Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Announced February 2016
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Below is a complete review of the Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Samsung and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the SH100 (14MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the SH100 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe SH100 was launched 6 years earlier than the Quattro and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SH100 grades versus the Quattro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Samsung SH100 and Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Samsung SH100 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Sigma Quattro
SH100 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Samsung SH100
Quattro | SH100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2016 | January 2011 | More recent by 62 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Clearer display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SH100 and Sigma Quattro
SH100 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Samsung SH100 has got physical dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) whilst the Sigma Quattro has measurements of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the SH100 vs the Quattro.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH100 and Quattro is 99 and 63 respectively.
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The graphic here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the SH100 and Quattro.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The SH100 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro will offer extra detail utilizing its extra 15MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older SH100 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Samsung SH100 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Samsung SH100 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Samsung | Sigma |
Model | Samsung SH100 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-01-04 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4230 x 3240 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | - | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | () | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | - |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | - | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | - | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $200 | $738 |