Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 404g - 120 x 67 x 49mm
- Launched February 2016
- Previous Model is Sony A6000
- Later Model is Sony A6500
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Overview
The following is a extensive analysis of the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony A6300, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Samsung and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) and A6300 (24MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (1/2.3") and A6300 (APS-C) feature different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Galaxy Camera 3G was unveiled 4 years earlier than the A6300 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G being a Compact camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the Galaxy Camera 3G matches up against the A6300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony Alpha a6300. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery and Sony A6300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Sony A6300
Galaxy Camera 3G | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A6300 over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
A6300 | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2016 | August 2012 | Newer by 41 months | |
Manually focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 922k | 0k | Sharper display (+922k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G and Sony A6300
Galaxy Camera 3G | A6300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G features physical dimensions of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") with a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs) while the Sony A6300 has measurements of 120mm x 67mm x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 404 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G versus Sony A6300 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the Galaxy Camera 3G against the A6300.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Galaxy Camera 3G and A6300 is 90 and 83 respectively.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the Galaxy Camera 3G and A6300.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The Galaxy Camera 3G using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A6300 will give you greater detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged Galaxy Camera 3G is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G vs Sony A6300 Specifications
Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Alpha a6300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | Sony Alpha a6300 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-08-29 | 2016-02-03 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | 1.4GHz Quad-Core | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | - | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens zoom range | 23-481mm (20.9x) | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 4.8" | 3" |
Display resolution | 0 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | - | 30s |
Max shutter speed | - | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction, Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 4K (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (24p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 305g (0.67 lb) | 404g (0.89 lb) |
Dimensions | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") | 120 x 67 x 49mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1437 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 photographs |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $606 | $889 |