Samsung HZ50W vs Sony HX400V
70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39


62 Imaging
44 Features
60 Overall
50
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony HX400V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Announced May 2010
- Other Name is WB5500
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 660g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Released February 2014
- Superseded the Sony HX300

Samsung HZ50W vs Sony HX400V: The Ultimate Small-Sensor Superzoom Showdown
When it comes to bridge cameras - those versatile all-in-one superzooms that flirt between compact ease and DSLR style - two models stand out from their respective eras and architectural philosophies: the 2010 Samsung HZ50W and the 2014 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V. Both claim to offer immense focal length reach and compact convenience. But how do they truly stack up against one another across a spectrum of photographic disciplines and real-world usage? Over years of relentless hands-on tests, I’ve put these two through their paces. Here’s an expert analysis for photo enthusiasts and pros looking to invest in a high-zoom bridge camera - without skimming on the details.
Seeing the Difference Before You Shoot: Design, Build, and Handling
To begin, let’s talk about how these cameras feel in-hand - an often underrated but critical aspect when shooting long sessions or carrying equipment across a day.
Samsung HZ50W is impressively lightweight at 426 grams and sports a relatively compact 116x83x91 mm body. Its traditional SLR-style bridge design makes it approachable, especially for users transitioning from compact cameras. The fixed 3” screen is modest with a resolution of 230k dots, and it isn’t touch-sensitive. This limits interactive menu navigation and focus area selection, creating a somewhat dated user experience.
On the other hand, the Sony HX400V tips the scale at 660 grams and carries a chunkier 130x93x103 mm chassis. That extra heft translates into a more substantial hand grip and steadier handling despite the longer zoom lens. The HX400V’s tilting 3” LCD panel with 921k dots resolution significantly enhances composition flexibility - especially for low or high-angle shots. It too lacks touchscreen support but compensates with an excellent electronic viewfinder covering 100% frame accuracy, where Samsung falls short with nondescript EVF specs.
Advantage? While Samsung delivers lightweight portability, Sony’s refined ergonomics and superior display technology provide a more immersive shooting experience, especially during prolonged field sessions.
Sensor and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Both cameras utilize the same sensor size class typical of compact superzooms: 1/2.3-inch sensors, but their technology and resolution profiles diverge sharply.
The Samsung HZ50W uses a 14-megapixel CCD sensor - a technology considered legacy by today’s standards. CCDs are known for decent color rendition and noise control in their heyday but typically lag behind CMOS sensors in speed and dynamic range. The sensor measures approximately 6.08 x 4.56 mm and outputs native ISO up to 3200 with an extended boost to 6400 but with obvious noise caveats.
The Sony HX400V packs a 20-megapixel backside-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor, a more modern design that significantly enhances light gathering and noise performance. With a similar sensor size (6.17 x 4.55 mm), this camera shoots at up to ISO 12800, giving it a broader exposure latitude and improved low-light aptitude. The antialias filter is present in both cameras to combat moiré, with Sony’s sensor benefitting from BSI efficiency.
In practical terms, the Sony HX400V produces noticeably sharper, more detailed images with better dynamic range, crucial for demanding landscapes or shadow recovery. Samsung’s CCD sensor fits casual snapshots but struggles with noise above ISO 800 and shows a narrower tonal gamut.
Control and Interface: User Experience Under the Hood
Good cameras marry hardware controls with intuitive interfaces. Let's see how these two fare in real-world handling and customization.
Looking at the Samsung HZ50W, the control layout follows a minimalist bridge camera blueprint: a mode dial supporting shutter and aperture priority, manual modes, and exposure compensation but no custom button illumination. The lack of a touchscreen means all settings are adjusted via buttons and dials - a bit tedious but familiar to traditionalists. It features a fixed screen and a fairly basic EVF, limiting compositional flexibility.
Meanwhile, the Sony HX400V elevates user interaction with a tilting LCD screen and a slightly larger mode dial incorporating finer granular controls. It supports a wider array of flash modes, including wireless flash with compatible units - a bonus for off-camera creative lighting. Sony’s camera also includes built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for seamless image transfer, GPS for location tagging, and more advanced exposure bracketing options - a decisive advantage for serious shooters.
In sum, Sony wins on interface innovation and connectivity, whereas Samsung offers a stripped-back, straightforward approach mostly adequate for casual use.
Autofocus and Burst Shooting: Catching the Moment
Fast and reliable autofocus (AF) is crucial across genres, particularly wildlife, sports, and street. How do these cameras perform?
The Samsung HZ50W employs a contrast-detection AF system with single AF and center-area AF modes but lacks face or animal eye detection and continuous AF tracking. This results in slower focusing in low light or moving subjects and a less forgiving experience for fast-paced photography.
In contrast, the Sony HX400V builds on the same contrast-detection basis but adds 9 AF points, center weighting, plus face-detection and AF tracking capabilities that notably improve subject acquisition and maintenance. It can shoot bursts at 10 frames per second (fps), a big step up from the Samsung, which either lacks or does not publish continuous shooting specs.
For wildlife and sports photographers, Sony’s more responsive focus system and higher frame rates make a tangible difference in catching decisive moments.
Zoom Lenses: Stretching the Limits of Creativity
Both cameras bill themselves as superzooms, but their lens specifications reveal quite different shooting ranges.
The Samsung HZ50W features a 26-676mm equivalent zoom (26x optical) with a maximum aperture that narrows from f/2.8 at the wide end to f/5.0 telephoto. The macro focus distance is 10 cm, which allows semi-close-ups but isn’t truly macro level. Optical image stabilization helps counter hand shake through the zoom range.
Sony’s HX400V boasts a whopping 24-1200mm equivalent lens (50x zoom), offering far greater reach albeit with a smaller maximum aperture of f/2.8-6.3. Its macro focus distance impresses at just 1 cm, enabling detailed close-up shots. It also employs optical image stabilization.
In real-world use, the wider angle on Sony aids landscapes and interiors, while the extended 1200mm allows true telephoto shots - birders and wildlife enthusiasts will appreciate this reach. Samsung’s lens is fast wide open but can’t compete on sheer zoom power or macro proximity.
Display and Viewfinding: Composing Your Frame
Shooting convenience often hinges on an articulated screen and an accurate electronic viewfinder.
Samsung’s fixed screen is serviceable but small and low resolution, limiting critical focus checks and menu interaction. Its electronic viewfinder specs are sparse, implying an inferior EVF experience.
Conversely, the Sony HX400V sports a high-resolution tilting LCD that dramatically enhances compositional versatility and image review clarity, coupled with a sizeable EVF with 100% frame coverage, important for precision framing in bright daylight.
Photographers who frequently shoot in challenging light or awkward angles will find Sony’s visual aids more satisfying and practical.
Sample Image Quality Side-by-Side
Nothing beats a visual comparison, so let's look at the two cameras’ photos across various scenarios.
Analyzing samples reveals Samsung’s images tend to show softer edge detail and less vibrant colors, especially under mixed lighting. Noise becomes readily apparent beyond ISO 400.
Sony’s output is noticeably crisper with better color accuracy and cleaner shadows. The extended zoom lets you isolate distant subjects with less quality loss, an advantage demonstrated in wildlife and sports shots. Portraits from Sony feel more lively due to better autofocus face detection and color rendering.
Performance Scores: How Do They Measure Up?
Using aggregated performance metrics from industry benchmarks provides an additional lens for evaluation.
Sony HX400V outperforms Samsung HZ50W in overall image quality, autofocus performance, burst shooting, and video capabilities. Samsung still scores respectably for ergonomics and simplicity but falls behind on nearly all technical fronts.
Specialized Genre Ratings: Which Camera Excels Where?
To help photographers focusing on specific fields, here’s how both cameras rank by photography discipline.
- Portraiture: Sony leads with skin tone reproduction and face detection.
- Landscape: Sony’s dynamic range and resolution beat Samsung’s limited sensor.
- Wildlife: Sony’s faster AF and longer zoom dominate.
- Sports: Sony supports higher frame rates and better tracking.
- Street: Samsung’s lighter weight and smaller size slightly advantage portability, but Sony’s better low-light AF wins overall.
- Macro: Sony’s 1 cm minimum focus distance gives it a clear edge.
- Night/Astro: Sony’s higher ISO and superior noise control render it more competent.
- Video: Sony supports 1080p60 with external mic input; Samsung capped at 720p.
- Travel: Sony’s zoom versatility and GPS make it a better companion, albeit heavier.
- Professional: Samsung falls short due to limited controls and file formats; Sony edges in workflow flexibility but both fall below interchangeable lens cameras.
Battery Life and Storage: Shooting Long Without Worry
Sony claims roughly 300 shots per battery charge versus Samsung’s unspecified but presumably shorter battery life due to older technology. Sony’s NP-BX1 battery and SD/Memory Stick compatibility offer modern convenience, while Samsung uses proprietary SLB-11A batteries and only supports SD/SDHC cards.
The Sony’s wireless connectivity also speeds image transfers during long trips - a notable practical benefit.
Video Capability Showdown
Video remains secondary for most bridge cameras, but Sony clearly offers superior video specs: Full HD 1080p recording at 60p/60i with AVCHD and MPEG-4 support, external mic input, and advanced flash sync for video fill lighting.
Samsung sticks to earlier-generation 720p HD at 30fps without audio input options, reflecting its 2010 heritage.
Sony is the better choice for casual videographers or vloggers who want acceptable motion quality and sound.
Price-to-Performance Verdict: What Are You Really Paying For?
Despite the larger zoom and superior feature set, Sony HX400V commands a higher price tag around $450 - a modest premium over Samsung’s sub-$250 positioning.
From my testing, Sony offers clear performance, convenience, and versatility benefits that justify this differential for most serious enthusiasts. Samsung HZ50W stands as a budget-friendly option geared more toward casual shooters or collectors interested in simpler superzoom experience.
Which Should You Choose? Tailoring to Your Photography Style
Choose Samsung HZ50W if:
- You need a lightweight, affordable superzoom camera for casual family snapshots or travel.
- You prioritize simplicity over advanced features.
- You mostly shoot in daylight and don’t require fast autofocus or high ISO.
- Your budget caps near $250 with limited upgrade options.
Choose Sony HX400V if:
- You want a versatile, feature-rich bridge superzoom with exceptional zoom reach.
- You shoot wildlife, sports or action, benefiting from faster AF and burst rates.
- You require better low-light performance and video functionality.
- You value connectivity features like GPS and Wi-Fi for travel or social sharing.
- You appreciate articulated screens and superior ergonomics.
Final Thoughts: The Evolution of the Superzoom Bridge Camera
The 2010 Samsung HZ50W and 2014 Sony HX400V represent distinct points in bridge camera evolution. While both provide all-in-one lenses that condense DSLR-like versatility into a single package, technological advancements in sensor design, processing power, autofocus sophistication, and connectivity sharply favor the Sony HX400V.
However, this does not render the Samsung obsolete - it remains a decent gateway into superzoom photography for casual users. Sony’s HX400V, meanwhile, strikes a compelling balance between portability, reach, and advanced controls for enthusiasts wanting more than just the basics without committing to larger, more expensive interchangeable lens systems.
Choosing between them ultimately depends on budget, shooting preferences, and desired feature set. For those valuing long zooms, sharper images, and modern conveniences, the Sony HX400V holds more promise four years after its launch compared to the decade-old Samsung.
Written from extensive hands-on testing and comparison across scenarios, this analysis aims to empower your next camera decision with authentic field-tested insights rather than marketing jargon. Whatever your path, happy shooting!
Samsung HZ50W vs Sony HX400V Specifications
Samsung HZ50W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung HZ50W | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX400V |
Also called | WB5500 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2010-05-03 | 2014-02-12 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-676mm (26.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.0 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 16 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.60 m | 8.50 m (ISO Auto) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Flash Off / Autoflash / Fill-flash / Slow Sync. / Advanced Flash / Rear Sync. / Wireless (with optional compliant flash) |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lbs) | 660 grams (1.46 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | SLB-11A | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SC/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $250 | $448 |