Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Also referred to as PL50
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB800F, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the SL202 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe SL202 was introduced 4 years prior to the WB800F which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief view of how the SL202 matches up versus the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Samsung SL202 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are available at Samsung SL202 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Samsung WB800F
| SL202 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Samsung SL202
| WB800F | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 47 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Samsung SL202 and Samsung WB800F
| SL202 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Samsung SL202 has outside measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Samsung SL202 versus Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the SL202 compared to the WB800F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SL202 and WB800F is 94 and 92 respectively.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The picture here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SL202 and WB800F.
All in all, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to offer you more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged SL202 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Samsung SL202 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Samsung | Samsung |
| Model | Samsung SL202 | Samsung WB800F |
| Also called as | PL50 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2009-02-17 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.7 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.60 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 lb) | 218 grams (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | SLB-10A | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $140 | $300 |