Samsung NX1000 vs NX300M: A Detailed Hands-On Comparison for the Discerning Photographer

When Samsung took its first confident steps into the mirrorless camera arena, the NX1000 made a splash as an entry-level option geared towards enthusiasts looking to upgrade from compact cameras or smartphones. Roughly a year later, the NX300M arrived, promising improvements in ergonomics, autofocus, and image processing. Having spent hands-on time shooting with both, plus rigorous technical lab tests alongside a range of lenses, I’m excited to share an in-depth comparison that will help you decide if these cameras still deserve consideration or how they hold up as cost-effective used options.

I’ll walk through every relevant aspect - from sensor prowess and autofocus systems to their performance across popular photography genres - to offer a nuanced look at these two siblings. Along the way, you’ll find critical details and practical insights that you won’t easily get elsewhere. Let’s dive in.

Getting a Feel: Size, Handling, and Controls

Out of the box, the Samsung NX1000 strikes as compact and lightweight, weighing a mere 222 grams with dimensions of 114x63x37 mm. Its minimalistic rangefinder-style body feels portable but somewhat underwhelming in ergonomics - especially for users with larger hands or those used to more substantial grips. The NX300M, while heavier at 331 grams and slightly larger at 122x64x41 mm, immediately impresses with a more solid build and a thoughtfully contoured grip.

The physical size and ergonomics comparison is quite revealing:

You can see the NX300M’s larger grip and slightly chunkier build offer more confidence in hand, particularly under extended shooting sessions or when using longer lenses.

Moving on to controls, the NX300M boasts a tilting touchscreen and touch autofocus capabilities - a huge step up from the fixed non-touch TFT LCD of the NX1000. The top-view design distinctly reflects this generational leap:

Here, notice the NX300M’s additional buttons and improved dial layout, giving quicker access to exposure compensation, ISO, and drive modes without diving into menus - a bless for street and event photographers that thrive on spontaneity. Meanwhile, the NX1000 keeps things simple, but at the expense of customization and rapid changes.

In sum, for ergonomics and handling, the NX300M takes it easily - its bigger, more comfortable body with extra controls aligns better with prolonged shooting and professional workflows.

Inside the Frame: Sensor Technology and Image Quality

Both cameras share a 20-megapixel APS-C CMOS sensor with identical 23.5 x 15.7 mm dimensions and a 1.5x crop factor. Yet, sensor manufacturing tweaks and image pipeline upgrades translate into tangible differences.

Here’s a direct look at sensor specs side by side:

The NX1000 adheres to its 20MP resolution with the anticipated Bayer color filter array and includes an anti-aliasing filter. Samsung’s original processing engine supports ISO from 100 to 12,800, though usable ISO tops out closer to 800 in practice before noise becomes intrusive.

The NX300M, meanwhile, incorporates the DRIMe IV processor, pushing max ISO up to 25,600. My extensive comparative testing reveals the NX300M delivers cleaner files at high ISO, retaining color fidelity better and preserving shadow detail. Color depth and dynamic range edge ahead as well, making this model a smarter choice for low-light and high-contrast shooting.

To quantify this, DXOMark scores for the NX1000 note an overall of 72 with 22.8 bits of color depth and 12.4 EV dynamic range; the NX300M hasn't been officially tested there, but my own lab results suggest improved noise handling and comparable color accuracy with the bonus of higher ISO capability.

For resolution-critical work, both provide crisp detail, though the NX300M’s newer sensor and processing better handle highlight roll-off and shadow recovery. It’s especially apparent in RAW files, where the NX300M offers more latitude during post-production.

In essence: if you prioritize image quality under varied lighting conditions, the NX300M’s sensor-package is superior, but the NX1000 can still delight in well-lit scenarios or controlled studio settings.

Viewing and Interface: A Step Up in Interaction

The ability to frame, review, and interact efficiently is often overlooked until you’re deep into field shooting. Neither camera has an electronic viewfinder, relying solely on the rear LCD. This limits their appeal for bright outdoor use - a tradeoff given the entry-level mirrorless category they belong to.

Nevertheless, the NX300M’s screen technology leap cannot be overstated:

Compared to the NX1000’s 3-inch fixed TFT LCD with 921k dots, the NX300M offers a 3.3-inch tilting Active Matrix OLED screen with 768k dot resolution, but with superior contrast, color accuracy, and viewing angles. Plus, the touchscreen interface enhances navigation and focusing speed, allowing you to tap exactly where you want focus - a considerable boon for macro and street shooting.

If you’re the type who frequently shoots at waist level or overhead, the tilting screen on the NX300M adds creative flexibility missing from the NX1000’s rigid design.

So, while neither provides an EVF, on-screen usability firmly favors the NX300M, making it easier to compose shots crisply in challenging conditions and modifying settings swiftly.

Autofocus Systems: Speed, Accuracy, and Reliability

Samsung’s early mirrorless autofocus solutions were often considered lagging behind more mature systems from Sony or Fujifilm at the time. Yet, the difference between NX1000 and NX300M autofocus is dramatic, owing to hardware and software evolutions.

The NX1000 features 15 contrast-detection AF points, face detection, and basic AF modes including single, continuous, and selective AF. It lacks phase detection and advanced subject tracking. This often results in slower focus lock speeds in low contrast or moving subject scenarios.

On the opposite end, the NX300M boasts a hybrid AF system with 247 contrast and phase-detection AF points, extensive face detection, and continuous tracking capabilities. The processor upgrade to DRIMe IV again aids responsiveness and reduces shutter lag.

I put both to the test in wildlife and sports settings. The NX300M consistently delivers faster, more reliable focus acquisition on moving birds and athletes, with smoother continuous focus tracking and less hunting. The NX1000, while capable in daylight static subjects, struggles with fast-moving targets and low contrast scenes.

For portrait work, the NX300M’s enhanced face detection yields more usable frames with perfectly sharp eyes - the sort of practical AF improvements many will appreciate on casual shoots or family events.

In sum: the NX300M’s much more sophisticated AF system is a core reason to prefer it, particularly if you anticipate shooting action or spontaneous moments.

Putting Them Through Their Paces: Genre-Specific Performance

Let’s get practical. How do these cameras hold up in day-to-day photography disciplines that many enthusiasts pursue?

Portrait Photography

Both excel with the APS-C sensor providing nicely blurred backgrounds when paired with bright-aperture NX lenses. However, the NX300M’s superior autofocus face detection and faster burst rate (9 fps vs. 8 fps) help capture those fleeting expressions crisply. Color rendering is also more pleasing, delivering natural skin tones without oversaturation.

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range matters here, and the NX300M’s better sensor and processing produce files that retain detail in shadows and highlights more effectively. Both support RAW output and flexible aspect ratios, but the NX1000’s lower max ISO may limit handheld shooting in dim environments. Neither has weather sealing, so protective gear is a must in adverse conditions.

Wildlife Photography

Thanks to the NX300M’s hybrid AF and faster shutter speed ceiling (1/6000s vs. 1/4000s), it wins for critical moments needing swift capture. The NX1000’s autofocus and buffer feel dated, making it a less viable option for serious wildlife shooters.

Sports Photography

Quick autofocus and high fps rule here. Again, the NX300M shines with improved tracking and higher top frame rate. The NX1000 lags behind but is acceptable for slower-paced activities or casual sports.

Street Photography

For discreet shooting, compactness and quiet operation matter. The NX1000’s smaller body may be less intimidating on the street, but the NX300M’s enhanced touchscreen and faster AF beats for capturing fleeting moments. The absence of an EVF on both means composing at arm’s length is the norm.

Macro Photography

Precise focus is essential. The NX300M’s touchscreen autofocus makes selecting fine focus points easier, and its better live view responsiveness aids manual focus precision. Lack of in-body image stabilization on both hurts handheld macro work, making tripods or stabilized lenses crucial.

Night and Astrophotography

The NX300M pulls ahead with higher max ISO and cleaner noise profiles in dark scenes. Neither offers extended exposure modes natively or bulb mode controls, so advanced astrophotographers may find them lacking - but for casual night landscapes or star trails with long exposure, the NX300M fares better.

Video Capabilities

Both handle Full HD 1080p at 30 fps with H.264 compression. The NX300M adds a slight edge with the DRIMe IV processor enabling better noise handling and touch focus during recording. Neither supports 4K, and no microphone or headphone jacks limit professional audio capture. Built-in stabilization is absent, so gimbals or stabilized lenses are handy.

Travel Photography

Weight and battery life heavily influence travel gear decisions. The NX1000’s lighter weight and slightly longer rated battery life (320 vs. 330 shots) appeal, but the physical differences are minor. The NX300M’s rugged feel and better AF reliability nuance the choice toward it despite packing more bulk.

Professional Workflows

Neither camera is aimed squarely at professionals, but raw file support, USB connectivity, and flash sync offer basic integration points. The NX300M’s added NFC for quick image transfer and improved controls lean it closer to the needs of semi-pro workflows.

An overview table based on my testing illustrates these genre-related ratings:

Durability and Build Quality: Will They Last?

Neither the NX1000 nor the NX300M feature weather sealing, dustproofing, or ruggedized body materials. Both rely on plastic composites to keep weight down. However, the NX300M’s more robust construction and denser grip surface give it a confidence-inspiring heft that feels better suited for moderate use beyond controlled environments.

If you ask me, these aren’t cameras designed for brutal outdoor use or professional studio abuse without adequate protection, but they’re solid enough for casual enthusiasts.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility: Staying in the Samsung NX Family

Samsung’s NX mount supports around 32 native lenses, including primes, zooms, and specialties from f/1.4 fast primes to versatile kit lenses. Both cameras are fully compatible with these lenses, ensuring you don’t lose flexibility moving from one to another.

For example, the excellent 30mm f/2 pancake prime pairs beautifully with either model for street and portrait work. However, the NX300M’s superior AF and touchscreen help utilize the full potential of fast primes with faster focus confirmation.

In general, the shared mount means your choice won’t restrict future lens purchases, but the NX300M’s enhanced features help you exploit the lens potential more efficiently.

Battery, Storage, and Connectivity: Staying Powered and Connected

Battery life is comparable (320 shots on NX1000, 330 on NX300M, both tested under similar conditions). Both use proprietary battery packs (BC1030 vs. BP1130). Neither supports USB charging or battery grips, so carrying spares is prudent.

Storage via SD/SDHC/SDXC cards is single-slot on both; surprisingly, neither supports UHS-II speeds, which is somewhat limiting for burst shooting and video recording.

Connectivity-wise, both offer built-in Wi-Fi, but the NX300M uniquely adds NFC for faster pairing with smartphones. HDMI out and USB 2.0 are standard, but no Bluetooth or wired remote interfaces limit tethering options.

Summing It Up with Numbers: Performance Ratings at a Glance

To help you visualize the overall comparison, here’s a consolidated scoring chart considering expert lab metrics and field tests:

The NX300M consistently ranks higher across autofocus, image quality, and interface usability, while the NX1000 retains merit for portability and simplicity at a budget level.

Sample Images: Seeing Is Believing

Before rounding off, take a look at some direct RAW conversions and JPEG shots side by side from both cameras - portraits, landscapes, and action shots under varied conditions:

From these, note how the NX300M renders richer colors, better dynamic range, and crisper details in shadows - attributes you’ll appreciate in practical shooting.

Who Should Choose What? Clear Recommendations Based on Use

Choose the Samsung NX1000 if:

• You want an ultra-budget mirrorless that still beats typical smartphone or compact cameras
• You value portability and minimal weight for casual travel or snapshot photography
• You primarily shoot in good light and don’t need advanced autofocus
• You prefer a straightforward interface without touchscreen complexity

Choose the Samsung NX300M if:

• You demand faster, more reliable autofocus for wildlife, sports, or event photography
• You want a higher maximum ISO and better image quality in low-light scenarios
• You appreciate a touchscreen that facilitates faster operation and creative angles
• You frequently shoot video and want improved video autofocus and color rendering
• Your budget allows a pricier but more capable body with better ergonomics

Final Thoughts from Years of Hands-On Testing

The Samsung NX line is fascinating as an example of early mirrorless innovation that paired competent sensor technology with aggressive pricing. Between the two, the NX300M stands out as the clear practical and technical upgrade, especially when weighing autofocus and screen usability. That said, the NX1000 remains surprisingly charming for beginners and tight budgets, with respectable image quality and the signature Samsung NX lens mount.

If you’re a photography enthusiast considering either as an affordable gateway into interchangeable-lens mirrorless systems, I recommend giving the NX300M a close look - even on the used market today - as it will yield fewer frustrations and more creative flexibility. Meanwhile, the NX1000 can still charm if you’re after something lightweight or a compact secondary camera.

Both represent valuable learning tools and capable cameras that, with the right lenses and shooting scenarios, continue to produce rewarding images. I hope this comprehensive guide helps you navigate their strengths and shortcomings with confidence and find the right fit for your photographic journey.

Thanks for reading - if you have questions about specific shooting modes or lens pairing with either camera, feel free to ask. I’m always happy to share more hands-on insights!