Samsung HZ35W vs Samsung ST100

Samsung HZ35W vs ST100: Choosing Your Ideal Compact Superzoom in 2010

With a decade-plus of camera testing under my belt, I’ve held thousands of compacts, bridge, and superzoom cameras - tuning in on everything from sensor nuances, autofocus crispness, and handling quirks to real-world image quality and performance in the wild. Today, we’re stepping back into the 2010 camera scene to pit two Korean contenders against each other: the Samsung HZ35W, aka “WB650,” a small-sensor superzoom titan, versus its sleeker cousin, the Samsung ST100, an ultracompact marvel with a few intriguing trade-offs.

Both cameras carve out very different niches, yet they share an era, sensor technology, and brand DNA. This review blends hands-on experience with technical insight - no fluff, just the kind of down-to-earth analysis you’d want before making a purchase, whether you’re a casual snapshooter, an enthusiast, or a photojournalist who appreciates compact versatility.

A Matter of Size and Feel: Holding First Impressions

Imagine sliding the HZ35W and the ST100 into your hands. The HZ35W feels like a solid pocket companion with a reassuring heft: it measures 107x61x28 mm and weighs 245 grams. The ST100 is even more pocket-friendly - a svelte ultracompact at 100x60x20 mm and a mere 155 grams - a camera that practically disappears in your jacket or purse.

Ergonomically, the HZ35W sports a more substantial grip and a chunky, straightforward button layout. The ST100, while pretty and streamlined, sacrifices some handling comfort and physical controls for its sleekness.

From my testing, cameras like the HZ35W are better suited for longer shooting sessions, especially when zooming or manual focus precision matters. The ST100 appeals more to those craving pocket portability or a camera that won’t announce your intention in street or travel contexts. It’s a trade-off classic to compact superzooms - comfort and control versus tiny and subtle.

Design Under the Hood: Control Layout and User Interface

Flipping the cameras over, the differences extend beyond size.

The HZ35W’s design adheres to the classic superzoom mold - mode dial, dedicated exposure priority modes (including shutter and aperture priority), and a clear ISO button. This flexibility hints the HZ35W is designed for users who want to do more than just point and shoot.

In contrast, the ST100 adopts a minimalist-reliant approach. Its touchscreen (a first for Samsung at the time) offers an alternative interface for setting focus points and navigating menus. While the touchscreen is handy, it lacks the precision or tactile feedback of physical buttons during fast-paced shooting. Aperture and shutter priority modes are absent, meaning full manual exposure control is off the menu.

If you appreciate tactile dials and analog-style shooting shells, the HZ35W is your companion. However, if you want a clean, touchscreen-forward experience with fewer menu dives - and a lighter control load - the ST100’s design hits the spot.

Sensor Specs and Image Quality: Peeling Back the Pixels

Both cameras share the same sensor size: a 1/2.3-inch CCD measuring 6.17 x 4.55 mm, with an imaging area of roughly 28.07 mm². While this is quite small by any standard (especially compared to APS-C or full frames), it was typical for compact cameras a decade ago.

The HZ35W offers 12 megapixels, while the ST100 edges slightly ahead at 14 megapixels, promising sharper images on paper. Yet, images from the ST100 sometimes show more noise at higher ISOs due to cramming more pixels into the same sensor real estate - a frequent CCD balancing act of that era.

Both cameras include an anti-aliasing filter, which reduces moiré but can slightly soften fine detail - a necessary evil in compact sensor designs.

Testing both cameras side by side, I observed:

• Color Rendition: Both yield acceptably accurate colors in good light, but the HZ35W displays slightly warmer tones, pleasing for portraiture.
• Dynamic Range: Limited on both, with highlights clipping noticeably in contrasty scenes and shadow detail lost in darker areas - typical of 1/2.3” CCDs without sophisticated tone mapping.
• High ISO: Neither excels beyond ISO 400; the ST100’s 14MP sensor reveals more grain and noise artifacts at ISO 800+. The HZ35W’s 12MP sensor is just a tad more forgiving in low light.

Bottom line: Both cameras serve casual shooters well in daylight or well-lit conditions but struggle in challenging light or for large print landscapes.

Viewing Your Shot: Screen and Viewfinder Usability

Both cameras omit viewfinders. This forces reliance on their rear LCDs - a common compromise in slim, budget compacts.

The HZ35W packs a 3-inch fixed LCD with a resolution of 614k dots - adequate, but nothing to brag about. The ST100 ups the ante with a 3.5-inch touchscreen and a sharper resolution of 1152k dots, facilitating easier framing and menu navigation.

In bright conditions, the ST100’s larger, more vibrant screen makes composing shots and reviewing images more comfortable. However, touchscreen responsiveness can suffer under intense sunlight or with gloved hands - something the HZ35W’s physical controls dodge entirely.

The trade-off here aligns with the cameras’ target users: HZ35W leans on classic physical usability, ST100 embraces early touchscreen tech.

Zoom and Lens Performance: Reach Versus Brightness

Lens versatility is frequently the star in these small sensor superzooms:

• HZ35W: 24-360 mm equivalent, 15x optical zoom, maximum aperture ranges from f/3.2 (wide) to f/5.8 (tele)
• ST100: 35-175 mm equivalent, 5x optical zoom, maximum aperture from f/3.6 to f/4.8

The HZ35W's 15x zoom is a clear winner for anyone wanting to capture distant wildlife, detail in architecture, or subjects far afield. In practical test shoots, it excelled at maintaining adequate sharpness and contrast well into the telephoto range - a remarkable feat given the small sensor and lens size.

The ST100's shorter reach limits zoom utility in wildlife and sports but is ample for street photography and everyday snapshots. The lens is slightly faster at telephoto compared to the HZ35W’s narrower aperture, which helps in tricky light.

Both cameras include optical image stabilization, crucial for compensating at longer focal lengths. Stability in the HZ35W is effective but slightly less forgiving than the ST100’s, possibly helped by a smaller zoom range.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Critical for Action and Candid Moments

Here we spot significant differences:

• The HZ35W features single autofocus with face detection and AF tracking, but no continuous autofocus or buffer for burst shooting. Autofocus leverages contrast detection; accuracy is fair, but speed feels sluggish, especially in low light or zoomed-in shots - a symptom common among early 2010 superzooms.

• The ST100 offers single autofocus with touch-to-focus via the LCD and face detection but lacks AF tracking or continuous AF modes. Its autofocus tends to be marginally quicker and more responsive than the HZ35W’s, thanks to a less complex lens system and touchscreen AF targeting.

Neither camera is designed for high-speed action photography; neither offers burst shooting capabilities. For casual street or travel use where moments are more relaxed, autofocus suffices. But wildlife or sports shooters should look elsewhere.

Image Stabilization and Macro Abilities: Steady Shots and Close Encounters

Both cameras implement optical image stabilization (OIS), a must-have to reduce handshake blur in superzoom compacts. Field tests confirmed OIS effectiveness up to moderate telephoto zoom settings - shots at 360mm on the HZ35W were notably steadier than expected handheld.

Regarding close focus:

• The HZ35W can focus as close as 3 cm, allowing fine macro shots of flowers, insects, or textures.
• The ST100’s macro range is about 5 cm, which is respectable but less intimate.

While neither camera provides focus bracketing, stacking, or post-focus modes that would delight macro enthusiasts, the HZ35W marginally earns the edge for precise close-up photography thanks to its more flexible focusing range.

Video Features: HD Recording with Caveats

Both cameras deliver HD video at 1280x720 resolution at 30 fps using Motion JPEG codec - decent for casual video but limited compared to AVCHD or emerging HD standards even then.

Neither model supports microphone or headphone jacks, curtailing quality audio control. Both lack advanced video stabilization or high frame rate slow-motion modes.

So, if video features matter heavily, these cameras are pale imitations of modern hybrid shooters.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Powering Your Photos

Neither camera breaks new ground here:

• The HZ35W uses the SLB-11A rechargeable lithium-ion battery; the ST100’s battery is unspecified in official specs but follows a similar small compact format. Battery life hovers around 200-300 shots per charge under practical use, typical for compacts of the era.

• Storage varies: HZ35W supports SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, whereas the ST100 opts for the smaller MicroSD/MicroSDHC format - a point to consider if you already have memory cards.

• Neither model offers wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC), which is unsurprising for 2010 but feels cumbersome today.

• HDMI and USB 2.0 ports are standard for image transfer.

Durability and Weather Resistance: Can They Brave the Elements?

Both cameras lack weather sealing, waterproofing, dustproofing, shockproofing, or freezeproofing. They are consumer-grade compacts built mostly for fair-weather shooting, or indoor-to-outdoor transitions in mild conditions.

For rugged adventure photographers, these are not prime choices. However, the HZ35W's slightly bulkier build provides marginally better grip and feeling of resilience.

Real World Photography in Key Genres: Who Excels Where?

Let’s dive deeper into practical shooting scenarios, covering major photographic disciplines:

Portrait Photography

Both cameras feature face detection autofocus and produce pleasing skin tones under daylight. The HZ35W’s warmer color balance and 24mm wide angle lenses offer more compositional creativity, including environmental portraits.

Bokeh - soft background blur - is limited for both due to tiny sensors and relatively small maximum apertures, but the HZ35W’s longer zoom lets you isolate subjects better at 360mm focal length.

Eye-detection autofocus is not supported, which limits precision focusing on eyes - a big gap for serious portrait work.

Landscape Photography

Resolution differences (12MP vs. 14MP) are minor but the bigger challenge is limited dynamic range. Both produce competent images in good light, but lose shadow detail quickly.

The HZ35W’s wider 24mm equivalent focal length lets you capture sweeping vistas better. No weather sealing means you’ll need care in adverse conditions.

Wildlife Photography

If you want to test superzoom limits, the HZ35W dominates - 15x zoom to 360mm helps reach distant fauna.

Autofocus speed and tracking are modest at best, so you won’t catch fast-moving critters or birds in flight reliably.

Low burst rates (non-existent continuous shooting) make action shots guesswork.

The ST100’s shorter zoom and slower lens hamper wildlife utility.

Sports Photography

Neither camera supports high frame rates, continuous autofocus tracking, or sports modes.

Low light AF struggles exacerbate the problem. Both are “snappers,” not sports cams.

Street Photography

Here’s where the ST100 shines: compact, lightweight, discreet, with touchscreen focusing - ideal for quick candid snaps.

The HZ35W is bulkier and more conspicuous, but offers better zoom for creative framing on the street.

Both suffer in low light due to sensor size and lack of high ISO performance, though.

Macro Photography

The HZ35W’s 3cm macro focus beats the ST100’s 5cm, enabling closer, more detailed shots of tiny subjects.

No advanced focusing enhancements mean patience and care are essential.

Night and Astrophotography

With maximum ISO 3200, tiny sensors, and limited dynamic range, expect noisy, underwhelming night images from either camera.

Long exposures capped at 16 seconds (HZ35W) and 8 seconds (ST100) might tempt night experimenters, but noise dominates.

Neither supports bulb mode or advanced astro features.

Video Capabilities

Both offer 720p HD at 30 fps in Motion JPEG format - a bit chunky and inferior compared to AVCHD.

No mic inputs or advanced stabilization.

Useful for casual home videos, but don’t expect cinematic results.

Travel Photography

The selection here depends on travel style.

If you pack light and want everyday versatility, the ST100’s core strengths - portability, touchscreen, discreet operation - make it a solid travel companion.

For travelers prioritizing zoom reach and more control for landscapes and cultural documentation, the HZ35W’s 15x zoom and manual exposure modes pay dividends.

Battery life and storage are similar enough not to sway decisions.

Professional Use

Neither camera can replace professional gear. No RAW support, limited manual control (ST100 almost none), modest sensor and lens specs prevent professional workflow integration.

They serve better as backups or casual cameras.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Fixed Wins and Limits

Both cameras come with built-in fixed lenses, typical for compacts.

Samsung has never offered lens interchangeability or adaptor systems on these models.

Your creative options hinge on built-in zoom ranges and optical quality alone.

This limits versatility compared to mirrorless or DSLR systems, but also means hassle-free shooting with less gear.

Connectivity and Wireless Features: Staying Connected or Not

Neither camera supports Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or NFC, reflecting tech norms in 2010.

You’re confined to USB 2.0 data transfer and HDMI output.

Remote control apps or wireless sharing are off the table - worth knowing if you crave social media-ready convenience.

Overall Performance Scores and Genre Breakdown

While neither model was extensively tested by DxOmark or similar labs, we can summarize performance scoring based on hands-on experience and user reports:

• Samsung HZ35W: Strong in zoom range and manual control; moderate image quality; slower autofocus; good ergonomics.
• Samsung ST100: Best in portability and touchscreen interface; slightly higher resolution sensor; limited controls and zoom; faster AF.

Who Should Buy Which?

User Type	Recommended Camera	Reasoning
Casual Everyday Shooters	ST100	Lightweight, easy touchscreen, decent zoom for daily use
Travel Photographers	ST100 (compact approach), HZ35W (versatility and zoom)	ST100 for stealth and portability; HZ35W for creativity and reach
Enthusiastic Amateurs	HZ35W	Manual exposure, longer zoom, better ergonomics
Wildlife and Sports	Neither Ideal	Too slow AF and burst rates; better alternatives exist
Portrait Lovers	HZ35W	Slightly warmer tones, longer zoom for subject isolation
Macro Hobbyists	HZ35W	Closer focusing distance
Budget-Conscious Buyers	ST100	Lower price, still capable for casual use
Video Content Creators	Neither	Limited codecs, resolutions, no audio input

Wrapping Up: The Samsung HZ35W vs ST100 Face-Off

Doing a side-by-side on these two reveals thoughtful design choices that highlight Samsung’s strategy to serve distinctly different small-sensor shooter niches circa 2010.

The HZ35W is a practical superzoom tool with respectable manual controls and reach that appeals to photographers willing to sacrifice pocket size for creative latitude - especially those dabbling in landscapes, quality portraits, or macro details.

The ST100 pushes ultracompact limits with touch interface and an ultra-light design, perfect for image-makers who prefer snap-and-go convenience with a decent zoom range for travel and street photo-journaling.

Neither camera is revolutionary, but both hold value if you understand their strengths and shackles. Expect moderate image quality reflective of tiny sensors and dated tech - but, with care and patience, these compacts can capture memorable moments.

Sample Image Gallery: In the Field Comparisons

To get a real sense of what these cameras produce, here are unedited images taken with both cameras outdoors in bright, overcast, and indoor conditions:

Note the sharper detail and slightly warmer colors on the HZ35W shots, but the ST100 frames feel cleaner and better exposed in some daylight situations due to touchscreen focusing.

This comprehensive comparison hopes to inform your choice with honesty, technical rigor, and that touch of storytelling flair nurtured only through years behind a shutter. Find a camera that matches your shooting style, and happy picture-taking!

Author’s Note: For enthusiasts aiming for the highest image quality or advanced video work, I recommend exploring newer mirrorless or advanced compacts, as Samsung’s 2010 superzoom compacts, while charming, fall short of modern expectations.

Published June 2024, based on personal hands-on testing and technical analysis of Samsung HZ35W and ST100 cameras.