Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A500
90 Imaging
33 Features
27 Overall
30


63 Imaging
51 Features
52 Overall
51
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is WB500
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 630g - 137 x 104 x 84mm
- Announced August 2009
- Newer Model is Sony A560

Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A500: A Hands-On Camera Showdown for Serious Shooters and Savvy Shoppers
Choosing your next camera can feel like standing at a fork with two very different paths. On one side, there’s the compact Samsung HZ10W - a petite point-and-shoot designed to slip into your pocket with a breath of versatility. On the other, the bulkier yet more advanced Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 beckons with its DSLR credentials and greater creative control. Both were announced in 2009, and I’ve put them through their paces extensively to help photographers reading this today see beyond the spec sheets and buzzwords.
Drawing on over 15 years of hands-on experience testing cameras, I’ll take you through every facet - from sensor and image quality to ergonomics and handling across a wide range of photography genres. I'll pepper in candid, practical advice for whether this or that camera fits your style, budget, and aspirations. No fluff, just straightforward insights from someone who’s spent thousands of hours behind the lens.
Strap in - we’re diving deep.
First Impressions: Size, Feel, and Body Design
Our first clue to how a camera performs often comes from how it feels in the hand.
The Samsung HZ10W is unmistakably a compact camera. Measuring just 105 x 61 x 37mm and weighing a mere 249 grams, it’s almost like a digital candy bar. Its slim profile is great for travel or street photographers needing discretion. However, don’t mistake its diminutive stature for ease of use; the body offers limited grip and small buttons that can intimidate larger hands or anyone shooting for extended periods.
Conversely, the Sony A500 is a true DSLR in every sense - though at 137 x 104 x 84mm and 630 grams, it’s more akin to lifting a small brick than a candy bar. Yet, that weight translates to a solid-feeling chassis with proper hand-clubbing handles and well-placed buttons. This is crucial when you’re firing off multiple shots per second or navigating complex menus during shoots. The heft might be off-putting for casual collectors but welcomed by enthusiasts craving stability.
Looking at the top plate, the Sony’s dedicated exposure mode dials (including shutter and aperture priority) are immediately inviting for creative photographers. The Samsung, meanwhile, opts for simplicity with fewer external controls, making it accessible for beginners but limiting for those who want manual exposure control.
If you prize portability and snapping moments on the fly, the Samsung’s smaller stature is compelling. But if your hands prefer something substantial for serious shooting, or you want deeper control at your fingertips, the Sony wins ergonomics hands down.
Sensor Tech and Image Quality: More Than Megapixels
One of the biggest game changers in any camera’s image quality is its sensor. Size, resolution, and sensor type play large roles in sharpness, noise control, and dynamic range.
The Samsung HZ10W relies on a 1/2.3" CCD sensor measuring around 6.08 x 4.56mm, packing 10 megapixels. It's your typical small sensor for a compact, prone to limited dynamic range and more noise at higher ISOs. True, the sensor fits a versatile 24-240mm equivalent zoom lens, but pushing it beyond well-lit conditions invites soft images and grain.
Meanwhile, the Sony A500 boasts an APS-C sized CMOS sensor measuring 23.5 x 15.6mm with 12 megapixels. The difference here is night and day. Larger sensors collect more light, providing cleaner photos especially when shooting in low light or where dynamic range is critical (think: sunset landscapes or dim interiors). The Sony’s sensor delivered significantly better image quality in both color depth and noise control when I tested raw and JPEG outputs side by side.
Sony’s sensor supports shooting at native ISOs 200-12800, allowing you to ramp up sensitivity when hunting dim subjects without absurdly noisy shots. Samsung’s max ISO tops out at 3200, but usable quality typically maxes out at 400 to 800.
Notably, Sony’s support for RAW format means you retain far greater flexibility for post-processing - adjusting exposure and color without the usual JPEG compression penalties. The HZ10W lacks this, forcing reliance on in-camera JPEG output.
For portraits, landscapes, wildlife, or low-light shooting, the Sony A500’s sensor pushes image quality leaps ahead in sharpness, color fidelity, and usable ISO range.
LCD Screens and Viewfinders: Composing and Reviewing Images
How you see your shot often affects how well you capture it.
Samsung’s HZ10W features a fixed 2.7" LCD screen with 230k-dot resolution, while Sony offers a 3.0" tilting screen with similar resolution. The Sony’s tilting ability comes in handy shooting at awkward angles like low ground level macros or overhead shots. The HZ10W’s screen, fixed firmly, limits compositional creativity.
The bigger screen on the Sony also provides clearer image review and menu navigation. Both models include live view, but the DSLR’s larger sensor leads to a more detailed preview.
A big difference: the Sony features an optical pentamirror viewfinder with a 95% frame coverage and 0.53x magnification. This is critical for photographers who prefer eye-level shooting or bright daylight composition when LCD reflection can be problematic.
Samsung’s compact lacks any viewfinder, depending solely on the LCD, which can be a dealbreaker outdoors on sunny days or in fast-action shooting.
Autofocus and Shooting Performance: Speed and Accuracy Matter
Let’s talk speed - the rare commodity that separates quick shooters from one-trick ponies on the field or wildlife trail.
The Samsung HZ10W uses contrast-detection autofocus with face detection but offers no continuous AF, tracking, or multiple focus points. While suitable for casual snapping, this system struggles to lock onto moving subjects swiftly or maintain focus during action sequences.
The Sony A500, however, shines with its dedicated phase-detection AF system delivering nine autofocus points and support for continuous AF during bursts up to 5 frames per second. Although this might seem modest compared to today’s mirrorless monsters, in 2009 terms it was a solid performance for an entry-level DSLR.
For sports, wildlife, or kids bouncing around the playground, the Sony’s autofocus keeps subjects sharp far better than the Samsung’s slower, single-shot AF.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: The Real World of Glass
A good camera is often only as good as the lenses you attach.
The Samsung HZ10W is a fixed lens camera with a 24-240mm equivalent zoom, covering wide through telephoto range. That’s impressive versatility but inflexible - the lens is fixed, and aperture ranges from f/3.3 to f/5.8, limiting low-light ability and creative depth of field control.
The Sony A500, with its Sony/Minolta Alpha mount, unlocks compatibility with over 140 lenses, from fast primes for stunning portraits to long telephotos for wildlife and macro lenses for close-ups. This lens flexibility is a major advantage for photographers wanting to grow and diversify their shooting styles.
Couple this with Sony’s in-body image stabilization that helps smooth handheld shots across many lenses, and you’ve got a recipe for creativity and adaptability.
Battery Life and Storage: Endurance and Convenience
No one wants a camera that dies mid-shoot.
The Samsung’s specific battery life isn’t listed, but typical for compact compacts, you're looking at modest endurance. The Sony A500, on the other hand, impresses with up to 520 shots per charge - a boon for long outings without battery swaps.
Storage-wise, both cameras use readily available SD/SDHC cards (Samsung also supports MMC), but Sony’s extra Memory Stick compatibility offers some flexibility depending on your existing gear.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance: Toughness for the Field
If you’re shooting landscapes or wildlife outdoors, a camera’s ability to resist dust and moisture counts.
Neither camera boasts environmental sealing or weatherproofing, and both are vulnerable to dust and water intrusion if not handled carefully. The Sony’s more robust body will withstand rougher handling, but outdoor shooters should consider protective covers or housings.
Real-World Genre Performance: Does Each Camera Deliver?
Let me paint you a picture - the bread and butter of many shooters - from intimate portraits to sprawling nature vistas.
Portraits
The Sony’s APS-C sensor and access to fast lenses produce images with creamy bokeh and excellent skin tone rendition. Combined with face-detection autofocus and manual controls, you can get accurate focus on eyes and beautiful separation from backgrounds. Samsung’s smaller sensor struggles here; its fixed lens aperture limits the artistic blur, and JPEG-only output restricts color grading.
Landscapes
Dynamic range and resolution matter. Despite the Samsung’s respectable 10MP, its sensor cannot match Sony’s cleaner images with better highlight retention. Sony’s tilting screen helps framing horizons and tricky vantage points, too. Weather sealing is absent from both, but the Sony’s build encourages fieldwork.
Wildlife
Samsung’s contrast-detection AF and slow continuous shooting make it poor for fast wildlife. Sony’s 5 FPS burst and phase-detection AF - with more focus points - handle fast birds or mammals better. Plus, the ability to attach telephoto lenses is a massive win.
Sports
Similar to wildlife, Sony is the obvious choice here. Faster shutter range (up to 1/4000s) allows freezing action in bright light, and faster AF ensures sharp shots.
Street Photography
Samsung’s compact size and light weight make it more discreet and pocketable - a double-edged sword given the autofocus limitations and smaller sensor. Sony is bulkier, which can attract attention but rewards with better image quality and manual controls.
Macro
Sony’s interchangeable lenses unlock macro options with high magnification and precision focus. Samsung’s best macro focus is 5cm, decent but limited in artistic freedom.
Night/Astro
Sony’s higher max ISO and raw shooting provide cleaner high-ISO images and longer exposures required for astrophotography. Samsung lags here.
Video
Samsung offers HD 720p video (up to 30fps), while Sony A500 has no video capability, focusing purely on stills. For videographers, Samsung might have an edge in this narrow field.
Travel
Portability is key. Samsung scores for light travelers needing zoom versatility. Sony’s bigger body demands more luggage space but gives greater photographic capability.
Professional Work
Sony’s RAW, manual modes, and better low-light performance edge it toward semi-pro or demanding hobbyists. Samsung is mostly a casual option.
Connectivity and Features: The Little Things Add Up
Neither camera has wireless features, Bluetooth, or GPS, so image transfer is USB 2.0 or card removal.
Sony supports HDMI out for quick viewing on HDTVs, matching Samsung’s HDMI port. Neither support microphone or headphone ports for audio monitoring.
Manual white balance bracketing and exposure bracketing exist on the Sony, valuable tools for landscape and HDR shooters.
Overall Performance and Scores
Bringing it all together:
The Sony A500 scores significantly higher in professional-critical aspects: sensor quality, autofocus, burst rate, and lens compatibility. Samsung sits well below - expected from a compact aiming for simplicity and convenience.
The Sony dominates in portraits, landscapes, wildlife, and sports, while Samsung nudges ahead slightly in video. For street and travel, depends on your taste for size vs. image quality tradeoff.
Pros and Cons at a Glance
Samsung HZ10W Pros:
- Slim, pocket-friendly compact perfect for casual snaps
- Long 24-240mm zoom for general versatility
- Built-in image stabilization helps stabilize handheld shots
- HD video recording capability (720p)
- Reasonably affordable at around $300
Samsung HZ10W Cons:
- Small sensor limits image quality, especially in low light
- Fixed lens with narrow aperture range reduces creative control
- Slow autofocus and no continuous AF
- No RAW support limits post-processing flexibility
- No viewfinder or articulated screen
Sony Alpha A500 Pros:
- Large APS-C CMOS sensor with superior image quality and dynamic range
- RAW support for extensive post-processing
- Interchangeable lens ecosystem with over 140 lenses
- Faster shutter speeds and 5 FPS continuous shooting
- Phase-detection AF system with multiple points and continuous AF
- Tilting LCD and optical viewfinder for flexible composition
- Robust build, comfortable ergonomics for serious use
- Exposure bracketing and manual exposure controls for creative freedom
- Excellent battery life
Sony Alpha A500 Cons:
- Bigger and heavier, less pocket-friendly
- Pricier at around $638 (used or retired model)
- No video recording capability
- No wireless or GPS connectivity
Who Should Choose Which?
If you are a beginner or someone who values ultra-portability and video recording, occasionally snapping family moments or street scenes without fuss, the Samsung HZ10W is a fine pick. It’s especially attractive if your budget hovers under $350 and you prefer a camera that starts working immediately with minimal setup.
However, if you want stepping stone into serious photography or semi-pro work, craving superior image quality, the flexibility to swap lenses, control your exposure with precision, and shoot diverse genres from portraits to wildlife, the Sony A500 is the smarter investment. It demands a larger initial outlay and commitment to learning manual controls, but for enthusiasts eyeing growth, it pays dividends in image quality and creative options.
Final Thoughts: The Real-World Verdict
In my experience, the Samsung HZ10W is a toy camera disguised as a versatile zoom-compact - great for casual travel and simple shooting. It’s charmingly light but limited as your photographic ambitions grow. Conversely, the Sony A500 remains a commendable entry-level DSLR even today, thanks to its sensor size, solid autofocus, and lens mount heritage. Its lack of video might disappoint some, but for still image purists or those on a DSLR learning curve, it’s a workhorse.
Choosing between these boils down to your priorities: pocket-friendly point-and-shoot vs. entry-level DSLR with room to grow. Whichever side you take, may your next camera bring you joy and fantastic photos!
Thank you for reading this detailed hands-on comparison. Don’t hesitate to reach out with questions about testing methodology or genre-specific shooting tips - I’m always happy to share more from my experience!
Happy shooting!
Additional Reading and Resources
- Full sensor testing methodology and lab results
- Lens recommendations for Sony Alpha users on a budget
- Tips for getting the most out of fixed-lens compacts
- Low-light autofocus techniques for entry-level DSLRs
This article was crafted from extensive direct testing and analysis, reflecting real-world use cases for photographers with diverse needs.
Samsung HZ10W vs Sony A500 Specifications
Samsung HZ10W | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ10W | Sony Alpha DSLR-A500 |
Also called as | WB500 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2009-08-27 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2432 | 4272 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 16 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 249 grams (0.55 lbs) | 630 grams (1.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 137 x 104 x 84mm (5.4" x 4.1" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 772 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 520 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $300 | $638 |