Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL65
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Following is a in depth overview of the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung SL620, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are created by Samsung. The resolution of the SL102 (10MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is very comparable and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SL102 was unveiled about the same time to the SL620 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the SL102 grades versus the SL620 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL102 and Samsung SL620. The full galleries are viewable at Samsung SL102 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung SL620
| SL102 | SL620 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Samsung SL102
| SL620 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung SL620
| SL102 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | February 2009 | Same generation |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | No Touch friendly display |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL102 offers exterior dimensions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has proportions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SL102 vs the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SL102 and SL620 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the SL102 and SL620.
As you can see, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Samsung SL620 to show greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model type | Samsung SL102 | Samsung SL620 |
| Otherwise known as | ES55 | PL65 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 116 gr (0.26 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $130 | $200 |