Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37


82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Announced February 2012
- Successor is Sigma DP2 Merrill

Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill: A Real-World Compact Camera Showdown
When I first got my hands on the Samsung HZ35W and the Sigma DP1 Merrill, I knew I was facing two very different beasts, catering to distinct photography styles yet both offering compelling advantages for enthusiasts on the compact spectrum. Over years of shooting and testing many cameras, I find that the true measure of a camera’s value is not just the spec sheet but how it performs across real-world scenarios - how it handles in your hands, how its images breathe, and how seamlessly it integrates into your creative workflow.
In this detailed comparison, I’ll walk you through each camera’s strengths, weaknesses, and the practical impact of their core technologies. This isn’t just about technical specs; it’s about deciding which camera might best unlock your photographic vision.
A Tale of Two Compact Cameras: Design and Handling First Impressions
Let’s start with the physical design and ergonomics since the feel of a camera can set the tone for your shooting experience.
The Samsung HZ35W is a quintessential superzoom compact - small, relatively lightweight at 245g, and designed for convenience. Its dimensions (107 x 61 x 28mm) make it pocketable for casual outings or travel.
In contrast, the Sigma DP1 Merrill is noticeably chunkier (122 x 67 x 64mm) and heavier at 330g. This reflects its large-sensor compact nature and a robust build quality more akin to a DSLR-style grip. While it’s less pocket-friendly, I appreciated its solid heft during my shoots - especially when steadying the camera handheld for longer exposures.
Ergonomically, the Samsung leans into simplicity with minimal controls - great for beginners or on-the-go shooters who prefer quick operation. You get basic manual exposure modes but nothing extensive.
The Sigma, however, feels like a camera meant for deliberate shooting. Its control layout, while not overwhelming, prioritizes manual settings with dedicated dials and buttons. If you enjoy tweaking aperture, shutter speed, and ISO swiftly, the DP1 Merrill delivers a friendlier interface.
Under the Hood: Sensor Technologies and Image Quality Insights
Here lies the most fundamental difference between these models: sensor technology and resulting image quality.
The Samsung HZ35W sports a small 1/2.3” CCD sensor measuring just 6.17 x 4.55 mm, with a 12-megapixel resolution. This sensor size is typical for superzoom compacts but inherently limits image quality, especially at higher ISOs or in low light. The CCD technology offers decent color rendition at base ISO but shows noise and dynamic range constraints as you raise ISO beyond 400. There is also an optical image stabilization system to combat camera shake in telephoto shots, a vital feature given the 24-360mm equivalent zoom lens.
By contrast, the Sigma DP1 Merrill flaunts a large APS-C sensor (24 x 16 mm), one of the biggest you can find in a non-interchangeable lens compact camera. Its unique Foveon X3 CMOS sensor technology captures full color information at every pixel layer, offering exceptional color depth and detail resolution - 15 megapixels total, but with a unique structure distinct from Bayer sensors. This translates to stunning image quality with superb sharpness and color accuracy, particularly appealing for portraits, landscapes, and still life where detail matters profoundly.
However, the DP1 Merrill lacks image stabilization, which requires a sturdy hand or tripod in lower light.
Seeing the Scene: LCD and Viewfinder Usability
Both cameras forgo an electronic viewfinder, relying fully on their rear LCDs for composing shots.
The Samsung offers a 3.0-inch fixed LCD with 614k dots resolution, decent for framing and image review. Bright daylight visibility is modest but usable.
The Sigma ups the ante slightly with a 920k-dot LCD, providing crisper on-screen details - a boon when judging focus and exposure critically. Yet, it lacks a touchscreen interface, which under current standards feels limiting, though not uncommon for cameras from its release era.
Zoom Versus Prime: Lenses and Focal Range Realities
Lens versatility profoundly shapes how you shoot.
The Samsung HZ35W’s 24-360mm equivalent 15x zoom is its core strength - a true travel and event companion. This focal range covers wide-angle landscapes to tight wildlife or sports scenes, though the narrow maximum apertures (f/3.2-5.8) imply limited low-light ability and shallow depth of field.
The Sigma DP1 Merrill opts for a fixed 28mm equivalent lens with a bright f/2.8 aperture. Though unable to zoom, this prime lens offers superb image quality with minimal distortion and impressive sharpness even wide open. The wide angle is perfect for landscapes, environmental portraits, and street photography. With its large sensor and bright lens, it excels in creative control and bokeh rendition compared to typical compacts.
Performance For Different Genres: Strengths & Weaknesses Explored
Below I detail how these systems stack up in key photography disciplines, based on my extensive hands-on experience:
Portrait Photography
The Sigma DP1 Merrill shines here. The combination of its APS-C Foveon sensor and prime f/2.8 lens delivers nuanced skin tones and creamy bokeh that feel painterly, something rare among fixed-lens compacts. Manual focus precision allows you to nail critical eye sharpness, a must-have for impactful portraits.
The Samsung HZ35W, with its variable aperture and smaller sensor, produces flatter images with less depth. While its face detection autofocus is supportive, it cannot match the richness or subject isolation the Sigma achieves.
Landscape Photography
Wide dynamic range and resolution advocate strongly for the Sigma’s sensor. I saw remarkable latitude in recovering shadows and highlights, plus the ultra-detailed files hold up excellently for large prints. The 28mm focal length is ideal for sweeping vistas.
The Samsung’s superzoom lens gives versatility to capture distant details but suffers from limited dynamic range and noise at higher ISOs. It’s better for casual landscapes where ease and framing flexibility matter more than ultimate quality.
Wildlife and Sports Photography
For action, the Samsung is flexible with its long zoom and in-camera optical stabilization. However, its contrast-detection autofocus and lack of burst mode limit its ability to track fast-moving subjects smoothly.
The Sigma DP1 Merrill is designed for contemplative shooting, not speed. Its slow autofocus and absence of continuous AF make it ill-suited for capturing wildlife or sports in motion.
Street Photography
In the realm of low-profile candid shooting, the Sigma’s discreet design and fast prime lens offer advantages. Its quiet shutter and wide aperture empower handheld shots in varying light, though its bulk could draw attention.
The Samsung’s smaller size aids portability and stealthiness but slower AF speed and zoom lens may make it cumbersome for quick reaction shots.
Macro Photography
The Samsung includes macro capabilities down to 3 cm, allowing close-up captures with decent detail. Its optical stabilization helps reduce blur at close distances.
The Sigma lacks dedicated macro but its sharp prime lens can capture fine textures when you physically approach subjects, although minimum focusing distances may not be as forgiving.
Night and Astrophotography
The Sigma’s high native ISO ceiling (6400) combined with superior sensor noise control from its Foveon tech means it can produce cleaner night images, especially when paired with a tripod. Manual exposure modes facilitate long exposures essential for astrophotography.
The Samsung tops out at ISO 3200 with modest noise handling, coupled with slower lenses limiting light intake. It is less ideal for demanding low-light scenes.
Video Capabilities
Both cameras record in Motion JPEG with the Samsung maxing at 1280x720 resolution, while the Sigma caps at 640x480. Neither supports advanced video features like 4K, in-body stabilization for video, or audio inputs.
If video is a priority, neither option is compelling by today’s standards.
Travel Photography
Considering versatility, weight, and battery life, the Samsung HZ35W’s superzoom and compact form make it a natural travel companion for casual shooters who want everything in one handy package.
Sigma’s DP1 Merrill suits travelers who prioritize image quality over zoom and are willing to carry a larger fixed-lens camera for serious landscape, street, and portrait work.
Professional Work and Workflow Integration
For professional workflows demanding raw capture and precise color rendition, the Sigma’s native raw support and superior sensor output stand apart. Its files produce stunning results after careful processing, ideal for studio work or high-end prints.
The Samsung lacks raw output, limiting post-processing flexibility; its JPEGs serve casual use well but offer less latitude for professional editing.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing and Durability
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged construction. Both require careful handling in harsh environments, though the Sigma’s more robust body suggests better longevity with frequent use.
Autofocus, Stabilization and Usability Examined
The Samsung features contrast-detection AF with face detection, adequate for well-lit, stationary scenes. Its optical stabilization effectively reduces camera shake through the zoom range.
The Sigma lacks AF systems for continuous or face detection, placing burden on manual focusing skill. No stabilization means tripod use is often necessary for shaky or low-light conditions.
Connectivity, Storage, and Battery Life
Neither support wireless connectivity, Bluetooth, or NFC, reflecting their era of production.
Storage is handled via SD cards on both; neither offers dual slots.
Battery life specifics are scant, but I found both cameras adequate for a day of shooting at moderate use, with the Samsung benefiting from a lighter battery and smaller sensor demands.
Price and Value: Who Gets More Bang for the Buck?
The Samsung HZ35W was priced near $300 at release, aimed at budget-friendly enthusiasts seeking a do-it-all compact.
Sigma DP1 Merrill’s $1249 price point positions it as a serious investment into image quality for fine art, landscape, or portrait photographers.
While the Sigma carries a steep price, its image quality and unique sensor technology justify the premium in specialized use cases. Samsung’s camera offers a more accessible entry to travel and casual photography but with commensurate image limitations.
Real-World Outcomes: Sample Images and Visual Proof
Examining side-by-side sample images shows the Sigma’s superior detail, color fidelity, and low noise across diverse conditions. The Samsung delivers flexible framing and ease but with softer detail and higher noise in challenging light.
Overall Camera Performance Scores and Genre Ratings
Here’s a concise summary based on extensive testing benchmarks:
Camera | Overall Score | Portrait | Landscape | Wildlife | Sports | Street | Macro | Night | Video | Travel | Pro Work |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung HZ35W | Moderate | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | Fair | Poor | Poor | Good | Poor |
Sigma DP1 Merrill | High | Excellent | Excellent | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | Good | Poor | Fair | Excellent |
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Who Should Buy Which?
Having extensively tested both cameras in varied real-world shooting, here’s how I’d advise different photographers:
-
Travelers and casual users: The Samsung HZ35W is a reliable all-rounder with remarkable zoom flexibility and decent image quality for its class. Its lightweight body, optical stabilization, and simple interface make it ideal for snapshots, events, and travel stories where convenience is king.
-
Fine art, landscape, and portrait photographers: The Sigma DP1 Merrill is a specialized tool that rewards patience and creativity with unrivaled image fidelity among large-sensor compacts. If you’re willing to shoot deliberately, learn manual focus nuances, and invest in post-processing, it’s a gem for quality-driven work.
-
Wildlife and sports enthusiasts: Neither camera excels here. Consider more modern cameras with advanced autofocus and burst modes better suited to fast action.
-
Street photographers: The Sigma’s visual fidelity and quiet operation suit thoughtful street captures, but if you prioritize minimal size and quick reaction, the Samsung’s superzoom is more versatile albeit less refined.
-
Budget-conscious buyers: The Samsung offers excellent value for casual to intermediate photographers not demanding high-end image quality or raw shooting.
My Testing Methodology: How I Reached These Conclusions
Over 15 years testing cameras involves shooting hundreds of images across diverse conditions - daylight, low light, indoor, outdoors, fast motion, deliberate compositions - and analyzing results visually and through software tools. I consider ergonomics, menu systems, and workflow integration coupled with measurable technical metrics like resolution charts and noise profiles.
For this review, I conducted side-by-side shooting sessions with both cameras using identical subjects, lighting setups, and post-processing to isolate differences attributable strictly to camera hardware and software.
Summing Up
Both Samsung HZ35W and Sigma DP1 Merrill are worthy cameras in their own niches. I hope this in-depth comparison, intertwined with practical impressions and rigorous technical insights, empowers you to pick the one that harmonizes with your creative needs and shooting style.
Happy shooting - and may your images tell stories that words cannot!
Samsung HZ35W vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Samsung HZ35W | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung HZ35W | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also Known as | WB650 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-06-16 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | () |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | f/2.8 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
Display resolution | 614k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 16 secs | - |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) | 330 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | SLB-11A | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $300 | $1,250 |