Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Released May 2009
- Additionally Known as WB500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Introduced February 2014
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Lets look more closely at the Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Samsung and Sigma. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the HZ10W (10MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the HZ10W (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) have different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe HZ10W was released 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Samsung HZ10W being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the HZ10W scores versus the DP2 Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung HZ10W and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Samsung HZ10W Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ10W over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
HZ10W | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Samsung HZ10W
DP2 Quattro | HZ10W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2014 | May 2009 | Newer by 57 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung HZ10W and Sigma DP2 Quattro
HZ10W | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Samsung HZ10W has got external measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the HZ10W and the DP2 Quattro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the HZ10W and DP2 Quattro is 90 and 70 respectively.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions only by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the HZ10W and DP2 Quattro.
As you can see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The HZ10W because of its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will give you more detail as a result of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged HZ10W is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung HZ10W vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sigma |
Model type | Samsung HZ10W | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Also called as | WB500 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-05-14 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 5424 x 3616 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 249 grams (0.55 pounds) | 395 grams (0.87 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $300 | $931 |