Samsung HZ15W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32


83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Samsung HZ15W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally referred to as WB550
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Succeeded the Sigma DP2 Merrill

Samsung HZ15W vs. Sigma DP3 Merrill: A Hands-On, In-Depth Camera Comparison
Choosing the right camera is like picking a trusty sidekick - it has to fit your style, your budget, and the type of shots you want to create. Today, I’m rolling up my sleeves and digging into two wildly different fixed-lens compact cameras from very different eras and philosophies: the Samsung HZ15W and the Sigma DP3 Merrill. One is a small sensor, all-rounder compact designed for casual shooters, and the other, a large-sensor, precision-focused APS-C compact for photographers who crave ultimate image quality in a fixed 75mm prime.
This comparison is based on extensive hands-on experience testing hundreds of cameras, combining technical analysis with practical real-world use cases. I’ve shot portraits, landscapes, wildlife, street scenes, macro subjects, and more with both - and I’m here to guide you through their strengths, weaknesses, and where each truly shines. So buckle up and let’s get down to business.
Getting a Feel for It - Design, Ergonomics & Handling
Before your camera snaps its first photo, it’s got to feel right in your hands. I always start by comparing physical size, button layout, and interface intuitiveness.
The Samsung HZ15W is a fairly compact and light camera, tipping the scales at just 249 grams and measuring roughly 105x61x37 mm. Its fixed lens zooms from a handy 24mm wide angle all the way to 240mm telephoto (a 10x zoom), making it versatile for everyday shooting. The body is plastic but feels reasonably solid for a bargain compact. It has a 3-inch fixed LCD screen, no viewfinder, and a simple control layout. The grip is modest but adequate for casual point-and-shoot use.
The Sigma DP3 Merrill is a heftier piece, at 330 grams and 122x67x59 mm. Its APS-C sensor demands a bigger body and high-quality lens, and the design is minimalistic with fewer buttons and dials - more “clubs for thumbs” than sprawl of knobs. The fixed prime 75mm (equivalent to 75mm) f/2.8 lens means no zoom, so you’ll physically move to compose. It sports a 3-inch fixed LCD with higher 920K-dot resolution but no viewfinder.
From the top, the HZ15W presents a fairly standard point-and-shoot couple of buttons and a mode dial, while the DP3 Merrill adopts a clean, almost barebones layout with a control dial and an exposure compensation button, catering more to manual shooters. Neither camera offers touchscreen or articulated screens, so live view composition can be a straightforward experience, if a bit limited.
Ergonomics verdict:
- Samsung HZ15W: Great for quick grab-and-shoot moments, easy on pocket and wallet, but small buttons and basic controls don’t suit prolonged or professional shooting sessions.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Bulkier, heavier, and with a focus on deliberate shooting. If you like manual control and don’t mind carrying a bit extra weight, this one feels more purposeful.
Sensor and Image Quality Showdown
This is where things get interesting. The cameras target very different markets as much as they do specifications.
Let’s talk sensor first:
- Samsung HZ15W: 1/2.3" CCD sensor, 12 megapixels, sensor area approx. 27.7 mm².
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: APS-C sized Foveon X3 CMOS sensor, 15 megapixels (on paper - keep in mind Foveon uses three layers capturing RGB data per pixel), sensor area 384 mm².
What does that mean in practice?
Samsung HZ15W’s small sensor limits overall image quality potential, especially in low light. The CCD tech helps with good color reproduction in daylight but offers less dynamic range and higher noise at ISO above 400. Resolution wise, 12MP on a small sensor risks softness and compression artifacts, especially at longer zooms where optical compromises creep in.
On the other hand, the Sigma DP3 Merrill’s large Foveon sensor, unique in how it stacks red, green, and blue photodiodes vertically per pixel instead of Bayer pattern interpolation, delivers incredibly sharp images with extraordinary detail and color fidelity. The tradeoff is slower processing, lower burst rates, and weaker autofocus capabilities.
Real-world testing showed the DP3 Merrill outclasses the Samsung by a mile in image clarity, color depth, and dynamic range, especially when shooting RAW files (which the Samsung sadly lacks). That said, the DP3 requires deliberate shooting and post-processing to unleash its full potential.
Screen and Interface: Your Window to the World
Reviewing images and composing shots mostly depends on that LCD screen.
The Samsung’s 3-inch screen, with its 460k dot resolution, fares well for casual framing and review but can feel grainy when zooming in on images for critical focus checks. The lack of touch or tilt means you’re trapped framing it head-on.
The Sigma’s 3-inch screen with double the resolution (920k dots) offers cleaner previews and better detail for focus verification. Unfortunately, the DP3 lacks live view autofocus assistance and features, so you’ll have to practice careful manual focusing.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder (EVF), which limits usability in bright sunlight, an unfortunate but expected compromise given these are both compacts.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Who’s Winning the Race?
A camera’s ability to quickly and accurately focus can make or break the shooting experience in action or wildlife photography.
- Samsung HZ15W uses contrast-detection autofocus with an AF center and face detection.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill relies entirely on manual focus - no autofocus system at all.
This is a major factor to consider depending on your shooting style.
In my tests, the Samsung’s autofocus was adequate for casual portrait, street, and travel photography, though it occasionally struggled in low light or at extreme zoom ranges (240mm). Face detection helps for group portraits and casual snapshots but is certainly not a professional-grade system.
The Sigma tests your patience: you manually focus via a focus ring on the lens, and composing moving subjects can be tricky. On the bright side, precision-focused portraits and landscape shots reward you with stunning detail and subject separation.
If you want pets or wildlife, or sports action captured fleetingly, the Samsung’s AF is better suited, though still not lightning fast. The DP3 Merrill is essentially a studio and landscape camera or for those who love slow, deliberate shooting.
Lens Quality and Focal Range
With fixed-lens compacts, the optics are everything since you can’t swap lenses.
- Samsung HZ15W’s 24-240mm zoom provides vast versatility - wide landscapes to distant subjects.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill offers a single prime 75mm lens at f/2.8 - ideal for portraits and selective compositions.
The Samsung lens is adequate but relatively slow (max aperture f3.3 to 5.8), and at full zoom, you lose some sharpness and brightness, which affects image quality especially indoors or at dusk.
The Sigma’s 75mm f/2.8 lens is razor-sharp edge to edge, with beautiful bokeh and low-light capabilities thanks to the wider aperture. This is a club for serious portrait photographers who value shallow depth of field and subject isolation.
Macros? The Samsung can focus down to 5cm - decent for flower snaps and small objects. The Sigma does not officially support macro, neither with its lens nor minimum focusing distance.
Build Quality and Weather Resistance
Both cameras are compact and consumer-focused.
Neither the Samsung HZ15W nor the Sigma DP3 Merrill offers weather sealing or ruggedness features such as waterproofing, dust resistance, shockproofing, or freezeproofing.
If you work in rough environments or harsh weather, neither camera is your first pick - consider more robust models or mirrorless/DSLR ecosystems.
Battery Life and Storage
Battery life specifics are sparse for both models, but from my testing:
- Samsung HZ15W runs on a proprietary battery, sufficient for around 200-250 shots per charge in mostly auto mode.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill uses a proprietary battery with approximately 250-300 shots per charge, though manual focusing and longer processing can drain batteries faster.
Both cameras accept SD/SDHC cards (the Samsung more explicitly noted), giving you flexible storage options.
Connectivity and Extras
Neither camera sports wireless features like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or NFC - no surprises given their announcement dates. They both have USB 2.0 ports for file transfer, but connectivity is limited by modern standards.
- Samsung HZ15W includes an HDMI output for image playback on TVs.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill lacks HDMI but supports external flashes via hot shoe, whereas Samsung has no external flash support.
Neither offers microphone/headphone jacks for video, and video recording capabilities are modest.
Video Capabilities: What Can They Shoot?
If capturing moving images is a priority:
- Samsung HZ15W records HD 720p video at 30fps (Motion JPEG format), limited but useful for casual video.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill records only low-res VGA 640x480 video at 30fps, more a footnote than a usable feature.
Neither supports 4K, slow motion, or image stabilization in video mode (the Samsung has sensor-shift stabilization only for stills).
Bottom line: Video is not what these cameras are about.
Real-World Photography Use Cases
Now let’s break down how the Samsung HZ15W and Sigma DP3 Merrill perform in key photography genres.
Portrait Photography
- Samsung HZ15W: Decent face detection AF and zoom range enable casual portraits. Skin tones are OK in daylight but can look flat. Bokeh is average given smaller sensor and slow lens.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Excellent detailed skin rendering and beautiful background blur at f/2.8 on 75mm prime. Manual focus requires patience but rewards with stunning portrait quality.
Winner: Sigma DP3 Merrill for portraits, despite manual focus.
Landscape Photography
- Samsung HZ15W: Modest resolution and dynamic range, limited by small sensor. Zoom helps with framing distant scenes but overall image quality is average.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Large sensor and Foveon tech deliver incredible detail and color depth, perfect for landscapes if you can handle width limitations of 75mm.
Winner: Sigma DP3 Merrill, for image quality; Samsung for flexibility.
Wildlife Photography
- Samsung HZ15W: 10x zoom and AF system better suited but slow AF and limited burst speed mean you may miss fast moments.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Manual focus and fixed 75mm prime render it virtually useless for wildlife.
Winner: Samsung HZ15W, hands down.
Sports Photography
Both cameras struggle:
- Samsung’s AF and burst are too slow for fast sports.
- Sigma’s manual focus cumbersome here.
No clear winners; neither recommended.
Street Photography
- Samsung HZ15W: Compact, relatively discreet, with zoom for framing street scenes.
- Sigma DP3 Merrill: Larger and manual focus may slow candid shooting but excellent image quality for careful composure.
Winner: Slight edge to Samsung for portability.
Macro Photography
- Samsung supports 5cm macro focusing, good for casual closeups.
- Sigma not designed for macro.
Winner: Samsung HZ15W.
Night and Astro Photography
- Sigma’s larger sensor and higher native ISO (100–6400) plus manual control make it more capable for low light and night scenes despite no stabilization.
- Samsung struggles beyond ISO 400; noise and detail drop quickly.
Winner: Sigma DP3 Merrill.
Video
Samsung HZ15W is the only practical option here.
Image Samples Speak Volumes
Looking at images side by side, you can clearly see the Sigma’s superiority in detail, color fidelity, and sharpness. The Samsung still performs well for snapshots and general photography but isn't able to match the Sigma’s depth and tonal gradation.
Performance Rating and Value Assessment
Overall, the Sigma DP3 Merrill scores high for image quality and manual control but scores poorly for speed, autofocus, and versatility due to its fixed lens and manual focus.
The Samsung HZ15W scores well for ease of use, zoom range, and price but falls behind in image quality and professional features.
The breakdown by photography types clarifies the practical strengths and limitations previously discussed.
Who Should Buy the Samsung HZ15W?
- Casual photographers needing a simple, versatile zoom compact.
- Travelers on a budget who want decent image quality without fuss.
- Beginners who want automatic shooting modes and face detection.
- Cheapskates who want 10x zoom and some basic manual control but no RAW.
Pros:
- Very affordable (~$330)
- Handy 24-240mm zoom lens
- Decent sensorshift stabilization
- Simple, lightweight design
Cons:
- Small sensor limits image quality
- Slow autofocus
- No RAW support
- Limited video capabilities
Who Should Eye the Sigma DP3 Merrill?
- Enthusiasts and professionals desiring top-tier image quality in a compact.
- Portrait and landscape photographers who prioritize detail and color.
- Those comfortable with manual focusing and slower shooting pace.
- Photographers willing to invest (~$1350) for unique Foveon sensor advantages.
Pros:
- Large APS-C Foveon sensor with stunning detail
- Sharp, fast 75mm prime lens
- Manual exposure and focus controls for creative shooting
- RAW format support
Cons:
- No autofocus or image stabilization
- No built-in flash or viewfinder
- Relatively slow camera performance
- Higher price point
Final Verdict: Two Cameras, Two Worlds
If you crave versatility, ease, and affordability - with decent image quality for everyday snapshots and travel - the Samsung HZ15W is a competent compact that won’t break the bank while covering a wide range of scenarios. It’s your no-nonsense companion for casual photography and quick shooting.
If image quality is king and you want a compact that punches well above its weight in detail and color fidelity - and you don’t mind manual focus, slower operation, and a narrower lens - the Sigma DP3 Merrill rewards patience with images that can rival much pricier mirrorless setups. It’s a niche camera for enthusiasts and pros who want a portable yet serious tool for portraits and landscape work.
Between these two, your choice boils down to what kind of photographer you are:
- Budget-conscious, all-round casual shooter: go Samsung HZ15W
- Serious manual shooter, image quality fanatic: choose Sigma DP3 Merrill
Whichever path you take, I hope this deep dive has armed you with the insights you need to make a confident choice. After all, the best camera is the one you’ll enjoy using - and the one that helps you bring your creative vision to life.
Happy shooting!
Samsung HZ15W vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ15W | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung HZ15W | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
Also called as | WB550 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-02-23 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-240mm (10.0x) | 75mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16s | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 249 grams (0.55 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $330 | $1,353 |