versus Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Samsung and Sony. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX2F (12MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the EX2F (1/1.7") and RX10 III (1") posses totally different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX2F was brought out 4 years earlier than the RX10 III and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the EX2F scores against the RX10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung EX2F & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are viewable at Samsung EX2F Gallery & Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Sony RX10 III
EX2F | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Samsung EX2F
RX10 III | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2016 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 39 months |
Screen resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 0k | Sharper screen (+1229k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung EX2F and Sony RX10 III
EX2F | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurement |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung EX2F has exterior dimensions of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs) whilst the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Look at the Samsung EX2F versus Sony RX10 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the EX2F versus the RX10 III.
![Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III size comparison Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-EX2F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX2F and RX10 III is 90 and 53 respectively.
![Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-EX2F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX2F and RX10 III.
Clearly, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX2F featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh trickier and the Sony RX10 III will result in extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX2F will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
![Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-EX2F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-EX2F-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-RX10-III-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Samsung EX2F vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Samsung EX2F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung EX2F | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2012-12-18 | 2016-03-29 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/1.7" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 7.44 x 5.58mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 41.5mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-80mm (3.3x) | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/1.4-2.7 | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Crop factor | 4.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 0 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | AMOLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) | 1051 gr (2.32 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 48 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 20.0 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 209 | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-10A | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $478 | $1,398 |