Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched January 2009
- Alternative Name is ES55
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
Photography Glossary Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB850F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the SL102 (10MP) and WB850F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SL102 was launched 4 years prior to the WB850F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the SL102 grades against the WB850F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Samsung SL102 & Samsung WB850F. The complete galleries are available at Samsung SL102 Gallery & Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Samsung WB850F
| SL102 | WB850F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Samsung SL102
| WB850F | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Samsung SL102 and Samsung WB850F
| SL102 | WB850F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Samsung SL102 enjoys physical measurements of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB850F has proportions of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Samsung SL102 versus Samsung WB850F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view scale comparison of the SL102 vs the WB850F.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SL102 and WB850F is 96 and 91 respectively.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizes just by checking specs. The image underneath may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the SL102 and WB850F.
All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Samsung WB850F to give more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged SL102 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Samsung SL102 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
| Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB850F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL102 | Samsung WB850F |
| Other name | ES55 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | - | AMOLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 116g (0.26 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $130 | $599 |