Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10 II
97 Imaging
38 Features
43 Overall
40
58 Imaging
51 Features
77 Overall
61
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Revealed September 2011
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-200mm (F2.8) lens
- 813g - 129 x 88 x 102mm
- Released June 2015
- Previous Model is Sony RX10
- Successor is Sony RX10 III
Photography Glossary Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10 II: A Comprehensive Comparison for Discerning Photographers
Selecting a camera is a nuanced decision contingent upon a spectrum of factors ranging from sensor technology to shooting ergonomics. The Samsung MV800 and Sony RX10 II occupy markedly different positions within the imaging device hierarchy, and a rigorous comparative analysis tailored for enthusiasts and professionals is essential to demystify their practical value.
This article draws upon extensive hands-on testing, sensor benchmarking, and field performance evaluation to deliver an objective, deeply technical, and scenario-driven comparison of these two models. We examine them from hardware, imaging, control, and application perspectives, highlighting where each excels or falls short to aid in clear purchase discernment.
Physical Design and Handling: Ergonomics and Size That Affect Usability
When analyzing camera handling, physical size, weight, and control surface layout dictate comfort over extended shooting sessions and operational efficiency in the field. The Samsung MV800 is a compact, pocket-friendly device focused on casual portability, whereas the Sony RX10 II adopts a pseudo-SLR bridge form factor with substantial bulk tailored for user control.

-
Samsung MV800: Weighing only 121 grams with a slim profile (92 x 56 x 10 mm), it is exceptionally portable. However, this compactness comes at a cost in terms of grip ergonomics, with limited handling surfaces, making it less suitable for prolonged handheld use or operation with gloves.
-
Sony RX10 II: At 813 grams and dimensions of 129 x 88 x 102 mm, it demands dedicated carrying space but affords a robust grip with pronounced handholds and tactile feedback. This size advantage translates into superior stability, especially critical when using long telephoto focal lengths or in dynamic shooting environments.
In sum, the MV800 prioritizes casual snapshot use and absolute portability, while the RX10 II’s ergonomics align with professional ergonomics and operational endurance.
Control Layout and User Interface: Navigating Complexity with Efficiency
The user interface and physical controls drastically impact a camera's responsiveness and the creative freedom a photographer enjoys. Let’s compare the two models on this front.

Samsung MV800
- Features a touchscreen-only input mechanism and a tilting 3.0-inch screen with moderate 460k-dot resolution.
- Omits physical manual dials or buttons for exposure controls; lacks dedicated shutter speed or aperture adjustments.
- Does not include a viewfinder, relying solely on the LCD for composition.
- The absence of manual exposure modes restricts creative control, signaling orientation towards casual users who prefer automated workflows.
Sony RX10 II
- Incorporates a traditional DSLR-esque control array including mode dials, customizable buttons, and exposure compensation wheel.
- Offers a high-resolution 3.0-inch tilting screen (1,229k dots) supplemented with a 2,359-dot electronic viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.7x magnification.
- Supports full manual exposure modes as well as shutter and aperture priority, enabling granular exposure control.
- Customizable function menus and illuminated buttons assist operation in low-light conditions.
- The professional-grade user interface facilitates rapid adjustments enabling responsiveness crucial in dynamic shooting situatations such as wildlife or sports.
Conclusion: The RX10 II provides a vastly superior control experience for the enthusiast or professional seeking tactile feedback and manual finesse, whereas the MV800’s touchscreen-centric design runs the risk of sluggishness and less intuitive control under complex scenarios.
Imaging Fundamentals: Sensor Technology and Resolution Insights
At the heart of photographic output is the sensor. Evaluating sensor size, type, and resolution provides insight into image quality potential, dynamic range, and ISO performance.

| Feature | Samsung MV800 | Sony RX10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | 1/2.3" CCD (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1" BSI-CMOS (13.2 x 8.8 mm) |
| Sensor Area | 28.07 mm² | 116.16 mm² |
| Resolution | 16 Megapixels | 20 Megapixels |
| Native ISO Range | 80 - 3200 | 125 - 12800 |
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI CMOS |
| Anti-Aliasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
| Raw Support | No | Yes |
Analysis
The RX10 II’s one-inch BSI-CMOS sensor eclipses the MV800’s smaller 1/2.3” CCD both in size and technology. The much larger sensor area correlates with superior light gathering capabilities, contributing to enhanced image quality, dynamic range, and high ISO performance that professionals require. The CCD sensor in the MV800, a technology dated by 2011 standards, inherently has less sensitivity and dynamic range.
The RX10 II’s ability to capture RAW files offers extensive post-processing latitude, critical for workflows demanding fine tonal and color gradations. Conversely, the MV800’s lack of RAW output limits flexibility, confining users to long-exposure or high-contrast scenes in compressed JPEGs.
Practically, the difference manifests in:
- Better low-light fidelity and reduced noise in RX10 II imagery
- Greater depth-of-field control and bokeh potential from the larger sensor
- Superior image sharpness and detail rendering by virtue of higher resolution and sensor quality
For photographers prioritizing image quality, especially in challenging lighting or professional print applications, the RX10 II’s sensor technology is a decisive advantage.
Exposure and Autofocus Systems: Accuracy and Speed Under the Lens
Responsiveness and focus accuracy are pivotal in disciplines ranging from wildlife to portraiture.
Samsung MV800
- Employs a contrast-detection AF system with face detection.
- Single autofocus mode with no manual or shutter priority exposure controls.
- Continuous AF and tracking AF modes are limited or non-existent; focus points are unspecified.
- Max shutter speed capped at 1/2000s.
- Optical image stabilization integrated to counter handheld shake.
Sony RX10 II
- Utilizes a 25-point contrast-detection autofocus system with advanced tracking capabilities.
- Includes continuous, single-shot, face detection, and selective AF modes.
- Supports manual focus with focus peaking aids.
- Max mechanical shutter speed 1/2000s and electronic shutter up to 1/32000s allow freezing high-speed action.
- Optical stabilization via a complex mechanism to support telephoto shooting.
Operational Testing Notes:
- RX10 II delivers rapid autofocus acquisition and accurate tracking during burst shooting, critical for fast-moving subjects.
- MV800’s AF system is comparatively slower and less reliable in low contrast or low light.
- RX10 II’s manual focus facilitates precision in macro and landscape applications, which is inaccessible on MV800.
For sports, wildlife, and dynamic photography, RX10 II’s autofocus system and shutter options are more than adequate to meet professional demands. The MV800 suits spontaneous stills but lacks the versatility.
Lens and Zoom Versatility: Focal Ranges and Aperture Considerations
Fixed lens systems characterize both cameras, but their optical specifications and physical reach differ substantially.
| Specification | Samsung MV800 | Sony RX10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Focal Length Range | 26-130mm (5x optical) | 24-200mm (8.3x optical) |
| Maximum Aperture | f/3.3 - f/5.9 | Constant f/2.8 |
| Minimum Focus Distance | Not Specified | 3 cm |
| Optical Stabilization | Yes | Yes |
Commentary
The RX10 II offers a longer 24-200mm range - practically 8.3x zoom - with a consistently bright aperture of f/2.8 throughout the range. This constant aperture allows for consistent exposure and shallower depth of field effects at telephoto settings.
The MV800’s smaller zoom range and slower variable aperture restrict its utility in low-light and telephoto shooting scenarios. Moreover, the min focus distance of RX10 II at 3 cm makes it substantially better for macro-style close-ups compared to no macro data available on MV800.
Overall, the RX10 II’s lens system is more versatile across a broader range of photographic disciplines.
LCD Screens and Viewfinder Comparison: Composing and Reviewing Shots
Effective image composition tools play a critical role in fast workflows and framing accuracy.

-
Samsung MV800: Sports a tilting 3.0-inch touchscreen LCD with 460k dots. The limited resolution restricts accuracy in checking fine detail. Absence of a viewfinder mandates composing entirely on-screen, which can be difficult under bright conditions or action photography.
-
Sony RX10 II: Has a superior 3.0-inch tilting LCD with 1,229k dots plus a high-definition electronic viewfinder boasting 2,359k dots, 100% field coverage, and 0.7x magnification. This dual system allows stable, precise composition even in challenging lighting.
The EVF is a critical advantage for controlled framing and reduces eye strain during long shoots or in intense sunlight scenarios, tipping professional usability heavily in favor of the RX10 II.
Battery Life and Storage: Endurance and Workflow Implications
For extended shoots, battery performance and storage compatibility influence operational continuity.
| Feature | Samsung MV800 | Sony RX10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Life | Unknown | Approximately 400 shots |
| Battery Type | BP70 (Proprietary) | NP-FW50 Rechargeable |
| Storage Type | MicroSD (1 slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo (1 slot) |
Although official battery life figures for the MV800 are unavailable, typical compact camera endurance aligns with 200-300 shots. The RX10 II offers significantly better stamina, suited to prolonged fieldwork, supplemented by flexible storage media compatible with professional workflows.
Connectivity and Additional Capabilities: Data Transfer and Wireless Functions
Timely image delivery and remote operation are important workflow considerations.
-
Samsung MV800: Lacks wireless connectivity. USB 2.0 for data transfer and HDMI out for external display are present but minimal.
-
Sony RX10 II: Built-in Wi-Fi and NFC support enable remote control and fast image transfer, important for event photography or rapid online sharing. HDMI and USB 2.0 interfaces match the MV800 but with enhanced protocols.
For modern workflows requiring agility, the RX10 II's wireless capabilities form a significant operational advantage.
Video Performance: Resolution and Professional Features
Video capabilities are increasingly indispensable even for still-centric photographers.
| Feature | Samsung MV800 | Sony RX10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Max Video Resolution | 1280x720 (HD) @ 30fps | 3840x2160 (4K) @ 30fps |
| Video Format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone / Headphone Port | No | Yes (both) |
| Image Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
The RX10 II supports 4K video capturing, a major differentiator given the modest 720p capability on the MV800. Additionally, RX10 II supports external microphones and headphone monitoring, a professional-grade feature for serious videographers.
Video enthusiasts and multimedia shooters will find the RX10 II’s specs markedly superior.
Real-World Sample Images: Assessing Image Quality Visually
Visual comparison consolidates technical analysis by illustrating practical output differences.
- Samsung MV800 samples exhibit limited dynamic range, higher noise at ISO 800 and above, and subdued sharpness with mild softness at telephoto ends.
- Sony RX10 II samples demonstrate extended tonal depth, cleaner shadows, higher resolving power, and superior bokeh transitions.
This confirms the sensor and lens capabilities discussed earlier and validates the RX10 II for professional-quality output.
Genre-Specific Performance: Matching Cameras to Photographic Disciplines
Each photographic specialty demands tailored camera capabilities. Below is a detailed performance assessment summarized from tests.
| Genre | Samsung MV800 | Sony RX10 II |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Limited bokeh, face tracking present but modest | Excellent skin tone rendering, precise eye-detection AF |
| Landscape | Moderate resolution, limited dynamic range | High resolution, wide DR, weather resistance |
| Wildlife | Insufficient lens reach, slow AF | Fast AF, long tele zoom, high burst rate |
| Sports | No high frame rate or tracking | 14 fps continuous, robust AF tracking |
| Street | Portable but slower response | Bulkier but discreet shutter, EVF aids composition |
| Macro | No macro capability specified | Close focus at 3 cm, stabilized |
| Night / Astro | Weak high ISO, slow shutter max | Good high ISO, electronic shutter to 1/32000s |
| Video | Basic 720p, no mic input | 4K recording, mic/headphone support |
| Travel | Highly portable, limited features | Versatile but heavier |
| Professional | Lacks manual exposure modes or RAW | Fully manual control, RAW support |
The RX10 II leads decisively in all professional and excitement-driven genres while the MV800 aligns with casual and travel snapshot use.
Durability and Weather Sealing
The RX10 II features weather sealing, adding dust and moisture resistance for harsh environments - essential for outdoor professionals. The MV800 lacks any environmental sealing, limiting its deployment under challenging conditions.
Performance Ratings and Value Assessments
In aggregate testing, the Sony RX10 II scores substantially higher for image quality, autofocus, build quality, and video, justifying its higher price point (~$998 vs. $499 for MV800). The MV800 appeals to budget-conscious users prioritizing size and ease of use over advanced features.
Final Recommendations Based on User Profiles
Samsung MV800 is recommended for:
- Casual photographers seeking ultra-portable, simple operation
- Users prioritizing affordability and easy sharing over professional output
- Travelers desiring pocket-sized convenience with acceptable quality in good light
Sony RX10 II is recommended for:
- Enthusiasts and professionals requiring top-tier image quality and manual control
- Wildlife and sports photographers needing fast autofocus and longer zoom
- Video shooters demanding 4K with audio monitoring support
- Landscapers and portrait photographers valuing dynamic range and color fidelity
- Those comfortable managing a heavier camera in exchange for versatility
Closing Thoughts
This detailed comparative analysis reveals the Samsung MV800 and Sony RX10 II represent fundamentally different photographic toolsets. The MV800 is a compact point-and-shoot with touchscreen simplicity but limited creative latitude. Conversely, the RX10 II is a versatile, performance-oriented bridge camera offering advanced control, superior optics, and professional imaging potential.
By carefully aligning your photographic priorities with the strengths detailed here, you can make an informed acquisition that best complements your creative ambitions and shooting environments.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony RX10 II Specifications
| Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Samsung | Sony |
| Model | Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 II |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2011-09-01 | 2015-06-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-200mm (8.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 14.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 10.20 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 813 grams (1.79 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") | 129 x 88 x 102mm (5.1" x 3.5" x 4.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 531 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 400 photos |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BP70 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Micro SD | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $499 | $998 |