Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
![Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-Galaxy-Camera-3G/Samsung-Galaxy-Camera-3G-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL202 front Samsung SL202 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL202/Samsung-SL202-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Samsung SL202, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Samsung. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The Galaxy Camera 3G was unveiled 3 years after the SL202 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up versus the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are available at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Samsung SL202
Galaxy Camera 3G | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | February 2009 | Newer by 43 months |
Screen dimension | 4.8" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+2.1") |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
SL202 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Samsung SL202
Galaxy Camera 3G | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has got external dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Samsung SL202 has sizing of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G compared to the SL202.
![Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 size comparison Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Camera-3G-vs-Samsung-SL202-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the Galaxy Camera 3G and SL202 is 90 and 94 respectively.
![Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Camera-3G-vs-Samsung-SL202-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 3G and SL202.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G to produce extra detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent Galaxy Camera 3G should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Camera-3G-vs-Samsung-SL202-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
![Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Samsung-Galaxy-Camera-3G-vs-Samsung-SL202-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Samsung |
Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Samsung SL202 |
Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | - | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 4.8" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 0 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 8 seconds |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.60 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305 grams (0.67 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $606 | $140 |