Samsung NX300 vs Sony HX200V: Which Camera Is the Better Pick for Your Photography Adventures?

Every photographer faces a familiar dilemma: juggling gear specs, real-world usability, and of course - budget. Today we're going head-to-head with two intriguing cameras that nibble at different parts of the market spectrum but often get compared because they are compact, generally affordable, and aimed at enthusiasts wanting to step up their game without hauling a camera bag like a pro.

I’ve spent weeks shooting extensively with both the Samsung NX300 - a mirrorless APS-C sensor marvel announced in late 2013 - and the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V, a 2012 vintage bridge superzoom with a fixed lens, aiming to cover a huge focal range. Both offer unique angles on photography: one, a mirrorless with interchangeable lenses and a large sensor; the other, a zoom-all-the-things-in-one shooter.

Let’s dive into this comparison with my field-tested insights, technical deep-dives, and practical notes likely to help you pinpoint your next capable companion.

Getting a Feel: Size, Ergonomics & Handling

Before you even press the shutter, how a camera fits in your hands can seal the deal or send you running for a sturdier option. The Samsung NX300 is a compact, rangefinder-style mirrorless camera. Its slim silhouette at 122 x 64 x 41 mm and weight of 331 grams makes it pleasantly pocketable with a pancake lens. Samsung’s design philosophy here leans toward sleekness without compromising grip ergonomics.

On the flip side, the Sony HX200V is a bit of a brick by comparison - a true “bridge” style camera with DSLR-inspired contours, measuring 122 x 87 x 93 mm and tipping the scales at 583 grams. Its beefier footprint houses a fixed 30x zoom, which naturally calls for a bit more heft for balance.

Handling wise, the NX300’s controls feel more 'modern mirrorless' - compact but well thought-through for quick operation. Meanwhile, the HX200V’s DSLR-like grip offers a more substantial hold to steady those long zoom shots, albeit at the cost of extra weight in your bag. For anyone prioritizing portability and carrying comfort, Samsung’s offering wins hands down. But if you crave stability especially when stretching that zoom arm, the Sony feels reassuring.

Up Top: Design Language and Controls at Your Fingertips

Peeking through the cameras’ top decks reveals design philosophies that echo their core identities.

The NX300 presents a minimalist crown - very little clutter, with a nicely integrated mode dial, shutter button, and a dedicated movie record button. Its futuristic DRIMe IV processor powers the intuitive control layout, customized for quick access.

Conversely, the Sony HX200V leans towards a classic bridge camera approach: a mode dial flanked by zoom control rings, and physical buttons peppering the top plate for ISO, exposure compensation, and flash. The physical zoom ring is a blessing when you want precise focal length control without hunting through menus - an ergonomic win for wildlife or travel shooters.

The bottom line? The Samsung’s cleaner interface favors photographers who like simplicity and touchscreen interactions, while Sony’s button-rich top is great for shooters who want direct dial-in control without feeling the pinch from tiny screens.

Sensor Technology & Image Quality: The Core Difference

Arguably, the sensor and image processing engine define the most critical quality aspects - and the Samsung NX300 flexes some serious muscle here.

The NX300 rocks a 20MP APS-C CMOS sensor (23.5 x 15.7 mm) - about 13 times larger in surface area than the Sony's sensor - paired with Samsung’s DRIMe IV processor. This sensor size delivers substantially better noise control, dynamic range, and detail retrieval than the HX200V’s modest 1/2.3" BSI CMOS sensor (6.17 x 4.55 mm) boasting 18MP. Don’t be surprised if your landscapes from the NX300 reveal deeper shadows and crisper highlight retention; the 12.7 EV dynamic range measured by DXOmark speaks volumes.

The HX200V camera’s sensor is squeezed into a tiny frame to achieve lightning zoom reach - a tradeoff that manifests as weaker high ISO performance and less depth of field control.

Key takeaways from my lab and field tests: The NX300’s larger sensor shines in all genres needing image quality - portraits, landscapes, night shots - where you can clearly see the benefits of broader tonal latitude and cleaner images from ISO 100 through 3200. The Sony HX200V handles daylight captures surprisingly well for a bridge camera but struggles under low light conditions, revealing grain and edge softening.

Live View and Rear LCD: Your Composing Companion

The screen’s usability can make or break your shooting experience when the viewfinder is absent or a secondary option.

Samsung equips the NX300 with a vibrant 3.3-inch Active Matrix OLED touchscreen boasting 768k pixels, and a tilting mechanism that expertly supports waist-level or high-angle shooting. This touchscreen is surprisingly responsive and lets you tap to focus - a boon for casual shooting or grabbing sharp portraits.

The Sony HX200V sports a 3-inch XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD with 922k pixels and tilts upwards for low-angle shots; however, it lacks touch functionality. Its electronic viewfinder comes in handy for bright daylight framing, something the NX300 sorely misses. That said, I found the OLED screen on Samsung’s body more pleasing and adaptable for varied shooting scenarios.

Autofocus & Speed: Catching the Decisive Moment

Speed and accuracy in focus can make or break fast-paced photography like sports, wildlife, and street.

The NX300’s Hybrid Auto Focus combines contrast detection with phase detection across 247 focus points - a tad ahead in responsiveness and tracking than Sony’s contrast-detection-only AF system with 9 points. Samsung’s system excels when hunting for eyes and faces - which proved invaluable in portrait sessions.

Samsung also delivers continuous burst shooting up to 9 fps with continuous AF - versatile for action shots. Sony touts a 10 fps max frame rate, but it's more limited in AF capabilities and often locks focus from the first frame, which is less forgiving for moving subjects.

On practical outings - chasing kids, wildlife, or fast athletes - NX300’s AF kept pace better, especially in live-view mode with touch AF. The HX200V's slower and less flexible autofocus means you sometimes miss split-second moments or get locked on the wrong subject.

Lens Ecosystem vs Fixed Zoom Convenience

One of the most prominent contrasts is Samsung’s interchangeable lens mount (Samsung NX mount) compared to Sony’s fixed superzoom.

Samsung's system supports 32 native lenses, ranging from compact primes to telephoto zooms, though today the lineup isn't as extensive as Canon or Sony E-mounts. This flexibility allows shooters to tailor the camera to niche needs - macro lenses for extreme close-ups, fast primes for portraits, and ultra-wide zooms for landscapes.

Sony’s HX200V, with built-in 27-810mm equivalent zoom (F2.8-5.6), aims to be an all-in-one solution - no changing lenses, no extra gear juggling. This appeals to travelers and hobbyists who want maximum reach without fuss.

From personal experience, nothing beats the versatility of a mirrorless system like the NX300 if you plan to explore multiple photography styles. On the other hand, the HX200V is a grab-and-shoot beast for casual users who want extensive zoom for wildlife, travel, or sports without lens swaps.

Build Quality, Weather Sealing & Durability

Neither camera boasts weather-sealing or rugged construction, so cautious use in challenging environments is a must for both. The NX300’s lighter build feels more delicate, while the HX200V's chunkier body gives a more robust impression - useful when contending with longer lenses and outdoor shooting.

Battery Life & Storage Versatility

Battery life is a big practical concern for long days in the field.

The Samsung NX300 runs off the BP1130 battery delivering an estimated 330 shots on a full charge - average for mirrorless of its era. The Sony HX200V impresses with up to 450 shots thanks to the power efficiency of the smaller sensor and bridge architecture.

Both use a single SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot. The HX200V additionally supports Sony’s proprietary Memory Stick formats, offering some flexibility for existing Sony users.

Connectivity and Features Worth Mentioning

Samsung scores with built-in Wi-Fi and NFC, hackable for mobile photo transfers - critical for the modern sharing addict. Sony misses out on NFC but offers GPS tagging built-in, which travel photographers adore.

Neither model supports microphone or headphone jacks, limiting serious videography ambitions (I'm looking at you, vloggers!).

Video Performance: Which One Suits Moving Pictures?

Video is secondary but often a deciding factor nowadays.

The NX300 shoots Full HD 1080p at 30 fps in MPEG-4 and H.264 formats but lacks advanced video-centric features like 4K or microphone inputs. Its touchscreen helps with touch AF during recording, smoothing focus transitions.

Sony HX200V offers 1080p at up to 60 fps in AVCHD and MPEG-4 - higher frame rates that benefit action or slow-motion siblings. Optical stabilization helps hand-holding telephoto videos, which is a definite plus. However, it cannot do continuous autofocus in video mode, hampering smooth focus pulls.

In terms of video usability, HX200V edges out the NX300 for casual shooters wanting stabilized, long-zoom footage, but neither camera is ideal for professional video.

Diving into Photography Genres: Which Camera Shines Where?

Let’s analyze how these two contenders perform across popular photography disciplines:

Portrait Photography

Samsung’s APS-C sensor decisively wins here. Skin tone rendition is more natural and noise-free at higher ISOs; the bokeh achievable with faster NX-mount lenses gives creamy background separation. Samsung’s 247-point hybrid AF nails eye detection with impressive precision.

Sony’s smaller sensor limits your depth of field control; backgrounds are more in focus by default, and color rendering feels a bit flatter. Its 9-point AF can lock onto faces but sometimes struggles to keep tracking alive.

Winner: Samsung NX300

Landscape Photography

Dynamic range and resolution are key. The Samsung NX300’s bigger sensor captures finer details in shadows and highlights and handles wide tonal extremes far better. Weather sealing is missing on both, so pack accordingly.

Sony’s 1/2.3" sensor extends reach for distant vistas but can't resolve fine details as sharply, with more noise creeping in skies and foliage.

Winner: Samsung NX300

Wildlife Photography

Sony’s huge 30x zoom lens gives a massive advantage for distant subjects without swapping lenses or lugging telephotos. The built-in optical stabilization also helps steady long-range shots.

Samsung’s interchangeable lenses mean you could match or exceed Sony’s reach, but need to invest in longer telephoto NX optics, which can get pricey and bulky.

NX300’s superior AF speed and tracking edge it out for moving wildlife, although you may need to complement with longer glass.

Overall: Sony wins for all-in-one convenience; Samsung wins for serious wildlife shooters with interchangeable lenses.

Sports Photography

Burst rate and AF tracking decide the game. Samsung NX300’s 9 fps with continuous hybrid AF is impressive for the class - helping track runners or cyclists.

Sony claims 10 fps but limited AF tracking when shooting bursts makes it less reliable. The HX200V’s telephoto reach is helpful for outdoor sports but less ideal for indoors or low light.

Winner: Samsung NX300

Street Photography

Portability and discreetness are critical here. NX300’s compact profile and touch screen tilt lend themselves well to street candids. The absence of viewfinder is a downside in bright light but adjustable LCD helps.

Sony’s larger format is less pocket-friendly but its electronic viewfinder enables quick framing without attracting attention from upside-down LCD screens.

Winner: Samsung NX300 (for portability and image quality)

Macro Photography

Samsung’s interchangeable lens advantage opens doors to true macro glass and focus stacking workflows. The NX300’s fast and precise AF assists in focusing on tiny details.

Sony’s fixed lens boasts a close focus distance of 1 cm, impressive for macro snaps without extra gear, but image quality and sharpness suffer due to sensor limitations.

Winner: Samsung NX300

Night & Astrophotography

Noise handling and long exposures matter. Samsung’s low noise at ISO 800-3200 and support for shutter speeds up to 1/6000 sec give it chops to catch stars and cityscapes better.

Sony’s smaller sensor struggles in low light, and max shutter speed of 1/4000 sec limits flexibility. Both lack built-in intervalometers or long-exposure modes for astro - third-party solutions needed.

Winner: Samsung NX300

Travel Photography

Sony’s all-in-one superzoom and GPS tagging enable shoot-anything-anywhere convenience. Battery life is longer, and lens versatility is built-in.

Samsung’s smaller footprint, touchscreen wireless features, and superior image quality make it a versatile travel partner - provided you don’t mind carrying an extra lens or two.

Winner: Subjective - Sony for convenience, Samsung for image quality

Professional Use

Samsung offers standard RAW support, customizable buttons, and good manual exposure control. However, it lacks environmental sealing and robust weather protection.

Sony is more basic here, lacking RAW (shoots only JPEG) and versatile lens choices, limiting workflow flexibility.

Winner: Samsung NX300

Verdict in Numbers: Performance and User Ratings

I quantified overall and genre-specific performance based on tests, user feedback, and expert reviews.

Samsung leads hands-down in core performance categories - image quality, autofocus, and burst shooting. Sony holds ground in zoom breadth, battery life, and some video features.

Where Does That Leave You? Recommendations by User Types:

• Aspiring and Enthusiast Photographers
  Prefer image quality, manual control, and lens flexibility? The Samsung NX300 is your playground. Its vibrant touchscreen, large sensor, and hybrid AF system are a joy to use.

• Casual Traveler or All-in-One Shooter
  Want a travelled distance-obsessed companion without fussing over lenses? Sony HX200V’s mega zoom, optical stabilization, and GPS tagging will serve you well.

• Wildlife Photographers on a Budget
  Sony’s zoom reach is tempting, but if you’re willing to invest in telephoto lenses, NX300’s larger sensor and better AF make it better for fast wildlife action.

• Street Photographers
  Lean towards the compactness and touchscreen of the NX300 for discreet shooting.

• Videographers
  Neither camera excels, but Sony offers slightly better video frame rates and OIS - still, both feel limited for serious video work.

Conclusion: Worth the Upgrade or Save Your Cash?

The Samsung NX300, with its 20MP APS-C sensor, hybrid AF, and interchangeable lens system, embodies a modern enthusiast mirrorless camera - versatile, image-quality driven, and ergonomic. Despite missing a viewfinder and weather sealing, its strengths for portraits, street shooting, and varied photography genres are clear.

The Sony HX200V, predating the mirrorless boom, still holds charm as a versatile superzoom bridge camera - ideal for travelers wanting one lens for everything and decent video capabilities. Its smaller sensor and limited AF, however, cap image quality and versatility.

If image quality and autofocus speed are top priority, invest in the NX300 system. If maximum zoom in a single package and longer battery life are your must-haves, Sony’s HX200V offers great value.

Happy shooting whichever path you choose!

Sample Images and Real-World Outputs

No comparison is complete without seeing what these cams dish out in the field.

Samsung NX300 screen back Sony HX200V front Sony HX200V screen back

From lush landscapes to detailed portraits, the difference is palpable - the NX300’s files cleanly offer more detail and color fidelity, while the HX200V’s shots often carry more noise and less pop, but zoom in well for wildlife or distant subjects.

This comparison was crafted from countless hours behind both viewfinders, lab testing, and real-world experience. I hope this deep dive helps you make an informed choice - and perhaps inspires you to get clicking with new gear in hand!

Feel free to ask if you want hands-on tips or lens suggestions for either system. Until then, keep enjoying the frame, whatever camera you have!

END