Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV
Portability
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Portability
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
52 Imaging
53 Features
82 Overall
64
Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Key Specs
Samsung NX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Revealed November 2013
- Older Model is Samsung NX210
- Refreshed by Samsung NX500
Sony RX10 IV
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1095g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Announced September 2017
- Earlier Model is Sony RX10 III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Overview
Below is a extensive comparison of the Samsung NX300 and Sony RX10 IV, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Samsung and Sony. The image resolution of the NX300 (20MP) and the RX10 IV (20MP) is relatively close but the NX300 (APS-C) and RX10 IV (1") possess different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe NX300 was unveiled 4 years before the RX10 IV and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 IV being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple summary of how the NX300 matches up versus the RX10 IV in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung NX300 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV. The full galleries are provided at Samsung NX300 Gallery & Sony RX10 IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Sony RX10 IV
| NX300 | RX10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 IV over the Samsung NX300
| RX10 IV | NX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | September 2017 |  | November 2013 | More recent by 46 months |
| Screen resolution | 1440k |  | 768k | Sharper screen (+672k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung NX300 and Sony RX10 IV
| NX300 | RX10 IV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Tilting | Tilting screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Samsung NX300 offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs) while the Sony RX10 IV has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") with a weight of 1095 grams (2.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Samsung NX300 and Sony RX10 IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the NX300 and the RX10 IV.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the NX300 and RX10 IV is 86 and 52 respectively.
Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to imagine the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specifications. The graphic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the NX300 and RX10 IV.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses the exact same MP albeit different sensor measurements. The NX300 has the bigger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh simpler. The older NX300 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung NX300 Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 IV Portrait photography factors
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW files
you can focus manually
high flash sync (1/2,000 seconds)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (1")
features face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Samsung NX300 Street photography highlights
Sony RX10 IV Street photography highlights
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
nice sensor size (1")
delivers RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
environment proofing
more heavy than competitors (1,095 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sports photography with Samsung NX300
Sports photography with Sony RX10 IV
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000 seconds)
resolution is good (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
amazing zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (24.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
features tracking focus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung NX300 Travel photography features
Sony RX10 IV Travel photography features
boasts touch focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
no Time Lapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
environment proofing
supports bluetooth
comes with touch to focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long reach (600mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than competitors (1,095 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung NX300 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Landscape photography camera
manual focus
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3.3")
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
does not have image stabilization
no Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (20MP)
nice sensor size (1")
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
lack of Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung NX300 as a Vlogging camera
Sony RX10 IV as a Vlogging camera
touch screen
features face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
no external mic socket
really wide (24mm)
touchscreen
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have microphone jack
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
more heavy than competitors (1,095g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Samsung NX300 vs Sony RX10 IV Specifications
| Samsung NX300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Sony |
| Model type | Samsung NX300 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 IV |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-11-24 | 2017-09-12 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DRIMe IV | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.7mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 369.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 5472 x 3648 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 247 | 315 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Samsung NX | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 32 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 768 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | Active Matrix OLED screen | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/6000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 9.0 frames per second | 24.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 331g (0.73 lb) | 1095g (2.41 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 76 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.6 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 942 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | 400 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BP1130 | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $750 | $1,698 |