Samsung NX2000 vs Sony HX5
89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64


92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX1100
- Successor is Samsung NX3000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2010

Samsung NX2000 vs Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5: A Hands-On Comparison for Enthusiasts and Professionals
In the rapidly evolving world of digital cameras, making the right choice between two seemingly different models can be both exciting and perplexing. Today, I’m putting under the microscope the Samsung NX2000, a 2013 entry-level mirrorless camera with an APS-C sensor, and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5, a compact premium point-and-shoot from 2010 known for its versatile zoom range and pocket-friendly design. Although these two cameras hail from distinct categories - a mirrorless system versus a small-sensor compact - they both target enthusiasts seeking capable alternatives to smartphone photography.
Having tested thousands of cameras personally, including both compact and mirrorless platforms, I’m sharing detailed insights based on hands-on experience, technical analysis, and practical shooting tests. We will cover every major photography genre, analyze core technical specs, and ultimately help you decide which camera better fits your style, budget, and photographic ambitions.
Let’s dive in.
Size, Ergonomics & Handling: The Feel of the Camera in Your Hands
The first impression always begins with size and how the camera fits into your shooting rhythm.
Here you see the Samsung NX2000 with its rangefinder-style mirrorless body alongside the diminutive Sony HX5 compact. The NX2000 is larger - 119x65x36 mm versus the HX5’s 102x58x29 mm - and noticeably heavier (228g vs 200g). But that size brings merits. The NX2000 offers space for a substantial grip and well-placed buttons that help maintain stability during extended shoots, especially with longer lenses. In contrast, the Sony HX5 fits comfortably in your pocket or purse, ideal for casual carry or travel without bulk.
Regarding handling, the NX2000’s control layout, including dedicated dials for shutter/aperture priority and manual exposure, caters to those who want direct access to creative settings (a rare treat on entry-level cameras). The HX5, true to its compact design, relies more on menus with fewer physical controls, leaning towards users preferring simplicity over tactile input.
If you value a camera you can hold confidently and control intuitively during a shoot, the NX2000 wins hands down. But if unobtrusive portability is your priority, the HX5’s petite form factor makes it a winner.
Sensor & Image Quality: APS-C vs Small Sensor – The Core Difference
The real power driver in image quality is the sensor inside. The Samsung NX2000 boasts an APS-C CMOS sensor measuring 23.5x15.7 mm with 20 megapixels. Meanwhile, the Sony HX5 uses a much smaller 1/2.4” BSI-CMOS sensor (6.1x4.6 mm) with 10 megapixels.
This size gap is significant. A larger APS-C sensor typically gathers more light, delivering superior dynamic range, color depth, and noise control - ideal for enthusiasts demanding high image fidelity. Indeed, DxOMark scores give the NX2000 a solid overall rating of 75, with particularly strong color depth (23.4 bits) and dynamic range (~12.3 stops). The HX5 hasn’t been tested by DxO, but smaller sensors generally lag behind in low-light and tonal subtleties.
Through side-by-side test shots capturing landscape vistas and indoor portraits, the NX2000 delivers richer color gradation and cleaner shadows especially when raising ISO beyond native 100. In contrast, the HX5’s images are more prone to noise and loss of detail at ISO 800 and above due to its compact sensor’s smaller photodiodes.
Image sharpness on the NX2000 benefits from interchangeable prime and zoom lenses within Samsung’s NX mount ecosystem, which includes 32 options ranging from fast apertures to telephoto reach. The HX5’s 10x optical zoom lens covering 25-250mm (35mm equivalent) fairs well for travel but compromises light gathering at telephoto’s narrower f/5.5 aperture, limiting depth-of-field control and low-light flexibility.
In practical terms, for photographers seeking high-resolution, richly detailed images with room for post-processing latitude, the NX2000’s sensor is a compelling advantage. The HX5 is more about convenience and zoom versatility than top-notch image quality.
LCD Screen & User Interface: Touchscreen Convenience
Both cameras forgo a viewfinder, relying on rear LCDs for composition and review. However, their screens differ markedly.
The Samsung NX2000 sports a large 3.7-inch touchscreen TFT LCD with 1152k-dot resolution. This bright, sensitive display makes framing and menu navigation more comfortable, especially in daylight. Touch AF and touch shutter add a smooth, modern interface layer - a boon for quick focusing on a subject’s eye or changing settings.
Meanwhile, the Sony HX5’s 3.0-inch fixed LCD has a modest 230k-dot resolution without touch capability. It’s functional but can feel cramped and less clear, especially in harsh light conditions.
Importantly, the NX2000 does not offer an electronic viewfinder, so composing exclusively on the LCD can be tricky under bright sunlight. The HX5 lacks a viewfinder altogether.
I find the NX2000’s sizable touchscreen a real ergonomic upgrade, smoothing the shooting experience - especially for beginners accustomed to smartphone-style operation.
Autofocus Performance: Getting the Perfect Focus Under Pressure
Autofocus capability is critical, particularly for fast-moving subjects or shallow depth-of-field portraits.
The NX2000 utilizes contrast-detection autofocus with 21 focus points (including face detection) and supports AF tracking, continuous AF, single AF, and selective AF modes. Its touch AF means you can tap to focus, then use focus lock while reframing. It does not have phase-detection AF or animal eye detection, which can limit subject tracking accuracy in complex wildlife scenarios.
The HX5 employs contrast-detection with 9 focus points, focusing solely on single AF. Face detection is absent, and there’s no continuous AF tracking. Its autofocus is generally responsive but less sophisticated than the NX2000’s system.
In real-world shooting, the NX2000 locks focus quickly for portraits and maintains sharp focus in continuous burst mode - valuable for sports or wildlife snapshots (though it’s not a specialized sports camera). The HX5 is more suited to non-critical focusing, working well for casual snapshots but showing limitations when subject motion or tricky lighting appear.
Burst Shooting & Speed: Can They Keep Up With Action?
The ability to shoot multiple frames per second helps capture fleeting moments in sports or wildlife.
The Samsung NX2000 offers an 8 fps continuous shooting rate, a respectable speed for entry-level MIRRORLESS cameras, paired with 14 RAW burst buffer depth. Its shutter speed maxes at 1/4000 s, allowing good control over motion blur.
The Sony HX5 boasts a faster burst at 10 fps but only supports JPEG stills (no RAW) and reduces frame size at this speed. Its max shutter speed is 1/1600 s, less versatile for bright conditions or fast action stops.
While burst rate numbers look close, the NX2000’s buffer and RAW support make it preferable for capturing sequences where image quality and post-processing flexibility are important.
Video Recording Capabilities: Not Quite Hollywood, But Useable
Video on the NX2000 records 1080p Full HD at 30 fps and 24 fps, and 720p at 30 fps, using MPEG-4 and H.264 codecs. It lacks microphone and headphone jacks and does not offer 4K recording or high frame rates for slow motion. No in-body image stabilization means relying on stabilized lenses.
Sony HX5 provides Full HD 1080p recording at 60 fps using AVCHD codec, an advantage for smooth video capture compared to NX2000. It features optical image stabilization helping steady footage but similarly lacks external mic inputs.
From practical testing, the HX5 produces smoother handheld video thanks to optical IS and higher frame rates, favorable for casual video makers or travel vloggers. The NX2000's video quality is good but limited for advanced video production.
Battery Life and Storage: How Long Can You Shoot?
The NX2000 uses a BP1130 battery promising approximately 340 shots per charge per CIPA, which is decent for a mirrorless but still requires caution for longer shoots.
The Sony HX5 lacks official CIPA ratings but smaller compacts typically achieve around 250-300 shots depending on usage. The HX5’s support for Memory Stick Duo and optional SD cards provides flexible storage options.
In practice, battery endurance is similar but use of Wi-Fi on the NX2000 may drain power faster if engaged.
Connectivity, Build Quality & Weather Resilience: Ready for Adventure?
Connectivity-wise, the Samsung NX2000 shines with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC for effortless image transfer and remote control via smartphones. Sony HX5 has none - though it does have built-in GPS for geotagging.
Neither camera offers environmental sealing, waterproofing, or robust shockproofing, so demanding outdoor professionals will need protective housing.
Build quality on the NX2000 feels solid with durable plastics and metal accents, while the HX5 is more lightweight and plasticky but well assembled for its type.
Lens Ecosystem and Expandability: One Lens or Many?
This is the clearest differentiator. The Samsung NX system offers 32 native lenses ranging from bright primes to telephoto zooms, macro offerings, and specialty optics - with full manual controls available. This opens unlimited creative paths across portrait, landscape, sports, and macro disciplines.
The Sony HX5 has a fixed 10x zoom covering wide to telephoto but no lens change possible - limiting optical versatility and aperture options.
Genre-Specific Performance Insights: Who Excels Where?
Now, let’s zoom in on practical application across popular photography genres:
Portraits
- NX2000: Larger sensor, excellent skin tone rendition, capability for selective focus and pleasing bokeh with fast primes. Face detection AF works well.
- HX5: Limited by sensor size and lens aperture; portraits less creamy, more clinical. No face AF.
Winner: NX2000 provides more professional portrait potential.
Landscape
- NX2000: Superior dynamic range and resolution. Ability to use ultra-wide primes or zooms.
- HX5: Smaller sensor and limited wide-angle coverage; acceptable for casual travel snaps.
Winner: NX2000 for image quality and creative control.
Wildlife
- NX2000: Good burst and AF tracking, but no phase detect AF limits fast subject accuracy. Telephoto lenses needed.
- HX5: 10x zoom built-in, good for casual wildlife. AF slower and prone to hunting.
Winner: Depending on telephoto needs, NX2000 with long lens wins hands down, but HX5 is easier to carry for casual use.
Sports
- NX2000: Better continuous shooting quality and buffer, manual controls, higher shutter ceiling.
- HX5: Faster frame rates but limited buffer and image quality.
Winner: NX2000 for passionate sports shooters.
Street
- HX5 wins thanks to compact size and discreet operation; no lens change needed, quick shooting.
- NX2000 is bulkier and less discrete.
Macro
- NX2000 can tap into dedicated macro lenses and manual focus precision.
- HX5 offers close focusing at 5cm but no dedicated macro lens.
Winner: NX2000 for macro enthusiasts.
Night/Astro
- NX2000’s larger sensor and ISO up to 25600 (though noisy then) offers better low-light ability.
- HX5’s max ISO is 3200 and noise performance poorer.
Video
- HX5 notable for 60 fps 1080p and optical stabilization.
- NX2000 good image quality but lacks advanced video features.
Travel
- HX5 excels with compact form and zoom range.
- NX2000 more versatile but heavier and larger.
Professional Workflows
- NX2000 outputs RAW files, robust manual controls, and integrates better into professional editing pipelines.
- HX5 limited to JPEG, fewer adjustments.
Sample Image Gallery: Seeing Is Believing
To make these distinctions tangible, I compiled a set of side-by-side images from both cameras covering portraits, landscapes, and action shots.
You can clearly see the NX2000’s greater detail retention, dynamic range, and color fidelity. The HX5’s shots, while clean and sharp at base ISO, soften at higher ISO or enlargement.
Overall Performance Summary
The Samsung NX2000’s strengths hinge on its APS-C sensor, lens flexibility, controls, and image quality. Meanwhile, the Sony HX5 scores on portability, zoom versatility, and smooth video capture.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
Both the Samsung NX2000 and Sony HX5 occupy niche roles now somewhat outdated by modern technologies but still relevant for budget-conscious enthusiasts.
-
Pick the Samsung NX2000 if you:
- Want substantial creative control with manual exposure modes and interchangeable lenses
- Prioritize image quality, portrait, and landscape photography
- Are willing to carry a slightly larger system for rewards in flexibility
- Prefer a touchscreen interface and wireless connectivity
-
Opt for the Sony HX5 if you:
- Need an ultra-compact, easy-to-carry travel companion with built-in 10x zoom
- Value quick shooting with some video enhancements
- Prefer a point-and-shoot style simplicity without lens swaps
- Seek built-in GPS tagging without external accessories
Dear reader, if you’re an enthusiast considering an upgrade, the Samsung NX2000 is the wiser pick, especially if lenses, controls, and photo quality matter. But as a lightweight grab-and-go option, the Sony HX5 still has nostalgic charm.
In closing, remember no camera is perfect; the key is matching gear to your photographic style and ambitions. With the deep dive above, you’ll weigh your priorities more clearly when making that purchase. Happy shooting!
If you want a quick refresher on all specs and prices, I’ve linked everything side-by-side (above). Feel free to reach out with questions or for specific shooting scenario advice!
Samsung NX2000 vs Sony HX5 Specifications
Samsung NX2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Samsung | Sony |
Model type | Samsung NX2000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-11-30 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 369.0mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 21 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 32 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.7" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,152 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 228g (0.50 lb) | 200g (0.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 75 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.4 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 908 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 340 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP1130 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $599 | $275 |