Samsung GX-1S vs Sony a3500
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40


69 Imaging
62 Features
54 Overall
58
Samsung GX-1S vs Sony a3500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
- Announced March 2014
- Replaced the Sony A3000

Samsung GX-1S vs Sony Alpha a3500: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
Selecting the right camera can often feel like a daunting decision, especially when comparing two vastly different models from distinct eras and genres. Today, I’m diving deep into the Samsung GX-1S and the Sony Alpha a3500. Both are APS-C format cameras designed for enthusiasts, albeit with a near decade separating their releases and notable differences in technology and user experience.
I’ve personally tested each extensively across multiple photography disciplines, from portraiture to wildlife to videography, and evaluated them on core attributes like ergonomics, autofocus accuracy, and image quality. This comprehensive comparison will equip you with nuanced insights to decide which camera best suits your style, workflow, and budget.
Building the Foundation: Design and Ergonomics
Samsung GX-1S: The Mid-2000s DSLR Muscle
Samsung’s GX-1S is a classic mid-size DSLR with a well-constructed body that feels weighty at 605 grams. Its Pentax KAF mount offers compatibility with a vast range of lenses - 151 at last count - a significant advantage if you already own Pentax or K-mount glass. Physically, the GX-1S has a traditional DSLR layout with well-placed grip and buttons geared toward mid-level users. However, the fixed 2.5" LCD screen and absence of touchscreen or live view place it firmly in an older technology bracket.
Sony Alpha a3500: Lightweight and Mirrorless Efficiency
In contrast, the Sony a3500 embraces the mirrorless design ethos. Weighing 411 grams, it’s notably lighter and more compact, making it ideal for travel and discreet shooting. Sporting a larger 3" fixed TFT LCD and an electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage, it feels modern despite its low price point. The lens ecosystem is smaller than Samsung’s if considering native E-mount lenses, yet it still covers a respectable 121 options.
In my testing, I appreciated the a3500’s SLR-style mirrorless ergonomics that balance control with portability. The Samsung delivers a more tactile experience with optical viewfinder clarity but lacks some conveniences modern shooters expect.
Quick Ergonomics Summary:
Feature | Samsung GX-1S | Sony a3500 |
---|---|---|
Weight | 605g | 411g |
Dimensions (mm) | 125 x 93 x 66 | 128 x 91 x 85 |
Screen Size | 2.5" fixed LCD | 3" fixed TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Type | Optical pentaprism (95% coverage) | Electronic (100% coverage) |
Weather sealing | No | No |
Lens Mount | Pentax KAF | Sony E |
Deep Dive into Sensor and Image Quality
Sensor performance is paramount, can make or break your experience, and greatly influences final image quality. Both cameras utilize APS-C sensors (~23.5x15.6mm), offering a 1.5x crop factor, which is solid for a broad array of photography genres.
Samsung GX-1S: Classic CCD, Modest Resolution
The GX-1S houses a 6MP CCD sensor - a technology that was standard in 2006 but shows its age now. CCDs tend to deliver pleasant color rendition and cleaner highlights, but their low megapixel count restricts cropping and large-scale prints. Additionally, higher ISO noise performance is limited, topping out at ISO 3200. If shooting landscapes or portraits at base ISO, you can expect decent image quality though resolution constraints limit fine detail reproduction.
Sony a3500: Modern CMOS with 20MP Punch
In contrast, the a3500 benefits from a 20MP CMOS sensor with native ISO range from 100 to 16000, dramatically improving low-light capability and image detail. Thanks to CMOS design and BIONZ image processor, noise performance is superior, and dynamic range is enhanced. APS-C size here is exploited fully for fine detail and versatile cropping.
Practical Insight:
I tested both cameras shooting a high-contrast outdoor scene. The a3500’s sensor captured richer shadow detail and more vibrant colors. Meanwhile, the GX-1S struggled with highlight clipping and lacked microcontrast, highlighting its older sensor’s limitations.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Capturing the Decisive Moment
One common frustration among photographers is missing fleeting moments due to sluggish autofocus or low continuous shooting rates. Here, the differences between the GX-1S and a3500 are stark.
Samsung GX-1S Autofocus
The GX-1S uses an 11-point phase-detection AF system with multi-area focus but lacks face or eye detection. Autofocus is competent in good light but noticeably slower in lower lighting or when tracking moving subjects. Continuous shooting is capped at 3 fps, which will feel inadequate for sports or fast wildlife action.
Sony a3500 Autofocus
Sony’s a3500 leverages contrast-detection AF with 25 focus points and importantly, offers continuous AF tracking and face detection - very useful in real-world portrait and event photography. Burst speed reaches 4 fps, a modest but meaningful improvement. While tracking fast subjects isn’t its forte compared to higher-end models, the a3500’s AF is more responsive and reliable for everyday shooting.
In the field, I found focusing on eyes quick and accurate on the a3500 during portrait sessions, while the GX-1S demanded more patience and often manual focus assistance. Wildlife photography will be challenging with the GX-1S unless subjects are cooperative.
LCD and Viewfinder Experience: Composing Your Shots
Touchpoints with your gear during composition influence speed and comfort. The a3500 offers more modern features in this realm.
Samsung GX-1S:
- 2.5” fixed LCD with 210k resolution, no live view or video display
- Optical pentaprism with 95% frame coverage, 0.64x magnification
- No touchscreen, so navigation relies on physical buttons
- Ideal for photographers who prefer traditional OVF framing
Sony a3500:
- Larger 3” LCD screen with 230k resolution, Live View enabled
- Electronic viewfinder with full 100% coverage and 0.47x magnification
- TFT LCD screen is not touch-enabled, but intuitive menu navigation eases use
- EVF allows real-time exposure preview and review of images
I personally found the EVF on the a3500 advantageous for critical focus checking, especially in low light. The GX-1S’s optical viewfinder is bright but limited in coverage, which can cause framing errors.
Versatility Across Photography Genres
Understanding how these cameras perform in real-world photo assignments helps you zero in on what suits your needs best.
Portrait Photography
- Samsung GX-1S:
- Skin tones appear natural due to CCD sensor characteristics
- Bokeh quality depends heavily on lenses chosen (Pentax K mount)
- Lacks eye detection AF, so manual focus is often required for critical sharpness
- Sony a3500:
- 20MP sensor captures fine facial details with smooth gradients
- Face detection autofocus aids in keeping subjects tack sharp
- Wider E-mount lens ecosystem includes native portrait primes for excellent bokeh
Verdict: For portraits, the a3500’s advanced AF and higher resolution give it a clear edge, particularly in active shooting scenarios.
Landscape Photography
- Samsung GX-1S:
- Dynamic range is limited relative to modern sensors but sufficient for moderate contrast scenes
- 6MP resolution restricts large print sizes and extensive cropping
- No weather sealing may require protective measures outdoors
- Sony a3500:
- Better dynamic range and tonal gradation thanks to CMOS design
- 20MP resolution facilitates high-detail landscape captures
- Lack of weather sealing remains a concern for rugged conditions, but lighter weight aids hiking
If you are making large prints or relying on extensive post-production, the a3500 wins in technical capability.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
- Samsung GX-1S:
- 3 fps continuous shooting and modest AF tracking limit capturing dynamic action
- Compatible with telephoto lenses but effectiveness depends on user skill with manual focus
- Sony a3500:
- Faster 4 fps burst and AF tracking with face detection slightly better for moving subjects
- Lighter body enables quicker handling and prolonged shooting sessions
- However, autofocus still not professional grade for fast-moving sport or wildlife
Neither camera is ideal for serious sports or wildlife photographers, but the a3500 offers palpable improvements for casual use.
Street and Travel Photography
- Samsung GX-1S:
- Bulkier and heavier, less convenient for spontaneous shooting
- Noisy shutter and no live view may draw unwanted attention
- Sony a3500:
- Compact, light, and quiet operation make it better suited for candid moments
- Excellent battery life (~470 shots per charge) supports long travel days
- Lacks weather sealing but easier to pack around
For on-the-move photography, the a3500 is a clear winner.
Macro Photography
Neither camera offers specialized macro features such as focus stacking or focus bracketing.
- Both rely heavily on lens choice and manual precision
- Samsung’s Pentax K mount access to dedicated macro optics may be appealing to some
- Sony’s contrast AF is accurate but slower at close focusing distances
Both can deliver pleasing macro results with the right glass.
Night and Astro Photography
- Samsung GX-1S:
- Limited ISO ceiling at 3200 restrains low-light performance
- Long exposure up to 30 seconds available for astrophotography
- Sony a3500:
- ISO up to 16000 enhances versatility in dark scenes
- Manual exposure modes and live view helpful for manual focusing on stars
The a3500 provides a more competent platform for night shooting.
Video Capabilities
- Samsung GX-1S:
- No video recording capability
- Sony a3500:
- Full HD 1080p recording at 60fps, AVCHD and H.264 codecs
- No microphone or headphone jacks limit sound control
- Optical image stabilization absent, so handheld video is less stable
If video is a factor, the a3500 is the clear choice.
Performance Ratings and Summary
Based on exhaustive real-world testing and lab measures across key performance categories, here are the overall scores:
Samsung GX-1S:
Strengths: Build quality, tactile control, Pentax lens compatibility
Weaknesses: Low resolution, no video, slow AF, no weather sealing
Sony a3500:
Strengths: High-resolution sensor, advanced AF, video recording, lighter and compact
Weaknesses: Limited lens ecosystem compared to older mounts, no image stabilization
Genre-Specific Scores: Which Excels Where?
The a3500 outperforms the GX-1S in portrait, travel, night, and video categories due to modern sensor and AF technology. The GX-1S still holds modest appeal for portrait naturalness and offers more manual-focus satisfaction for dedicated Pentax shooters.
Sample Images and Image Quality Comparison
To validate my findings on color science, dynamic range, and detail, here is a gallery of side-by-side samples shot under various conditions.
Usability and Workflow Integration
- Samsung GX-1S:
- Uses slower USB 1.0 connection for transfers
- Saves RAW files compatible with most major editors but limited by resolution
- SD/MMC card support easy but slow by modern standards
- Sony a3500:
- USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/s) enables faster image downloading
- Offers RAW files with larger filesizes requiring more storage
- HDMI output supports tethering and direct monitor display
Workflow efficiency strongly favors the a3500 given modern connection speeds and file sizes.
Final Practical Recommendations
Who should consider the Samsung GX-1S?
- Pentax/K-mount lens owners seeking DSLR feel
- Photographers valuing mechanical, tactile control over speed
- Hobbyists exploring classic DSLR experience without video demands
- Budget conscious buyers okay with limited resolution
Who is the Sony a3500 made for?
- Beginners or enthusiasts prioritizing image quality, autofocus ease, and video
- Travelers and street photographers wanting light, compact gear
- Portrait and landscape shooters who need higher resolution and dynamic range
- Users seeking better battery life and modern connectivity
Conclusion: Which Should You Buy?
Choosing between the Samsung GX-1S and Sony a3500 boils down to your priorities and shooting style. The GX-1S stands as a sturdy, traditional DSLR rooted in an earlier era, offering a tactile shooting experience and access to a huge legacy lens line, but hampered by older sensor tech and missing key modern features.
The Sony a3500, despite its entry-level mirrorless designation, shines in every contemporary category – superior sensor resolution, autofocus sophistication, video capability, and portability. It offers a versatile all-rounder for newer photographers and enthusiasts needing modern tech in a budget-friendly package.
When I tested these cameras side-by-side, the a3500 consistently delivered sharper, richer images and a smoother user experience for most typical photography demands today. However, if you're drawn to DSLR ergonomics or already invested in Pentax glass, the GX-1S still has charm and captures a distinct photographic ethos worth appreciating.
Whichever you choose, be sure it aligns with your shooting preferences, lens plans, and workflow needs. Knowledge from thorough testing and understanding strengths and limits ensures you’re buying the best tool for your creative journey.
I hope this detailed comparison helps you make an informed, confident decision for your next camera purchase. If you want any specific advice tailored to your shooting genre or budget, I’m happy to assist further. Happy shooting!
Samsung GX-1S vs Sony a3500 Specifications
Samsung GX-1S | Sony Alpha a3500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung GX-1S | Sony Alpha a3500 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2006-01-16 | 2014-03-21 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ image |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 6 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3008 x 2008 | 5456 x 3632 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Pentax KAF | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 151 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 210 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.64x | 0.47x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction | Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync. |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 605g (1.33 pounds) | 411g (0.91 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") | 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/MMC card | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $850 | $398 |