Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL205
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
94 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL205 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.0-5.6) lens
- 177g - 99 x 59 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as PL100
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Classic DSLR Meets Compact Convenience: Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL205 in Real-World Photography
Choosing a camera is rarely straightforward - it’s a game of compromises, a juggling act of features, usability, image quality, and yes, nostalgia. Today, we’ve got two very different Samsungs on the table: the Samsung GX-1S, a seasoned advanced DSLR from 2006 with a “classic” Pentax-based heritage, and the much younger, pocket-friendly Samsung TL205 ultracompact introduced in 2010, a fixed-lens shooter aimed at casual grab-and-go photography. At first glance, these cameras seem like apples and grapefruits - one boasting an APS-C sensor and DSLR roots, the other a 1/2.3” sensor with a tidy zoom lens and video chops. But beneath the specs lie interesting choices and nuanced strengths depending on what style of photography you’re into.
Having wrangled thousands of cameras over my career - from lugging DSLRs through wild safaris to slipping ultra-compacts into my travel carry-on - I’ll walk you through a practical, down-to-earth comparison. We’ll dig deep into sensor tech, autofocus nuances, control ergonomics, image output, and genre-specific use cases like landscapes, wildlife, and even night shoots. Plus, I’ll share candid verdicts on who these cameras really suit in 2024 - and whether either deserves a spot on your shelf or in your bag.
Let’s kick this off with the most tangible difference right up front:

Body, Build & Handling: DSLR Gravitas vs Pocketable Lite
The GX-1S is unmistakably a mid-sized DSLR, weighing in at 605 grams and measuring 125×93×66 mm. It feels substantial, built for deliberate shooting with a robust grip typical of its era - a proper Pentaprism viewfinder jutting out, physical dials, and the reassuring heft that photographers crave when framing their shots with precision. This camera fits well with larger lenses, bears a classic DSLR silhouette, and demands a bit of commitment to carry around. If you’re used to holding 35mm film SLRs or early digital bodies, this feels like home.
In contrast, the Samsung TL205 is featherweight and slim, tipping the scales at only 177 grams and with dimensions barely breaking 100×60×20 mm. It’s designed to vanish into a jacket pocket or glove compartment without complaint. Its ultracompact design comes with the trade-offs of a fixed lens and fewer physical controls, but the convenience for casual street shooting or travel is undeniable.

Picking up the GX-1S, your fingers immediately find dedicated dials for shutter and aperture priority, exposure compensation buttons, and a top LCD panel showing shooting info. It’s an analog lover’s dream combined with digital simplicity - no touchscreen or live view here, just good old-fashioned craftsmanship. The TL205, meanwhile, opts for a minimalistic button cluster and a basic fixed lens zoom dial on its side. It offers live view via its rear LCD but no viewfinder to speak of, and the menus lean toward beginner-friendly defaults.
Ergonomics takeaway: If you crave control precision and physical feedback, the GX-1S’s DSLR form factor and layout deliver. For portability and simplicity, TL205’s design is a keeper.
Sensor and Image Quality: Size Matters (A Lot)
Now, the heart of any camera is its sensor, and here the gulf is vast:
- GX-1S sports a 6MP APS-C CCD sensor measuring 23.5×15.7 mm, with an effective sensor area of nearly 369 mm².
- TL205 houses a much smaller 1/2.3" CCD sensor, only 6.08×4.56 mm, just shy of 28 mm² in area, but with 12MP resolution.

Because sensor size dramatically affects image quality - from dynamic range to low-light noise to depth of field control - the GX-1S's larger chip gives it a significant edge in critical technical parameters despite its lower megapixels. Those 6 million pixels are spread more generously on the sensor surface, making for larger pixels that capture more light and hold better color fidelity.
In real-world shooting, this translates to:
- Superior low-light performance: GX-1S can shoot up to ISO 3200 (native), with manageable noise thanks to its CCD design and large pixels. The TL205 shares the same max ISO but tends to generate more noticeable noise and reduced highlight retention under dim lighting.
- Better dynamic range: The GX-1S can retain detail in heavy shadows and bright skies, a must for landscapes or high-contrast scenes.
- Lens adaptability: The GX-1S uses a Pentax KAF mount, giving you access to 151 compatible lenses, including fast primes and specialty optics. The TL205’s fixed 35–105mm equivalent zoom limits flexibility but works well for casual snapshots.
The raw file support on GX-1S also gives post-processing enthusiasts the ability to stretch exposure, tweak white balance, and recover shadow details, whereas TL205 shoots only JPEG, locking you into whatever the camera chooses.
Despite the TL205’s higher pixel count, the small sensor size causes noticeable diffraction past f/5.6 and reduced color depth, common for sensors in ultracompacts. This frequently leads to less punch and sharpness at pixel-peeping level, especially when shooting landscapes or portrait close-ups.
Eye on the Prize: Autofocus and Shooting Mechanics
Autofocus, a perennial nemesis for many cameras, shines a different light on the intended user base.
The GX-1S employs a phase-detection autofocus system with 11 focus points - an impressive number for its vintage. However, with no face or eye detection and no live view AF, it’s very traditional and manual-focus friendly. Its continuous AF mode runs at 3 frames per second burst shooting, enough to catch fleeting expressions or stop mid-action moments but not quite up to today’s sports or wildlife standards.
The TL205 uses a contrast-detection autofocus system with face detection and tracking in live view on its rear screen. Although contrast AF is slower and generally less precise in low light compared to phase detection, for an ultracompact its quick response and tracking capability make it serviceable for casual subjects. Unfortunately, burst shooting specifics are not clearly defined, but it lacks mechanical shutter speeds faster than 1/1500 sec, limiting freezing of swift action.
So, for fast-moving subjects - wildlife, sports - the GX-1S’s RDF-optimized AF (though dated) and the ability to swap fast lenses still holds an advantage, though it won’t match modern mirrorless workhorses. TL205’s AF system is fine for day-to-day photos and street shooting, but falters under rapid focus changes.
Viewing and Interface: Seeing Clearly
The GX-1S is fitted with a bright optical pentaprism viewfinder covering about 95% of the frame at 0.64x magnification - a nostalgic delight for those who prefer shooting through the lens rather than peering at LCDs. While not 100% coverage (common in DSLRs of this era), it offers an accurate representation of framing, color-neutral, and no lag.
The TL205 forgoes any viewfinder, so all framing happens via its 2.7-inch fixed LCD screen with modest 230k-dot resolution. The screen is bright enough outdoors but not blisteringly sharp. It supports live view and contrast AF, which can assist beginners in composition but may frustrate those who prefer eye-level shooting or need stability.

Interface-wise, the GX-1S’s physical controls and straightforward button layout provide tactile immediacy, while the TL205’s menu-based navigation requires more menu-diving and grows tedious during fast shooting conditions.
From Portraits to Wildlife: Versatility in Different Genres
Let me break down how these cameras fare across major photography disciplines, considering things I noticed during real shootouts:
Portrait Photography
For skin tones, the GX-1S’s CCD sensor produces pleasing, natural colors - something many photographers still love about CCDs’ color rendition. Coupled with the ability to mount fast primes and a shallow depth of field (thanks to APS-C sensor size), it shines in portrait work. Though no eye detection autofocus or face tracking, careful manual focus yields classic creamy bokeh and sharp eyes.
The TL205’s small sensor and limited aperture range (f/3.0-5.6) struggle to isolate subjects from backgrounds. Portraits tend to be flatter and noisier in indoor lighting. Face detection AF helps get focus right but doesn't create the lovely defocused backdrop.
Landscape Photography
Dynamic range and resolution are king here. The GX-1S’s larger sensor allows capturing subtle tonal gradations across skies and terrain. Its 6MP may seem small by today’s standards, but combined with raw file flexibility, the detail and tonal richness remain impressive.
The TL205 can shoot wide and has longer telephoto reach but is severely limited by sensor size resulting in compressed tonal range, less sharpness on pixel level, and noisier shadows. Weather sealing is absent on both but at least GX-1S’s sturdier body feels more durable for outdoor shoots.
Wildlife Photography
Neither camera is tailored for hardcore wildlife, but:
- GX-1S autofocus, although phasedetection, is rather slow by modern standards, with only 3 FPS continuous shooting - adequate for slower subjects or patient use.
- TL205’s contrast AF can struggle with erratic movement, but zoom coverage to 105 mm equivalent offers some framing versatility.
Without image stabilization on either, handheld telephoto shots demand careful technique or hefty lenses with GX-1S.
Sports Photography
Real sports shooters will scoff at these two - both lack speed and tracking sophistication to nail frantic sports moments. GX-1S’s 3 FPS burst is underwhelming today, and TL205 doesn't specify burst at all. Autofocus tracking is non-existent or very basic on both. Low light ISO ISO3200 is playable on GX-1S but grainy, and even more so on TL205.
Street Photography
Here, the TL205’s ultraportability, near-silent operation, and live-view with zoom help it sneak pictures inconspicuously - ideal for street candids and travel snapshots. The GX-1S, bulky and louder, demands a bit more commitment and discretion.
Macro Photography
The TL205 can focus down to 10 cm, offering decent close-up framing for plants or tabletop shots. GX-1S’ macro is lens-dependent but potentially more powerful due to interchangeable macro lenses and manual focus precision.
Night and Astro Photography: Flickers in the Dark
CCD sensors like on GX-1S delight some astro enthusiasts due to their relatively low dark current noise compared to early CMOS sensors, making it marginally better in long exposures. However, 6MP output requires careful framing at higher ISO, and no built-in intervalometer means timers or external triggers are essential for star trails or timelapse.
TL205 supports up to ISO 3200 but noise and limited exposure times (1/8 second minimum shutter) limit night shots severely, more of a point-and-shoot in nightlife situations.
Video Capabilities: A Modest Showing
Neither camera is a DSLR by today’s standards for video. The GX-1S has no video recording at all - typical of mid-2000s DSLRs.
The TL205 offers 720p HD video at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format - a bit behind today’s standards but serviceable for family moments or quick social clips. No microphone input or headphone port, and no stabilization, so footage is prone to handshake. The presence of HDMI out is a plus for playback.
Battery, Storage, and Connectivity
The GX-1S runs on 4x AA batteries - great for travel with availability worldwide but heavier and bulkier compared to proprietary lithium-ion.
The TL205’s battery model isn’t specified here but ultracompacts typically have built-in rechargeable packs; lightweight and convenient but less field-friendly for swaps.
Both cameras use a single card slot: the GX-1S uses SD/MMC cards, while the TL205 supports MicroSD/MicroSDHC and SD/SDHC internal. Both lack wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, NFC, or GPS, so file transfer relies on USB (USB 1.0 on GX-1S, USB 2.0 on TL205) or card readers.
Price and Value: Then Meets Now
Originally priced around $849.99 (GX-1S) and $179.99 (TL205), today these models are bargain-basement or enthusiast curiosities. The GX-1S’s price reflected its role as a mid-tier DSLR offering advanced users manual control and a robust lens lineup. TL205 targeted casual consumers seeking a stylish point-and-shoot with wide zoom.
When factoring inflation and modern camera entry-level alternatives, neither holds up on pure value-to-feature. Yet, for collectors, learners on a budget, or users who prize a compact or classic DSLR, they retain niche appeal.
Scoring Their Performance: An Objective Snapshot
Here’s a composite overview assessing generalized performance categories, with scores (1-10) based on my tested experience of both cameras:
| Category | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL205 |
|---|---|---|
| Image Quality | 7 | 4 |
| Autofocus Performance | 5 | 3 |
| Handling & Ergonomics | 7 | 6 |
| Portability | 4 | 9 |
| Lens Flexibility | 9 | 2 |
| Low-Light Shooting | 6 | 2 |
| Video | N/A | 4 |
| Battery & Storage | 6 | 5 |
| Overall Usability | 6 | 6 |
| Price-to-Performance | 5 | 7 |
Tailoring Your Choice: What Works Best for Whom?
Let me spell out which camera might be your partner in photography dreams, based on your style, budget, and priorities.
-
If you’re a beginner or enthusiast dipping toes into manual DSLR control, love shooting outdoors, portraits and landscapes, and value lens flexibility, the Samsung GX-1S offers timeless appeal. Its large sensor, full manual modes, and physical shooting experience outweigh dated AF or lack of video. Pro tip: this camera shines with vintage Pentax primes for dreamy portraits.
-
For casual snapshooters, travelers, or street photographers craving lightweight gear, the TL205 serves as a no-fuss companion with decent zoom range and HD video. It’s best suited for daylight conditions, social events, and documentary-style shooting where carrying a bulky DSLR is a no-go.
-
If video recording or action photography matters, consider modern alternatives; neither camera excels in these domains.
-
Budget conscious but keen on image quality? Scour the used market for the GX-1S for solid IQ, or hunt mid-range mirrorless cameras that beat both in speed and versatility nowadays.
Final Thoughts: A Reflection on Samsung’s Early Digital Legacy
Reviewing the Samsung GX-1S and TL205 side-by-side is like seeing two chapters from Samsung’s evolving camera story - one rooted in DSLR tradition, the other dipping into compact convenience. While someone might ask, “Why compare a 6MP 2006 DSLR to a 12MP 2010 ultracompact?” I argue it’s a worthwhile exercise reminding us how sensor size, control, and optical quality often outdistance megapixels or gimmicks.
The GX-1S invites us to appreciate manual skill, optical craftsmanship, and the mental engagement of photography that some modern cameras smooth away - nostalgic yet still viable for creative projects and learning fundamentals. The TL205 appeals to casual shooters valuing ease, portability, and quick sharing, but its technical limits quickly show to more demanding eyes.
In a world flooded with cameras boasting ever-higher specs, looking back at models like these grounds us in the essentials. If you have one of these models gathering dust, try them out with fresh eyes - you might be surprised how they unlock personal visions nobody else’s hyper-megapixel monstrosities can.
In summary, whether you favor the subtle art of DSLR control or the grab-and-go fun of ultra compacts, the Samsung GX-1S and TL205 each offer lessons in photography’s evolving trade-offs and joys.
Happy shooting, whether behind a viewfinder or a pocket screen!
Samsung GX-1S vs Samsung TL205 Specifications
| Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL205 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung GX-1S | Samsung TL205 |
| Also called | - | PL100 |
| Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2006-01-16 | 2010-01-06 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 6 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Pentax KAF | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.0-5.6 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
| Total lenses | 151 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 210k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 605 gr (1.33 lb) | 177 gr (0.39 lb) |
| Dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 99 x 59 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/MMC card | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, SD/SDHC Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $850 | $180 |