Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Launched September 2011
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Introduced August 2009
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Samsung MV800 and Sony TX1, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Samsung and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the MV800 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the MV800 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe MV800 was manufactured 2 years later than the TX1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the MV800 scores versus the TX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung MV800 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The entire galleries are available at Samsung MV800 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the Sony TX1
MV800 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | August 2009 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Samsung MV800
TX1 | MV800 |
---|
Common features in the Samsung MV800 and Sony TX1
MV800 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | No manual focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Samsung MV800 provides external measurements of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") along with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony TX1 has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Samsung MV800 and Sony TX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the MV800 compared to the TX1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the MV800 and TX1 is 97 and 96 respectively.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing merely by checking out a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the MV800 and TX1.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The MV800 due to its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Samsung MV800 will produce extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher MV800 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung MV800 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sony |
Model | Samsung MV800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2011-09-01 | 2009-08-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.3-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 142 grams (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | BP70 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Micro SD | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $499 | $350 |